Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Long Term Risks to Neonatal Health from Exposure to

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by9 pages
Metals measured5
Evidence tierB
Year2020

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • 1.8% and from 1.1 to 7.9%, values remaining stable in 2019. Negative outcomes at birth in 2016 up to
  • unexplored. Meanwhile exposures to metal delivering weaponry have been and are extensive (24–28),
  • 25% of births of the Gaza Strip. Catchment areas were the Gaza governorate (66% in 2011, and 72% in
  • less than 0.25% in other areas of the Strip of Gaza. Stability of residence since 2014 was also recorded.
  • of items from rubble. All analyses were restricted to singleton births (twin births were less than 2%).
  • Descriptive data of the register in 2018–2019 are reported in Table 1 for each outcome at birth
  • from this Table, because they had less than 0.5% prevalence in the whole cohort—maternal cigarette or
  • omitted since it was used by about 100% in each group of outcomes.
  • Notes: Table 1 Descriptive data of the register 2018–2019. N = number of subjects; % = percentages calculated on
  • Table 2 shows that the most substantial increase in the prevalence of P, LBW and BD outcomes
  • Supplementary File 2, Table S1 shows the result of the logistic regression analysis, evaluating
  • the association of the features in Table 1 with the type of birth outcome. Low weight at birth (LBW),
  • for LBW by multivariable logistic regression analysis (Table 3).
  • Table 2. Prevalence of outcomes at birth in the years 2011, 2016 and 2018–2019.
  • than 28 weeks gestation.* Total live born = 4765, ** total delivered babies = 4830.
  • of the BD were sporadic and new events. By multivariable logistic regression analysis (Table 3) only
  • were validated by multivariable logistic regression analysis (Table 3). Univariable and multivariable
  • analyses were conducted on singletons. Twins represented less than 3% in each year and none of them
  • Table 3. Association between singleton babies with birth defects, preterm and of low birth weight at
  • OR = Odds Ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence intervals. * Forward selection. Only predictors with at least 10 observation
  • 4–5 months. The metals shown in Tables 4 and 5 include 12 of the 23 tested for, and include those
  • 2015 and 2016. The cohort for which metal analysis was done in 2015 was of 502 women (93% mothers
  • of normal babies, 4% of BD, 3% of preterm; 68% of them were exposed to attacks and related events);
  • in 2016 the cohort included 78 women (34.6% mothers of normal babies, 33.3% of BD and 32% of
  • tested (27% mothers of normal babies, 37% BD and 36% preterm; 45% of them exposed to attacks and
  • related events). Table 4 shows the comparison of the 95th percentile values in ppm of metal load in the
  • values of the load in metals in the cohorts of mothers (in Table 5) shows a trend of increase in time for
  • Table 4. Together, they point to high contamination of the environment by heavy metals war-remnants
  • Table 4. 95th percentile values of metal concentration in ppm in the hair of Gaza mothers at delivery and in reference cohort outside war areas.
  • Metal N 95th pct 95% CI N 95th pct 95% CI N 95th pct 95% CI * Ref.
  • N, number of tested samples. 95th pct = 95th percentile; 95%CI: 95% confidence intervals of 95th pct. Ref. = Reference values. * For the 2018–2019 estimates, the upper confidence limit
  • Table 5. Comparison of the median metal concentration in hair of the cohort of mothers by period.
  • tested for metal contaminants included in 2015 68% of women that recalled exposure to the 2014
  • attacks; in the 2016 cohort 40% of women recalled exposure to attacks and in 2018 these were 44%.
  • photographically documented and 88% of the women in 2018–2019 had remained since these attacks in
  • and median values are shown in Tables 4 and 5, varied over the years—in 2015 the cohort included
  • a lesser percentage of BD and preterm (total 7%) than in 2016 (total 65.3% BD and preterm) and in
  • births with the mother’s recall of exposures to attacks in 2014, stable residence since in the same
  • than 50% in 2016 to 9% in 2018–2019. Thus, the only environmental associations found for birth defect
  • had no association with negative outcomes in 2016 and were always in the range of values of reference
  • About 50% of perinatal deaths in Gaza are due to preterm birth and BD; the rise of prevalence
  • from a total of 2.2 % in 2011 to 9.5% since 2016, and ongoing, of babies born with these conditions

Methods (brief)

  • By ICP/MS analysis we determined the content of 23 metals in mothers’ hair. Appropriate statistical
  • were not well documented and followed up. Since 200, we collected a number of environmental clues
  • utero to newborns after a mother’s exposure to attacks (22). We collected retrospective evidence of
  • sample collection has been described before (29,30).
  • a doctor, in 2016, 2017 and 2018–2019. Data were collected uninterruptedly (24/24 hours and 7/7 days)
  • 2.4. Hair Samples and Metal Load Determination
  • baby, 23 with BD and 24 with a preterm baby, born in sequence, as much as possible (some samples
  • same as with previous tastings, using ICP/MS, in 3 runs and with the same protocol for analysis as
  • a reference (44). We have analyzed a subgroup of the hair collected from women at delivery. In 2015
  • we could analyze a larger number of samples, while in 2016 and 2018–2019 we analyzed a similar
  • number of hairs collected sequentially from mothers with normal, BD or preterm babies, being unable
  • comparison of data collected at different times. The prevalence of low birth at term, preterm and
  • insufficient sample size.
  • We analyzed for heavy metal content the hair collected at delivery from mothers each year.
  • load higher in Gaza than that of the reference sample outside war areas. The comparison of the median
  • N, number of tested samples. 95th pct = 95th percentile; 95%CI: 95% confidence intervals of 95th pct. Ref. = Reference values. * For the 2018–2019 estimates, the upper confidence limit
  • held at maximum of sample due to the small sample size. Highlighted in blue, are the values significantly higher than those in the reference samples from area not involved in military
  • the lack of energy for cryopreservation of the needed fresh bioptic samples, and of supplies for the

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised