Chickpeas in the HMI library has 148 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, tin, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, Se and Mo from 11 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAgriculture & Food Security 7:50Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →6healthy eating patterns should include a variety of vegetables from all five of the Access this article onlinePeer-reviewed articleRead source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury and nickel and others, in 148 results from 11 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAgriculture & Food Security 7:50Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →
-
Main drivers:
Form, basis and where the chickpeas was sampled; reporting limits decide how many results are non-detects.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAgriculture & Food Security 7:50Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAgriculture & Food Security 7:50Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →
Chickpeas overview
Chickpeas in the HMI library has 148 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, tin, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, Se and Mo from 11 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAgriculture & Food Security 7:50Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →6healthy eating patterns should include a variety of vegetables from all five of the Access this article onlinePeer-reviewed articleRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in chickpeas, as sold from 406 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.4 to 18 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, chickpeas, canned had a median lead result below 4 µg/kg across 1 composite from 2020.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
Akçay et al. 2023 reported lead at 379 µg/kg (mean ± 12.8 SD) in chickpeas, cooked from market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products).7Characterization of Heavy Metals in Some Edible Dried Fruits and Nuts Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission SpectroscopyErwerbs-Obstbau (Springer); accepted 26 November 2022; volume and pages not printed in the filed PDFRead source → Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported cadmium means and medians with the basis not stated ranged from 6.3 µg/kg (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022) to 92 µg/kg (Akçay et al. 2023).7Characterization of Heavy Metals in Some Edible Dried Fruits and Nuts Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission SpectroscopyErwerbs-Obstbau (Springer); accepted 26 November 2022; volume and pages not printed in the filed PDFRead source →8Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentWHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA)Read source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the chickpeas came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as chickpeas
This page covers chickpeas in 3 forms kept separate in every comparison: chickpeas, canned (65 results), chickpeas, as sold (55 results) and chickpeas, cooked (28 results).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAgriculture & Food Security 7:50Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →6healthy eating patterns should include a variety of vegetables from all five of the Access this article onlinePeer-reviewed articleRead source →
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of chickpeas
The table holds every extracted chickpeas result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 148 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAgriculture & Food Security 7:50Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →6healthy eating patterns should include a variety of vegetables from all five of the Access this article onlinePeer-reviewed articleRead source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
33 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 0 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 2 values from 1 source failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.5Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of chickpeas, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 33 findings from 8 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
148 of 148 findings · 16 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
12 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | all 4 cansCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 1 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 2 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 3 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 4 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
17 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2001–2003As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldauthors 2020 | all samples, traditional supermarkets, BenghaziCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2012–2015Dry weight | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2012Dry weight | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2015Dry weight | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C8), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C8), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
12 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | all 4 cansCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 1 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 2 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 3 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 4 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
19 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2016–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2006As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldauthors 2020 | all samples, traditional supermarkets, BenghaziCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | all samples (single foodstuff, duplicate mean)2022–2023Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
8 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011–2012As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2020–2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2020–2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldauthors 2020 | all samples, traditional supermarkets, BenghaziCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2012As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldauthors 2020 | all samples, traditional supermarkets, BenghaziCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C8), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C8), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005As sold / fresh | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
5 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
11 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | all 4 cansCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 1 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 2 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 3 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 4 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | chickpeas, Lebanese manufactureCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C8), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C8), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
5 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
5 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
10 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | all 4 cansCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 1 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 2 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 3 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAl et al. 2018 | chickpeas retail can 4 of 4 (origin Palestine)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.4% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 25.9% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chickpeas, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 29.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Chickpeas, cookedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, canned
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤4 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤4 |
2 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 1 | 50% |
| Spungen et al. 2024 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-586a565e9699:c692b8a4fffe
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2850 | 3700 | 4200 |
| Alternative weighting | 2850 | 3700 | 4200 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-f32e9038d7a4:18572b79363e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, as sold. Chickpeas, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10.3 | ≤20 | 1.2–50 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10.5 | ≤20 | ≤50 |
36 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 36 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-cce444249083:f430d40a419a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Pb reference · Chickpeas, as sold, dry weight. Chickpeas, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5 | ≤7.5 | ≤10 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3.8 | ≤5 | 2.3–10 (bounded) |
6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 6 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-0bc2c642dd4e:f8ba7be1ce5d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Cd reference · Chickpeas, canned
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Cd reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Alternative weighting | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-c2e3b3c754cb:880b8b6cfca7
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Cd reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Cd reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 200 | 200 | 400 |
| Alternative weighting | 200 | 200 | 400 |
5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 5 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-a9067ccb09f3:bc461673e8cf
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Cd reference · Chickpeas, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Cd reference · Chickpeas, as sold. Chickpeas, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5 | ≤10 | 4.6–12 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤4.6 | 0.25–10 (bounded) | 12–13 (bounded) |
35 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 35 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-6cd1ebe10327:4979f03659bc
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas tAs reference · Chickpeas, canned
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas tAs reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 4.9 | 4.9 | 4.9 |
| Alternative weighting | 4.9 | 4.9 | 4.9 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-4ef35b4d4e9f:8ae512332d9b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas tAs reference · Chickpeas, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas tAs reference · Chickpeas, as sold. Chickpeas, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤25.5 | ≤41.8 | 22–59.3 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤27 | ≤43.5 | 20–85 (bounded) |
24 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 24 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-655bf68d70ca:af3427936cf9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas iAs reference · Chickpeas, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas iAs reference · Chickpeas, as sold. Chickpeas, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10.4 | 5.21–15.2 (bounded) | 10.4–20 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10.4 | 5.21–15.2 (bounded) | 10.4–20 (bounded) |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-b51bf272b50f:0c525c8c6179
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas tHg reference · Chickpeas, canned
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas tHg reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-1f25d907c74d:8a48e8aaafbc
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas tHg reference · Chickpeas, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas tHg reference · Chickpeas, as sold. Chickpeas, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5 | ≤6.35 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤5 | ≤6.35 | ≤50 |
10 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 10 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-34ba4bbb552f:c673f81b63f2
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Ni reference · Chickpeas, canned
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Ni reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Alternative weighting | 180 | 180 | 180 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-8ceea32d286b:dde7115eb9c4
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Cr reference · Chickpeas, canned
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Cr reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-c5dbc3d2d5ec:3d6530fd79f1
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Sn reference · Chickpeas, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Sn reference · Chickpeas, as sold. Chickpeas, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 100–130 (bounded) | 100–130 (bounded) | 100–130 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 100–130 (bounded) | 100–130 (bounded) | 100–130 (bounded) |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, as sold on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-cf282bdd8648:55c4c65e1972
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas U reference · Chickpeas, canned
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas U reference · Chickpeas, canned. Chickpeas, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-42fef2fa24af:fb5e477df55b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Co reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Co reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 500 | 700 | 800 |
| Alternative weighting | 500 | 700 | 800 |
5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 5 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-3f799f56babf:51e68b8d3191
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Cu reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Cu reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 6500 | 6900 | 8300 |
| Alternative weighting | 6500 | 6900 | 8300 |
5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 5 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-72ec2bfea286:8147365af6d3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Fe reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Fe reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 30100 | 32500 | 38800 |
| Alternative weighting | 30100 | 32500 | 38800 |
5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 5 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-1d7e52594b2c:8a27c0d256d3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Mn reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Mn reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 13500 | 15900 | 19000 |
| Alternative weighting | 13500 | 15900 | 19000 |
5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 5 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-06882233d5cf:3cf2d2c50174
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chickpeas Zn reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chickpeas Zn reference · Chickpeas, canned, dry weight. Chickpeas, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 18100 | 33700 | 38300 |
| Alternative weighting | 18100 | 33700 | 38300 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chickpeas, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chickpeas, canned on this basis in the completed chickpeas ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chickpeas-5c284a5150fe:671d573a207b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The value could not be reconciled with its own paper, so it is shown but not compared.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
Reporting limits overlap the study comparison, so no direction can be shown.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach chickpeas
No study in the library compared chickpeas from contaminated and ordinary settings, so the routes by which metals reach it are not measured here.
Which forms and regions measured lower
The HMI reference for lead in chickpeas, as sold pools 36 subgroup units from 1 sampling family, with a median of below 20 µg/kg and a middle half spanning below 10.3 (lower quartile) and between 1.2 and 50 µg/kg (upper quartile).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For lead in chickpeas, as sold, the reference median was below 7.5 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 5 to below 10 µg/kg across 6 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For lead in chickpeas, canned, the reference median was 3,700 µg/kg, with a middle half from 2,850 to 4,200 µg/kg across 4 units.5Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, chickpeas, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.4 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (18 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EMRO (13 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (14 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
In one study, lead across 4 groups of chickpeas ranged from 2,200 µg/kg (Saudi Arabia origin, 18.6% dry solids, Baghdad market) to 4,500 µg/kg (Lebanon origin, 24.5% dry solids, Baghdad market); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.5Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
No study in the library measured the same chickpeas before and after washing, peeling, drying or cooking for metals, so no processing effect can be stated. Heat does not destroy metals; cooking or drying changes a concentration by moving water or metal, not by removing the element.
Mitigation for chickpeas
No control for metals in chickpeas was measured in the library; lot testing against the applicable limit remains the verifiable step.
No study in this library has yet measured a way to lower heavy metals in chickpeas; the results above show the levels measured, and lot testing against the applicable limit remains the verifiable check.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing chickpeas for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 200 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.5 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 40 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 3 µg/kg (FDA Total Diet Study) to 200 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying chickpeas
No maximum level for metals in chickpeas was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from chickpeas
No source in the library converted chickpeas concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names chickpeas was decided on its content: 11 occurrence extracted, 11 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Chickpeas FAQs
What heavy metals are found in chickpeas?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, tin, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, Se and Mo in chickpeas, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsAgriculture & Food Security 7:50Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in chickpeas, as sold from 406 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.4 to 18 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in chickpeas?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, chickpeas, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.4 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (18 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EMRO (13 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (14 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How much of the arsenic in chickpeas is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 2 results from 1 source, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported inorganic arsenic in chickpeas, as sold from 10 results in 2 reporting regions, with a subgroup median of 10.4 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsDataset
- Environmental exposure assessment of cadmium, lead, copper and zinc in different Palestinian canned foodsPeer-reviewed
- Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Peer-reviewed
- Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadPeer-reviewed
- healthy eating patterns should include a variety of vegetables from all five of the Access this article onlinePeer-reviewed
- Characterization of Heavy Metals in Some Edible Dried Fruits and Nuts Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission SpectroscopyPeer-reviewed
- Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentGovernment
Sources
Browse Chickpeas Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every chickpeas record in the library: 11 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.
