Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Dental amalgam is a mixture of approximately 50% mercury and varying ratios

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by4 pages
Metals measured3
Evidence tierB
Year2019

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • Dental amalgam is a mixture of approximately 50% mercury and varying ratios
  • pollution because it is readily absorbed through 90-100% vapour and the oral
  • chemical composition. Some contain alcohol, which can reach up to 27% in volume, while others
  • the transfer of an aqueous silver nitrate solution (80 ml aqueous) containing 5 wt % of AgNO3 to
  • dry for about 24 hours. Table -1 demonstrates the designed additives of amalgam/ PVA composite
  • Table 1-The designed compositions for amalgam/ PVA composite material
  • manufacturing process of amalgam/ PVA composite material on the chemical activity (w/w % H2O) of
  • revealed the highest chemical resistance (i.e., 0.1–0.5%) to an artificial saliva solution (of pH = 7 or
  • manufactured material. Pure amalgam showed a low chemical resistance (0–0.01%) to the acidic
  • solution (pH= 6.2); other solutions reached 0–45%, while the optimal sample reached 20%.

Methods (brief)

  • molded and cured to give the final product. New samples were used for the
  • mechanical properties of the composite samples, (2) composite scanning and images
  • scanning for samples before and after the modification process, using the same auxiliary used for the
  • Am, USA instrument) for prepared samples of 1cm thickness and 3cm diameter under the conditions
  • of the lab (30ºC). The sample was introduced between two disks made of copper which were then
  • heated. The change in temperature for the sample and the two disks until the falling down of the
  • sample was then used by the following equations to calculate the thermal conductivity K:
  • percentage, absorbency values, and chemical resistance in each sample, and to check which of the
  • samples was more chemically stable than the others (optimum one). For these purposes, the following
  • Where: Wi, and Wd estimate the weight for samples initially and after immersion in distilled water
  • thermal stability was observed with sample 3, which consisted of a 67: 33 (weight: weight ratio) of
  • (after 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hrs). Sample three (a weight:weight ratio of 67:33 of PVA: MAg)
  • solution (pH= 6.2); other solutions reached 0–45%, while the optimal sample reached 20%.

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised