Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Assessment of Heavy Metals in Indoor

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by4 pages
Metals measured1
Evidence tierB
Year2015

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • matrix also shows positive correlation between the possible metal pairs at 95% level of confi-
  • the afternoon the temperature can soar to as high as 30˚C (86˚F), while the relative humidity drops under 10%
  • tion and analysis. The various sample locations and their respective office codes are listed in Table 1.
  • Table 1. Sampling site characteristics including geographic coordinates (decimal degrees), elevation, site classification and
  • deviations and bar charts. Table 2 shows indoor settled dust loading (g/m2) for all the sample locations during
  • tled dust were fairly uniform (4.475 - 6.533 g/m2) throughout all the sampling sites as depicted in Table 2. Dust
  • unintentional hand to mouth contact or by inhalation of dust (19). However, the overall mean of dust loading
  • showing the relationship (at 0.05 level of significance) between the metals under study is depicted in Table 3,
  • while Table 4 shows Comparison of heavy metal concentration (mg/kg) in dust samples found in the present
  • Table 2. Indoor dust loading within the University of Agriculture Makurdi.
  • Table 3. Correlation matrix for heavy metal concentrations.
  • Table 4. Heavy metal concentrations (mg/kg) in comparison with reported studies.
  • area ranges from 0.2372 - 0.7152 mg/kg. The highest concentration was recorded at the College of Engineering
  • Fe ranges from 293.6 - 884.9, with the highest value recorded at the College of Science (SC) while the lowest
  • ment ranges from 4.265 - 68.55 mg/kg, with the highest value recorded at the College of Sciences (SC) while
  • in the range of 4.239 - 42.53 mg/kg as shown in Figure 5. Zn concentration was highest at the College of Agri-
  • The Pearson correlation matrix for heavy metal concentration in studied samples as shown in Table 3 indicates
  • positive correlation between all the possible pairs of heavy metals at 95% confidence level. High positive corre-
  • Table 4 shows the comparison between the concentrations of heavy metals in indoor settled harmattan dust from

Methods (brief)

  • kurdi were collected between November, 2014 to March, 2015 (five months) using the wipe sam-
  • pling methodology. Gravimetric measurement of the dust samples from all the sample locations
  • this study. AAS analysis of the dust samples shows that heavy metal concentrations (mg/kg dry
  • wipe samples were collected according to the American Society for Testing and Material, ASTM E1728 proto-
  • pling sites. Before weighing, the samples were equilibrated in desiccators at 20˚C - 30˚C in a humidity con-
  • trolled room for 24 h (16). This was to prevent any possible error in the mass of samples as a result of available
  • study area. Outdoor settled dust samples were also collected from the vicinities of sampled College buildings
  • the nine Colleges of the University) were selected at random for this study. A total of 210 wipe samples of in-
  • door settled dust were collected from office desks (900 cm2) and ceiling fan blades (100 cm2 each) not pre-
  • viously rusted. While a total of 30 samples of outdoor settled dust was collected from three locations A, B and C
  • within the vicinities of the sampled College buildings during the same period to serve as control. In each College
  • building sampled, one field blank tissue paper was exposed to all handling procedures used for the samples with
  • mediately following completion of sampling, all wipe samples were transported back to the laboratory for diges-
  • tion and analysis. The various sample locations and their respective office codes are listed in Table 1.
  • College Building Sample Code Coordinate Coordinate
  • ance. Dust loading for each sample location was obtained using the following mathematical expression:
  • After digestion, the contents in the beaker, upon cooling was then transferred quantitatively into a 50 mL volu-
  • and stored in polypropylene bottles prior to heavy metals analysis. 0.5 g of dust samples from each of the control

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised