White bread in the HMI library has 125 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, uranium, Co and Cu from 10 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source →6Lead Levels in the Most Consumed Mexican Foods: First Monitoring EffortToxicsRead source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury and nickel and others, in 125 results from 10 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →
-
Main drivers:
Form, basis and where the white bread was sampled; reporting limits decide how many results are non-detects.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →
White bread overview
White bread in the HMI library has 125 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, uranium, Co and Cu from 10 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source →6Lead Levels in the Most Consumed Mexican Foods: First Monitoring EffortToxicsRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in white bread, as sold from 1,127 results in 3 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 5.5 to 60 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, white bread, as sold had a median lead result below 4 µg/kg across 27 composites from 2017–2020.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 2.5 µg/kg (Spungen et al. 2024) to 25.3 µg/kg (Marín et al. 2018).3Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → For cadmium, 2 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 16.4 µg/kg (Marín et al. 2018) to 27 µg/kg (Spungen et al. 2024).3Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the white bread came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as white bread
This page covers white bread in 2 forms kept separate in every comparison: white bread, as sold (118 results) and white bread, cooked (7 results).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source →6Lead Levels in the Most Consumed Mexican Foods: First Monitoring EffortToxicsRead source →
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of white bread
The table holds every extracted white bread result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 125 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source →6Lead Levels in the Most Consumed Mexican Foods: First Monitoring EffortToxicsRead source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
38 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 7 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded.
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of white bread, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 29 findings from 7 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
107 of 107 findings · 12 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
23 findings · 7 studies · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2015 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2012–2018 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2019 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2016 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2010 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2004–2014 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2008 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2001 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 13.3 µg/kg (minimum); 36.2 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
| White bread, as soldSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| White bread, as soldSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| White bread, as soldAl 2010 | Cereal and cereal products, Riyadh city markets, May 20092009Dry weight | mean. | ||
| White bread, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | Cereals (retail, Mexico City)2022–2023Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| White bread, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 7.1 µg/kg (minimum); 24.4 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| White bread, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| White bread, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| White bread, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2014 | median. | ||
| White bread, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008 | median. | ||
23 findings · 6 studies · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2015 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2012–2019 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2018 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000–2006 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2016 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2010 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO1999–2018 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2014 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2008 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2001 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 14.3 µg/kg (minimum); 18.6 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
| White bread, as soldSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| White bread, as soldSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| White bread, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | all samples (single foodstuff, duplicate mean)2022–2023Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| White bread, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | all samples (single foodstuff, duplicate mean)2022–2023Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| White bread, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 17.2 µg/kg (minimum); 36 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| White bread, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| White bread, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| White bread, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006 | median. | ||
| White bread, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2017 | median. | ||
| White bread, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008 | median. | ||
14 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2008 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2015 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2014 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000–2014 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2002–2010 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2004–2014 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2008 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2001 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 12.6 µg/kg (minimum); 19.8 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
| White bread, as soldEFSA 2021 | EU occurrence data (LB)2013–2018Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| White bread, as soldEFSA 2021 | EU occurrence data (UB)2013–2018Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| White bread, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008 | median. | ||
7 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2009 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 2.4 µg/kg (minimum); 10.2 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
12 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2013 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2008 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000–2001 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2014 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2008 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2001 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)1998–2000 | not detected. | ||
| White bread, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Whitehorse composite (retail Jan-Feb 1998)1998–2000 | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| White bread, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008 | median. | ||
4 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
4 findings · 3 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 63.7 µg/kg (minimum); 135 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2008 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
7 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2008 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2001 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2000 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (minimum); 1,720 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| White bread, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| White bread, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 1,220 µg/kg (minimum); 1,450 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| White bread, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI white bread Pb reference · White bread, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI white bread Pb reference · White bread, as sold. White bread, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤4 | ≤5.3 | 4.5–17 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤4 | ≤5 | 4.2–10 (bounded) |
110 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 56 | 50% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 54 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white bread, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:white-bread-52387fd86854:4a6bdfd5ef2f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white bread Pb reference · White bread, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI white bread Pb reference · White bread, cooked. White bread, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2.13 | 2.95 | 5 |
| Alternative weighting | 2.13 | 2.95 | 5 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white bread, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for white bread, cooked on this basis in the completed white bread ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:white-bread-fbfa4bd8645a:9f5f632a1bdd
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white bread Cd reference · White bread, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI white bread Cd reference · White bread, as sold. White bread, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 17.5–18 (bounded) | 21–22 (bounded) | 26 |
| Alternative weighting | 17–18 (bounded) | 21–22 (bounded) | 26 |
119 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 65 | 50% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 54 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white bread, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:white-bread-d41e564a35b8:06627901ef53
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white bread Cd reference · White bread, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI white bread Cd reference · White bread, cooked. White bread, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 14.5 | 22 | 27.2 |
| Alternative weighting | 14.5 | 22 | 27.2 |
7 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 7 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white bread, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for white bread, cooked on this basis in the completed white bread ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:white-bread-337803853567:2b55751d263c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white bread tAs reference · White bread, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI white bread tAs reference · White bread, as sold. White bread, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2.98–5.1 (bounded) | 5.45–6.85 (bounded) | 7.5–17.6 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤4.9 | 4.8–6.7 (bounded) | 6.9–16.6 (bounded) |
81 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 27 | 50% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 54 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white bread, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:white-bread-1007302e4a81:c9b30ec82f9f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white bread iAs reference · White bread, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI white bread iAs reference · White bread, as sold. White bread, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.03 | ≤3.5 | 3.5 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.03 | ≤3.5 | 3.5–10 (bounded) |
5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 5 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white bread, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for white bread, as sold on this basis in the completed white bread ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:white-bread-82e67069c4c1:bb6b66268257
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white bread tHg reference · White bread, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI white bread tHg reference · White bread, as sold. White bread, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.19 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.185 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
85 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 29 | 33% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 54 | 33% |
| Dabeka et al. 2003 | 2 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white bread, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:white-bread-5d936756ed29:f4cd9b98852f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white bread Ni reference · White bread, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI white bread Ni reference · White bread, as sold. White bread, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 62 | 74.5 | 88 |
| Alternative weighting | 62 | 74 | 88 |
54 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 54 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white bread, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for white bread, as sold on this basis in the completed white bread ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:white-bread-cf525fce2f1f:82c0b680acba
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white bread Cr reference · White bread, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI white bread Cr reference · White bread, as sold. White bread, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
54 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 54 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white bread, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for white bread, as sold on this basis in the completed white bread ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:white-bread-66d5c627a4d7:ecf26ef27884
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white bread Al reference · White bread, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI white bread Al reference · White bread, as sold. White bread, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1800 | 2080 | 2350 |
| Alternative weighting | 1800 | 2080 | 2350 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white bread, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for white bread, as sold on this basis in the completed white bread ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:white-bread-46d8870ad783:f546bfde2e85
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white bread Sn reference · White bread, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI white bread Sn reference · White bread, as sold. White bread, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | 6–11 (bounded) | 7.14–11.8 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤8.57 | 6.57–11.4 (bounded) | 9.47–35.9 (bounded) |
5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 5 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white bread, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for white bread, as sold on this basis in the completed white bread ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:white-bread-00ed77b1b347:193f10d8c2ea
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white bread U reference · White bread, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI white bread U reference · White bread, as sold. White bread, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1.4 | 2.1 | 5.2 |
| Alternative weighting | 1.4 | 2.1 | 5.2 |
54 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 54 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white bread, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for white bread, as sold on this basis in the completed white bread ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:white-bread-a2da5aea011d:2c2f21192d22
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
No medians or sample values exist for this form and metal, so no HMI reference could be built.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
Reporting limits overlap the study comparison, so no direction can be shown.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach white bread
No study in the library compared white bread from contaminated and ordinary settings, so the routes by which metals reach it are not measured here.
Which forms and regions measured lower
The HMI reference for lead in white bread, as sold pools 110 subgroup units from 2 sampling families, with a median of below 5.3 µg/kg and a middle half spanning below 4 (lower quartile) and between 4.5 and 17 µg/kg (upper quartile).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source → For lead in white bread, cooked, the reference median was 2.95 µg/kg, with a middle half from 2.13 to 5 µg/kg across 4 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium in white bread, as sold, the reference median was between 21 and 22 µg/kg, with a middle half from between 17.5 and 18 to 26 µg/kg across 119 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, white bread, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in WPRO (5.5 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (60 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in WPRO (13 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (20.3 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For total arsenic, the lowest regional median was in EURO (21.4 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (25.1 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Targeted white bread, as sold samples in WPRO had lead lower at 6.5 µg/kg, against 7.5 µg/kg for WPRO in the same study.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In another study, targeted white bread, as sold samples in WPRO had cadmium lower at 7.57 µg/kg, against 13 µg/kg for WPRO in the same study.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
Processed or prepared forms were compared only with unprocessed white bread in the same study and group. White bread, cooked (WPRO) had lead higher at 8.54 µg/kg, against 6.5 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (white bread, as sold).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Forms differ in water content, so a per-kilogram difference is not by itself a measured removal or gain of metal.
Mitigation for white bread
Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.
No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing white bread for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 1 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 3,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 1 µg/kg (FDA Total Diet Study) to 63.2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 3 µg/kg (FDA Total Diet Study) to 4,320 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying white bread
No maximum level for metals in white bread was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from white bread
No source in the library converted white bread concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names white bread was decided on its content: 10 occurrence extracted, 10 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
White bread FAQs
What heavy metals are found in white bread?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, uranium, Co and Cu in white bread, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in white bread, as sold from 1,127 results in 3 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 5.5 to 60 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in white bread?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, white bread, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in WPRO (5.5 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (60 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in WPRO (13 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (20.3 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Does processing change heavy metals in white bread?
Only comparisons between forms in the same study are available, not before-and-after measurements of the same white bread.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → White bread, cooked (WPRO) had lead higher at 8.54 µg/kg, against 6.5 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (white bread, as sold).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How much of the arsenic in white bread is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 9 results from 2 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →3Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source → Marín et al. 2018 reported inorganic arsenic at 6.7 µg/kg (mean) in white bread, as sold from Cereals.3Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsDataset
- Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Peer-reviewed
- Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Peer-reviewed
- Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakePeer-reviewed
- Lead Levels in the Most Consumed Mexican Foods: First Monitoring EffortPeer-reviewed
Sources
Browse White bread Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every white bread record in the library: 10 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.
