Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index
Bowls of dry chickpeas and plain cooked chickpeas illustrating chickpeas ingredient context.

Heavy metals in Chickpeas

Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic and total mercury in chickpeas: monitoring results, studies, references by form and basis, limits, testing and controls.

Quick read

Chickpeas in the HMI library has 148 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, tin, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, Se and Mo from 11 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Al Zabadi H, Sayeh G, Jodeh S · 2018Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAgriculture & Food Security 7:50Read source →4Spungen JH, et al. · 2024Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Alsabagh AAA · 2025Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →6Unknown authors · 2020healthy eating patterns should include a variety of vegetables from all five of the Access this article onlinePeer-reviewed articleRead source →

Chickpeas overview

Chickpeas in the HMI library has 148 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, tin, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, Se and Mo from 11 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Al Zabadi H, Sayeh G, Jodeh S · 2018Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAgriculture & Food Security 7:50Read source →4Spungen JH, et al. · 2024Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Alsabagh AAA · 2025Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →6Unknown authors · 2020healthy eating patterns should include a variety of vegetables from all five of the Access this article onlinePeer-reviewed articleRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in chickpeas, as sold from 406 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.4 to 18 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, chickpeas, canned had a median lead result below 4 µg/kg across 1 composite from 2020.2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →

Akçay et al. 2023 reported lead at 379 µg/kg (mean ± 12.8 SD) in chickpeas, cooked from market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products).7Akçay Kulluk D, Gökmen F, Dursun N, Özcan MM, Lemiashonak V · 2023Characterization of Heavy Metals in Some Edible Dried Fruits and Nuts Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission SpectroscopyErwerbs-Obstbau (Springer); accepted 26 November 2022; volume and pages not printed in the filed PDFRead source → Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported cadmium means and medians with the basis not stated ranged from 6.3 µg/kg (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022) to 92 µg/kg (Akçay et al. 2023).7Akçay Kulluk D, Gökmen F, Dursun N, Özcan MM, Lemiashonak V · 2023Characterization of Heavy Metals in Some Edible Dried Fruits and Nuts Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission SpectroscopyErwerbs-Obstbau (Springer); accepted 26 November 2022; volume and pages not printed in the filed PDFRead source →8Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives · 2022Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentWHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA)Read source →

For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the chickpeas came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.

What counts as chickpeas

This page covers chickpeas in 3 forms kept separate in every comparison: chickpeas, canned (65 results), chickpeas, as sold (55 results) and chickpeas, cooked (28 results).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Al Zabadi H, Sayeh G, Jodeh S · 2018Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAgriculture & Food Security 7:50Read source →4Spungen JH, et al. · 2024Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Alsabagh AAA · 2025Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →6Unknown authors · 2020healthy eating patterns should include a variety of vegetables from all five of the Access this article onlinePeer-reviewed articleRead source →

Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.

Heavy metal contamination profile of chickpeas

The table holds every extracted chickpeas result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 148 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Al Zabadi H, Sayeh G, Jodeh S · 2018Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAgriculture & Food Security 7:50Read source →4Spungen JH, et al. · 2024Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Alsabagh AAA · 2025Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →6Unknown authors · 2020healthy eating patterns should include a variety of vegetables from all five of the Access this article onlinePeer-reviewed articleRead source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

33 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 0 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 2 values from 1 source failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.5Alsabagh AAA · 2025Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →

Comparison methods and scope

Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of chickpeas, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.

About this table
Food formCollection scopeFindingComparisonEvidence
Chickpeas findings from monitoring programmes, total diet studies and every extracted field, market and contaminated-site study, in µg/kg with each source’s form, basis, statistic and censoring retained.
Food formCollection scopeFinding (µg/kg)ComparisonEvidence
12 findings · 4 studies
Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2020As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018all 4 cansCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 1 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 2 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 3 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 4 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020As sold / freshnot detected.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
17 findings · 3 studies
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2001–2003As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013–2014As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2016As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2016As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldauthors 2020all samples, traditional supermarkets, BenghaziCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshnot detected.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2012–2015Dry weightmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2012Dry weightmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2011–2015Dry weightmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C8), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C8), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
4 findings · 1 study
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
12 findings · 4 studies
Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2020As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018all 4 cansCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 1 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 2 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 3 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 4 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020As sold / freshmean.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
19 findings · 4 studies
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEMRO2016–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2006As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2006As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2006As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2006As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldauthors 2020all samples, traditional supermarkets, BenghaziCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshnot detected.
Chickpeas, as soldCantoral et al. 2024all samples (single foodstuff, duplicate mean)2022–2023Basis not statedsample value.
Chickpeas, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
4 findings · 1 study
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2020As sold / freshmedian.
8 findings · 2 studies
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2023As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2011–2012As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2020–2023As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2020As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2020–2022As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldauthors 2020all samples, traditional supermarkets, BenghaziCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshnot detected.
2 findings · 1 study
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2019As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2016As sold / freshmedian.
1 finding · 1 study
Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2020As sold / freshmedian.
4 findings · 2 studies
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2012As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005As sold / freshmedian.
Chickpeas, as soldauthors 2020all samples, traditional supermarkets, BenghaziCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshnot detected.
1 finding · 1 study
Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2020As sold / freshmedian.
2 findings · 1 study
Chickpeas, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C8), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C8), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
4 findings · 1 study
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2020As sold / freshmedian.
4 findings · 1 study
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005As sold / freshmedian.
1 finding · 1 study
Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2020As sold / freshmedian.
5 findings · 1 study
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
4 findings · 1 study
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
11 findings · 3 studies
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018all 4 cansCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 1 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 2 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 3 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 4 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedKorfali et al. 2013chickpeas, Lebanese manufactureCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmax.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
2 findings · 1 study
Chickpeas, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C8), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C8), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
5 findings · 1 study
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
5 findings · 1 study
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
10 findings · 2 studies
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018all 4 cansCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 1 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 2 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 3 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018chickpeas retail can 4 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
4 findings · 1 study
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
4 findings · 1 study
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Shared dataset methods and interpretation

Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.

HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, canned

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤4≤4≤4
Alternative weighting≤4≤4≤4

2 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study150%
Spungen et al. 2024150%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-586a565e9699:c692b8a4fffe

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference285037004200
Alternative weighting285037004200

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20254100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-f32e9038d7a4:18572b79363e

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, as sold. Chickpeas, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤10.3≤201.2–50 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤10.5≤20≤50

36 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food36100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-cce444249083:f430d40a419a

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, as sold, dry weight. Chickpeas, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤5≤7.5≤10
Alternative weighting≤3.8≤52.3–10 (bounded)

6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food6100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-0bc2c642dd4e:f8ba7be1ce5d

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Cd reference · Chickpeas, canned

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Cd reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference1.31.31.3
Alternative weighting1.31.31.3

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study1100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-c2e3b3c754cb:880b8b6cfca7

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Cd reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Cd reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference200200400
Alternative weighting200200400

5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20255100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-a9067ccb09f3:bc461673e8cf

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Cd reference · Chickpeas, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Cd reference · Chickpeas, as sold. Chickpeas, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤5≤104.6–12 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤4.60.25–10 (bounded)12–13 (bounded)

35 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food35100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-6cd1ebe10327:4979f03659bc

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas tAs reference · Chickpeas, canned

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas tAs reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference4.94.94.9
Alternative weighting4.94.94.9

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study1100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-4ef35b4d4e9f:8ae512332d9b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas tAs reference · Chickpeas, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas tAs reference · Chickpeas, as sold. Chickpeas, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤25.5≤41.822–59.3 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤27≤43.520–85 (bounded)

24 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food24100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-655bf68d70ca:af3427936cf9

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas iAs reference · Chickpeas, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas iAs reference · Chickpeas, as sold. Chickpeas, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤10.45.21–15.2 (bounded)10.4–20 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤10.45.21–15.2 (bounded)10.4–20 (bounded)

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-b51bf272b50f:0c525c8c6179

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas tHg reference · Chickpeas, canned

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas tHg reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1≤1≤1
Alternative weighting≤1≤1≤1

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study1100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-1f25d907c74d:8a48e8aaafbc

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas tHg reference · Chickpeas, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas tHg reference · Chickpeas, as sold. Chickpeas, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤5≤6.35≤50
Alternative weighting≤5≤6.35≤50

10 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food10100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-34ba4bbb552f:c673f81b63f2

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Ni reference · Chickpeas, canned

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Ni reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference180180180
Alternative weighting180180180

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study1100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-8ceea32d286b:dde7115eb9c4

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Cr reference · Chickpeas, canned

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Cr reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤50≤50≤50
Alternative weighting≤50≤50≤50

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study1100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-c5dbc3d2d5ec:3d6530fd79f1

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Sn reference · Chickpeas, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Sn reference · Chickpeas, as sold. Chickpeas, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference100–130 (bounded)100–130 (bounded)100–130 (bounded)
Alternative weighting100–130 (bounded)100–130 (bounded)100–130 (bounded)

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food1100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-cf282bdd8648:55c4c65e1972

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas U reference · Chickpeas, canned

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas U reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1≤1≤1
Alternative weighting≤1≤1≤1

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study1100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-42fef2fa24af:fb5e477df55b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Co reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Co reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference500700800
Alternative weighting500700800

5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20255100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-3f799f56babf:51e68b8d3191

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Cu reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Cu reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference650069008300
Alternative weighting650069008300

5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20255100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-72ec2bfea286:8147365af6d3

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Fe reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Fe reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference301003250038800
Alternative weighting301003250038800

5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20255100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-1d7e52594b2c:8a27c0d256d3

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Mn reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Mn reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference135001590019000
Alternative weighting135001590019000

5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20255100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-06882233d5cf:3cf2d2c50174

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI chickpeas Zn reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI chickpeas Zn reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference181003370038300
Alternative weighting181003370038300

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20254100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-5c284a5150fe:671d573a207b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

1 dataset

How metals reach chickpeas

No study in the library compared chickpeas from contaminated and ordinary settings, so the routes by which metals reach it are not measured here.

Which forms and regions measured lower

The HMI reference for lead in chickpeas, as sold pools 36 subgroup units from 1 sampling family, with a median of below 20 µg/kg and a middle half spanning below 10.3 (lower quartile) and between 1.2 and 50 µg/kg (upper quartile).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For lead in chickpeas, as sold, the reference median was below 7.5 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 5 to below 10 µg/kg across 6 units.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For lead in chickpeas, canned, the reference median was 3,700 µg/kg, with a middle half from 2,850 to 4,200 µg/kg across 4 units.5Alsabagh AAA · 2025Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, chickpeas, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.4 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (18 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EMRO (13 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (14 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

In one study, lead across 4 groups of chickpeas ranged from 2,200 µg/kg (Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad market) to 4,500 µg/kg (Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad market); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.5Alsabagh AAA · 2025Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →

Processing, cooking and preparation

No study in the library measured the same chickpeas before and after washing, peeling, drying or cooking for metals, so no processing effect can be stated. Heat does not destroy metals; cooking or drying changes a concentration by moving water or metal, not by removing the element.

Mitigation for chickpeas

No control for metals in chickpeas was measured in the library; lot testing against the applicable limit remains the verifiable step.

No study in this library has yet measured a way to lower heavy metals in chickpeas; the results above show the levels measured, and lot testing against the applicable limit remains the verifiable check.

Trade-offs and limits of controls

Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.

Testing chickpeas for metals

Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 200 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.5 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 40 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 3 µg/kg (FDA Total Diet Study) to 200 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →

A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.

Buying and verifying chickpeas

No maximum level for metals in chickpeas was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.

Exposure from chickpeas

No source in the library converted chickpeas concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.

Evidence review and remaining gaps

Every source record that names chickpeas was decided on its content: 11 occurrence extracted, 11 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.

References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.

Chickpeas FAQs

What heavy metals are found in chickpeas?

The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, tin, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, Se and Mo in chickpeas, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Al Zabadi H, Sayeh G, Jodeh S · 2018Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAgriculture & Food Security 7:50Read source →4Spungen JH, et al. · 2024Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in chickpeas, as sold from 406 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.4 to 18 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Which regions report the lowest levels in chickpeas?

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, chickpeas, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.4 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (18 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EMRO (13 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (14 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

How much of the arsenic in chickpeas is inorganic?

Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 2 results from 1 source, far fewer than total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported inorganic arsenic in chickpeas, as sold from 10 results in 2 reporting regions, with a subgroup median of 10.4 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

References

Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.

  1. GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsWorld Health Organization · GEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment Programme · 2026 · extranet.who.intDataset
  2. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsU.S. Food and Drug Administration · FDA Total Diet Study · 2022 · www.fda.govDataset
  3. Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAl Zabadi H, Sayeh G, and Jodeh S · Agriculture & Food Security 7:50 · 2018 · doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0205-1Peer-reviewed
  4. Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Spungen JH and et al. · Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A · 2024 · doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2024.2396910Peer-reviewed
  5. Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlsabagh AAA · Alnakhla Journal of Science · 2025 · doi.org/10.63799/AJOS/14.2.7Peer-reviewed
  6. healthy eating patterns should include a variety of vegetables from all five of the Access this article onlineUnknown authors · Peer-reviewed article · 2020 · doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v12i6.33792Peer-reviewed
  7. Characterization of Heavy Metals in Some Edible Dried Fruits and Nuts Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission SpectroscopyAkçay Kulluk D, Gökmen F, Dursun N, Özcan MM, and Lemiashonak V · Erwerbs-Obstbau (Springer); accepted 26 November 2022; volume and pages not printed in the filed PDF · 2023 · doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00815-2Peer-reviewed
  8. Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives · WHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA) · 2022 · www.who.intGovernment

Sources

Browse Chickpeas Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.

Update history

22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every chickpeas record in the library: 11 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.