Estimating the Concentration of Heavy Metals in Oleander/Pink and white Oleander Plants

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

• India being a tropical country is host to a rich and western countries such as the United States, 5–10% of
• toxic properties of varying degree. Cases of accidental overall percentage of plant poisoning ranges from 6%
• poisoning relating to these plants due to mistaken to 15%, but if the same is taken in the context of the
• rats 250 and 4000 mg/kg body weight (b.w.), available. These include techniques from the rapid
• Table 1: Plants containing cardiac glycosides
• 99.99% pure element solution and used deionized water weighed and then ash content was calculated for the
• then the volume were complete to 100 ml. The Ash content %={(W3-W1)/(W2-W1)} *100
• absorbance of the samples was measured at the We obtained the results as shown in Tables No. (3.1),
• the relationship between concentration and absorbance, While the ash values ranged between 9.3 and 12.4 for
• Sample W1 W2 W3 Moisture Content % Ash continent%
• sample (A2), and the lowest weight of (0.9884) in table (2.3) below, also contains 8 –samples from B1 to
• Content %. Sample (A1) which have the highest of The heights percent of Moisture Content % was (11.4)
• Moisture Content (70.9 %), with the lower in both in (B3) and (B6), and the lower percent was
• While the percent of higher ash (12.4%) in sample
• (A6), and the lower percent (9.3%) of the ash While the heights percent of Ash continent% was (10.9)
• Sample W1 W2 W3 Moisture Content % Ash continent%
• In Table 2.4 The results. contains 5- heavy metals with (L.) contain a fairly high content of Na, Ca and Mg
• Studies have shown that the two extracts of polluted In Table 2.4 the results contains 5- heavy metals with
• (Mn) with (257.610) Ppm. 0.66) Ppm. While WHO reading was (0.5) Ppm, so
• (pink color) Type- B. - Arsenic (As), the concentration from (0.11-0.12) Ppm.
• • Arsenic (As), the concentration from (0.11-0.12) Ppm. - Boron (B), the concentration from (3.4 -7.89) Ppm.
• Ppm. While WHO reading (2 Ppm), So the While WHO reading was not detectable, so we cannot
• While WHO reading was not detectable, so we cannot 0.66) Ppm. While WHO reading was (0.5) Ppm, so
• The results of table 2.5. contains 6 heavy metals like Led (Pb), strontium (Sr), Zinc (Zn), vanadium (V) and
• (Ppm), Led (Pb) with (220.353) Ppm, strontium (Sr)
• with (407.771) Ppm, Zinc (Zn) with (213.857) Ppm, The table contains different reading of the value of
• vanadium (V) with (292.401) Ppm and Cadmium (Cd) absorbance (BK) in (nm) one billionth of a meter, for
• with (214.439) Ppm. each heavy meatal, with 8 (A) samples of oleander
• strontium (Sr) was (407.771) Ppm, and the lower - The rang of BK reading for the absorbance value of
• 8-samples value was from (0.02 - 0.03) Ppm. Which
• 8- samples value was from (0.01 - 0.03) nm. Which 8- samples value was (0.01- 0.05) Ppm.
• WHO with (0.01) Ppm. normal rang.
• 8- samples value was from (0.01 - 19.80) Ppm. We 8- samples value was (0.02- 0.03) Ppm. In compare
• • The rang of reading for concentration in (Zn metal) in 8- samples value was (5.24- 11.84) Ppm.
• 8- samples value was from (0.04 – 0.78) Ppm. We cannot guess if we need to compare with WHO,
• • The rang of reading for concentration in (V metal) in 8- samples value was (0.20 - 0.78) Ppm.
• 8- samples value was from (0.00 – 0.01) nm. We cannot In compare with WHO results (3 Ppm) regards more
• 8- samples value was (0.00) nm for six samples, regards because it was not detectable (N.D.) in WHO
• 0.003 Ppm. 8- samples value was (0.00) nm for all, while in WHO
• suitable agent for dysrhythmias and hyperkalemia in poisoning–a study of 170 cases. Forensic Sci
• could be suitable approach for ameliorating of (2016) Oleander poisoning as an example of

Methods (brief)

• and human body. tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS), which is the
• (8). The chemical formula of oleandrin is C32H48O9 and in biological samples, and no information about the
• oleandrin, and bufalin. Due to their similar chemical and its congener oleandrigenin in tissue samples taken
• as vomiting, nausea, and abdominal pain are common at infusion sampled at the death scene. The blood/vitreous
• fluorescence polarization immunoassay for digoxin chromatography with or without mass spectrometry
• It’s even been reported that some have gotten Sample collection
• sick by using a branch of the tree to cook Pink and white oleander leaves Samples were collected
• mouth with a damp cloth to remove any plant remnants. - The sample was dried at room temperature for a week.
• Avoid inducing vomiting or giving anything to drink - Dry weighing of the crucible: about 1 gram of sample
• could exacerbate the situation. Keep the child calm and for a full day. It was then weighed with the sample to
• Do not try to treat poisoning symptoms at home and samples were placed in a burning furnace at 550 C for
• The concentrations of the samples to be analyzed were
• • The ash sample was taken and placed in a standard solutions.
• • Measurements of lead concentration in the samples was calculated and we obtained the results
• Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES). Figure No. Where W1 represents the weight of the sample, W2
• (2.1) ICP-OES device represents the weight of the dry sample, and W3 is the
• with concentrations of 10,5,1,0.1 Pppm (10,5,1,0.1), following samples.
• absorbance of the samples was measured at the We obtained the results as shown in Tables No. (3.1),

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

• Fish — marine, non-predatory (sardines, anchovies, salmon, cod)
• Mercury
• Cadmium
• Lead
• Arsenic
• Nickel
• Chromium

Verification notes

• Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
• Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
• Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
• Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
• HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.