Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

A Low-Cost Method Shows Potentially Toxic Element Levels

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by6 pages
Metals measured4
Evidence tierB
Year2022

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • try (7). Mean BLL was 42.6 ± 22.5 µg/dL (range 16.6–85.4) in the exposed group versus
  • 8.7 ± 1.2 µg/dL (range 7.0–10.2) in the control group, a statistically significant difference
  • (p < 0.001) (7). In addition, 80.0% of the exposed group had a history of lead smelting activi-
  • ties within the home to produce artificial jewelry, compared with only 35.7% of controls (7).
  • workers had blood Pb concentrations > 40 µg/dL (8). Moreover, in Indonesia, 69.5% of the
  • addition of 10 mL of 32.5% m/v nitric acid and heated to a high temperature in a microwave
  • lene tube with plastic forceps and 12 mL of 65% m/v nitric acid, 2 mL of 35% m/v hydrogen
  • portable X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer (NitonTM XL2® ). Not all of the exposed families
  • were assigned a value of LOD/2 (24).
  • such as acid and soldering powder (23.8%), acid and soldering wire (23.8%), and soldering
  • powder alone (47.6%). Furthermore, only 19.0% of the workers who engaged in soldering
  • face shields, gloves, and protective clothing. Overall, 42.9% of the welders stated that they
  • open air. A total of 80.9% of welders stated that they worked in living rooms, bedrooms,
  • laundry rooms, and backyards, as shown in Table 1. In 42.9% of households, welding
  • workstation dust, except for Sn (p < 0.05) (Table 2).
  • Pb <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD - 0.06 0.13 -
  • The PTE concentrations in Table 2 were calculated based on the area cleansed for
  • Cd (geometric mean (GM): 53,927.21 ppm; standard deviation (SD): 32,806.44 ppm; range:
  • 5209.72–165,296.14 ppm), Cr (GM: 4115.78 ppm; SD: 2810.68 ppm; range: 465.31–14,550.51 ppm),
  • Mn (GM: 1161.33 ppm; SD: 460.50 ppm; range: 1050.71–1471.06 ppm) and Ni (GM: 524.22 ppm;
  • value of Pb (GM: 249,973.13 ppm; SD: 165,157.41 ppm; range: 5840.90–522,785.34 ppm) was
  • Cd 53,927 32,806 5209–165,296 <LOD <LOD <LOD
  • Ni 524 291 102–1015 <LOD <LOD <LOD
  • Cr 4115 2810 465–14,550 <LOD <LOD <LOD
  • Pb <LOD <LOD <LOD 249,973 165,157 5,840–522,785
  • heterogeneous (Table 4). The correlation of PTE determined in dust deposits (cleaning
  • and 15 control children aged 1–11 years. The mean age of the exposed group was 6 years
  • (range: 1–11 years) comprising 4 females and 10 males, whereas the mean age of the control
  • group was 6 years (range: 2–11 years) comprising 8 females and 7 males, showing the
  • groups, as shown in Table 5.
  • Table 4. p-Values of Spearman correlations between PTE levels in dust samples and physical infrastructure by group. Limeira, Brazil, 2019.
  • Pb <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD 0.30 >0.05 −0.19 >0.05 0.24 >0.05 0.26 >0.05
  • a Dust collected for approximately 14 days after installation of EDC. b Dust collected from welders’ workstations. <LOD—Below limit of detection. <0.05 represents the statistically
  • Mean SD 95th Percentile Mean SD 95th Percentile Mean SD 95th Percentile p-Value *
  • Cr (µg/L) 1.62 0.42 2.30 (95) 1.49 0.39 2.05 (95) 1.55 0.40 2.27 (95) >0.05
  • Ni (µg/L) 3.35 1.03 5.05 (95) 3.23 0.68 4.13 (95) 3.28 0.85 4.81 (95) >0.05
  • As (µg/L) 0.40 0.19 0.78 (95) 0.34 0.22 0.62 (95) 0.37 0.21 0.83 (95) >0.05
  • Cd (µg/L) 0.11 0.11 0.30 (95) 0.01 0.01 0.02 (95) 0.06 0.10 0.26 (95) <0.05
  • Sn (µg/L) 6.42 20.99 28.51 (95) 0.80 0.23 1.08 (95) 3.61 14.85 1.12 (95) >0.05
  • 0.001 µg/L; Exposed 0.011 µg/L) and Pb (mean: Control 1.31 µg/dL; Exposed 3.31 µg/dL).
  • neurological symptoms of seizures (n = 12) and drowsiness (n = 3), and mean blood lead
  • level of cases was 42.6 ± 22.5 µg/dL (range 16.6–85.4 µg/dL) proving significantly higher in

Methods (brief)

  • samples were collected in 21 exposed and 23 control families using EDC from surfaces where dust
  • deposits had accumulated for approximately 14 days. In exposed families, dust samples were also
  • Toxic Element Levels in Dust collected from welders’ workstations. PTE concentrations were then determined using inductively
  • Correlated with Elevated Blood coupled mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The results raised concerns in relation to Cr, As, and Cd
  • Environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. conclusion, analyzing dust collected using EDC proved a potentially low-cost tool for determining
  • had high blood lead levels > 10 µg/dL (9). Also, dust and blood samples of pottery artisans,
  • collection of blood, urine, and whole saliva samples from informal workers of Limeira, and
  • DustSample Collection
  • Dust samples were ® cloths. One EDC was
  • sampleswerewerecollected
  • collection ofofthe samples (Figure
  • samples were duplicate,in
  • were collected labeled
  • In addition, surface dust samples were collected directly from welders’ workstations.
  • All of the materials used for sample collection and transport, such as the folders, were
  • 2.3. Dust Sample Preparation and Chemical Analysis
  • The sample preparation involved acid extraction with a microwave oven (Ethos UP
  • model, Milestone). Each EDC sample was cut into four parts with stainless steel scissors

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised