Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Water SA 48(1) 21–31 / Jan 2022 Research paper

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the methylmercury infant-formula research pull.

Page snapshot
Cited by3 pages
Metals measured1
Evidence tierB
Year2022

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the methylmercury infant-formula research pull. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • Part 4: Aligning the modelled and measured aqueous phases
  • Water Research Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, Cape Town, South Africa
  • phase property that can be used to track aqueous-phase changes caused by physical, chemical and biological Received: 22 February 2016
  • processes. Alkalinity is a stoichiometry property of the components in solution (i.e., a linear function of the Accepted: 29 December 2021
  • using the 5-point titration method is described. While several alkalinity titration based methods are available 5-point titration
  • for anaerobic digestion bioprocess monitoring, only the 5-point titration is sufficiently accurate for aqueous-
  • In Part 3 (Ekama and Brouckaert, 2022) of this series, the alignment of the modelling and (CC BY 4.0)
  • is, in turn, represented by species. As pointed out in Part 1 (Brouckaert et al., 2021a), the rate at
  • methanogenesis (Bioprocess 1 in Table 1 of Part 2 – Brouckaert et al., 2021b) in anaerobic digestion
  • the aqueous phase. Note that in this series of papers, species are italicised (e.g. CO32−), while their
  • This paper, Part 4, discusses the measurements needed to characterize the aqueous phase for
  • perspective in Part 1 (Brouckaert et al., 2021a).
  • As discussed in Part 1, speciation modelling, which determines dissolved species concentrations
  • 5 (Brouckaert et al., 2022).
  • The weak acid/base system components are CO32−, NH4+, PO43−, HS− and Ac− (CH3COO−). (The
  • ISSN (online) 1816-7950 21
  • analyser, with which it is difficult to prevent errors due to CO2 loss. affect the aqueous-phase speciation, and hence pH.
  • component concentrations (Eqs 19a and 19b in Part 1 – because equilibrium constant values are well known (unlike the
  • Brouckaert et al., 2021a). bioprocesses, which are usually held in a non-equilibrium state
  • • As discussed in Parts 1 and 2, the changes in aqueous-phase by kinetic factors which require calibration for different reactor
  • direct application as a control parameter for pH-sensitive models (Batstone et al., 2002; Brouckaert et al., 2010; Ikumi et al.,
  • processes such as anaerobic digestion. 2011; Lizarralde et al., 2015; Part 5 – Brouckaert et al., 2022).
  • (Bioprocess 5a in Table 1 of Part 2 – Brouckaert et al., 2021b), and leaving the system, the progress and performance of the
  • sulphide is the e− donor, and is transformed to sulphate; and nitrate bioprocess(es) can be monitored. In Part 3 (Ekama and Brouckaert,
  • is the e− acceptor, and is transformed to nitrogen gas. Sulphate and 2022) this flux/mass balance principle was applied to characterise
  • in the aqueous phase – almost all are in the un-protonated NO3− the characterisation of the aqueous phase through measuring the
  • or SO42− form. The free (H2S) and saline (HS−, S2−) sulphide (FSS) material content entering and exiting bioprocesses, and inferring
  • and free (NH3) and saline (NH4+) ammonia (FSA) are weak acid/ solution composition in terms of model components, is considered.
  • (NH4+, H2S) and partially protonated (HS−, S2−, NH3) forms co- LINKING THE MODELLING AND MEASUREMENT
  • are selected for modelling (Part 1 – Brouckaert et al., 2021a,) and
  • Details of the component selection is outlined in Part 5 (Brouckaert original sample. The usual case is that there is a single substance
  • et al., 2022). The measurement of the weak acid/bases, in particular of interest, the measurement response is assumed linear, and no
  • the inorganic carbon (IC) system via the H2CO3 alkalinity, aligned specific information about the matrix is sought. In the titration
  • As mentioned in Part 1 (Brouckaert et al., 2021a), alkalinity is concentration (CT):
  • pH endpoint, which can be either a fixed value of 3.7, or to
  • H2CO3 alk is then determined by subtracting the alkalinity
  • refer to carbonate alkalinity (H2CO3 alk), phosphate alkalinity
  • (H2PO4− alk), sulphide alkalinity (H2S alk), etc. Note that H2CO3,
  • as discussed in Part 1 (Brouckaert et al., 2021a). Although the • A two-point titration with pH end-points 5.75 and 4.3, to
  • means that they have limited practical application in solution • The 5-point titration that provides more accurate values
  • Characterizing mixed weak acid/base samples procedures, using the solution specified in Table 1 as an example.
  • In aqueous samples with a mixture of n (say 6) weak acid/bases Speciated alkalinity and buffer capacity vs. pH curves for the

Methods (brief)

  • for anaerobic digestion bioprocess monitoring, only the 5-point titration is sufficiently accurate for aqueous-
  • methanogenesis (Bioprocess 1 in Table 1 of Part 2 – Brouckaert et al., 2021b) in anaerobic digestion
  • processes such as anaerobic digestion. 2011; Lizarralde et al., 2015; Part 5 – Brouckaert et al., 2022).
  • Details of the component selection is outlined in Part 5 (Brouckaert original sample. The usual case is that there is a single substance
  • Characterizing mixed weak acid/base samples procedures, using the solution specified in Table 1 as an example.
  • In aqueous samples with a mixture of n (say 6) weak acid/bases Speciated alkalinity and buffer capacity vs. pH curves for the
  • it, one for each weak acid/base system, including the water components during the preparation of the sample for titration is an
  • So in a water sample with a mixture of six weak acid/bases, viz.
  • When the IC system is the only weak acid/base present in a water sample can be calculated by subtracting the subsystem alkalinities
  • sample or the contribution of other weak acid/base systems from Alkt, i.e.:
  • of around 4.5. However, in mixed weak acid/base systems such sample ‘in-situ’ pH (7.00 in Table 1) and the measured total
  • by titrating a sample from the in-situ pH to 5.75 and the TA was
  • from 50 to 4 400 mg/L as CaCO3 (CT from 140 to 1 250 mgC/L) points of the titration are the sample ‘in-situ’ pH, two pH points
  • only for control of ADs, but also for characterizing water samples
  • water samples containing the five (six counting water) weak
  • water sample (Poinapen et al., 2009).
  • The 5-point titration method for sample with pH < 6.7
  • 5-point titration programme will be assigned to the H2CO3 If the AD sample has a pH below the pH of the first pH titration

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
3171d062026-08-02major1 section added
bc84bfc2026-08-02major6 sections added; narrative text revised