Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

probe upon interacting with the target. The sensor was systematically characterized using alternating

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by7 pages
Metals measured4
Evidence tierB
Year2022

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ of 30 µg/L (~126 nM) for uranium in public drinking water in 2003 (6). However, the
  • ivDde group, the resin was mixed with 2% hydrazine in dimethylformamide. All other
  • reverse phase column (30 × 250 mm) using an eluent of 0.1% TFA in water (A) and
  • 80% acetonitrile in water (B). The peptides were eluted with a successive linear gradient of
  • in an electrochemical cell with 2 mL of Phys2 buffer. These sensors were stable for ~10 h,
  • An equilibration time of 47 min was used for all nine data points. The LOD is the lowest
  • s/n = 3) from the signal fluctuation in the absence of the target (27). In addition to U(VI), the
  • 78% SS in the MB peak current. This large signal attenuation alludes to favorable 78%
  • standard solution, which was made in 3% nitric acid. In this case, the initial
  • amount of 3% nitric acid without U(VI) also resulted in a similar change in the MB an
  • equal amountInof 3%
  • is consistent with the behavior of other “signal-off” sensors (40,41). The change in %SS
  • %SS with frequency was also determined for the U-pT-12 sensor. As can be seen in F
  • inset. The LOD for U(VI) was 50 nM, and the dynamic range
  • in the inset. The LOD for U(VI) was 50 nM, and the dynamic range was fro was from
  • was 75%, which(Figure 4B).
  • was 75%, which corresponds to a target recovery rate of 96%. The disparities in pH and Hg(II)
  • a 50% init in
  • be 99% (Figure to hasbeaIt
  • 99% was affinity
  • was 75%, which corresponds to a target recovery rate of 96%. The disparities in pH
  • ionic strength between the pure buffer and the 50% aquifer sample could be the re
  • for drinking water analysis, we tested it in a 50% synthetic drinking water sample
  • The sensor responded well to U(VI) (77% SS), and the target recovery rate was estim
  • to be 99% (Figure 5B). It was also regenerated using the aforementioned method. Ov
  • SPCE (Figure S5). The sensor responded to U(VI), but the signal attenuation (72% SS)
  • recovery was close to 100%. Despite the aforementioned differences, we have demonstrated
  • Table 1 shows the key analytical properties of the U-pT-12 sensor and several pre-
  • Table 1. A comparison of the key analytical properties of the U-pT-12 sensor and other U(VI) sensors
    1. Wu, Y.; Lai, R.Y. An electrochemical gold(III) sensor with high sensitivity and tunable dynamic range. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88,

Methods (brief)

  • and Cr(VI). Its reusability and ability to function in diluted aquifer and drinking water samples were
  • mass spectrometry (7,8), UV spectrophotometry (9–11), fluorescence spectroscopy (12),
  • have achieved low limit of detections (LODs), they either require multistep detection
  • cost-effective, and compatible with complex sample matrices.
  • samples (23,24). While there are many examples of DNA (E-DNA)-based metal ion sensors,
  • complex samples in a simple and cost-effective manner. It also highlights the benefits
  • non-standard and non-protein AAs, in designing metal ion sensors (35).
  • 50% synthetic aquifer and drinking water samples. The synthetic aquifer sample contained
  • sample was subsequently diluted with a Phys2 buffer in a 1:1 ratio. The synthetic tap
  • water sample contained 30 mg L−1 calcium, 0.02 mg L−1 iron, 9.0 mg L−1 magnesium,
  • 0.14 mg L−1 phosphorous (38). This sample was further diluted with a 2x Phys2 buffer in a
  • first coupled to an insoluble resin support, followed by the remaining AAs, and a
  • ether. The crude materials were purified by preparative HPLC on a Kromasil 100-10-C18
  • purified peptides were lyophilized. This one-step purification by reverse-phase HPLC was
  • An equilibration time of 47 min was used for all nine data points. The LOD is the lowest
  • inset. The LOD for U(VI) was 50 nM, and the dynamic range
  • in the inset. The LOD for U(VI) was 50 nM, and the dynamic range was fro was from
  • Kd was estimatedmatedto be 971(±147)

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised