Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

lenge for mercury removal from contaminated waters and industrial effluents. In this

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by3 pages
Metals measured1
Evidence tierB
Year2025

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • and maintained 38.7% selectivity toward Hg(II) in multicomponent solutions. DFT-based
  • powerful means to describe the energetic heterogeneity of porous adsorbents (16).
  • fitting parameters are summarized in Table 1. The PFO model showed poor agreement
  • Table 1. Fitting results of kinetic models for Hg(II) adsorption on SG-3PS-Cys.
  • Notes: Uncertainties are ±95% Confidence Interval from nonlinear regressions using the Levenberg–Marquardt
  • Symbols represent the mean of triplicate measurements (±1 SD); continuous lines are visual guides.
  • two-sites, S-shape, and Toth, were tested to describe the adsorption data (Figure 5, Table 2).
  • Sips model best described the data at pH 3, while the S-shape model was more suitable
  • of fast equilibrium (≈120 min) and >70% regeneration efficiency highlights the chemical
  • regenerant. After four cycles, SG-3PS-Cys retained ~79% Hg(II) removal; in the fifth, effi-
  • ciency declined by ~28% relative to the first but remained > 70% overall. This performance
  • Table 2. Results of data adjustments to the models of Hg(II) ions adsorption isotherms on the
  • (Table 3). The aminopropyl-functionalized MCM-41 by Hamid et al. (35) reported the
  • Table 3. Comparative performance and mechanistic characteristics of representative Hg(II) adsorbents
  • SG-3PS-Cys Hg–N/Hg–O Yes (~72%
  • Table 4 summarizes the textural parameters of the SG-3PS-Cys and SG-3PS-Cys-Hg ad-
  • the carboxyl carbon of cysteine resonates at 175.5 ppm, whereas an additional resonance
  • appears at 170.5 ppm in SG-3PS-Cys-Hg, consistent with carboxylate groups involved
  • ppm, corresponding to the α-carbon adjacent to –NH2 , exhibits partial splitting in SG-
  • using AAnalyzer v2.25 to determine atomic concentrations (Table 5) (51); the C 1s region
  • spectra (Figure 12c,d,i) confirm that carbon and sulfur remain chemically stable. The C–S
  • Table 5. Atomic concentrations are calculated as organic compounds.
  • SG-3PS-Cys-Hg 88.8% 3.0% 6.1% 2.1%
  • following pseudo-second-order kinetics and retained over 70% removal efficiency after
  • Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 99%) was used as the main silica source, L-cysteine
  • (Cys, 98%) as the active ligand, and (3-chloropropyl) triethoxysilane (3CPTES, 97%) as
  • the coupling agent. Mercury (II) nitrate monohydrate (≥98%) was used for preparing Hg
  • solutions, and triethylamine (TEA, 99.5%) served as the gelling agent. All reagents were
  • ters are expressed as mean ± 95% Confidence Interval obtained by nonlinear regression
  • uptake at pH 3–5, representative of wastewater effluents (37). Initial concentrations ranged
  • calculated with Equation (1). Reported values correspond to the mean of three replicates.
  • preloaded to ~15% of its total capacity (0.343 mmol N g−1 by elemental analysis; θ ≈ 0.15)
  • removal % = ∗ 100 (2)
    1. Diario Oficial de la federación. NOM- 001-SEMARNAT 2021. Que establece los límites permisibles de contaminantes

Methods (brief)

  • adsorption of Hg(II) and other metals. In multi-cation tests, Hg was quantified by ICP-MS, while
  • co-ions were measured by AAS to meet detection limits and prevent Hg memory effects. (c) Cysteine
  • Sample SBET (m2 g−1 ) CBET
  • (T2 /T3 /Q2 /Q3 ≈ 10/35/5/50) remains unchanged in both samples, confirming that the
  • Figure 11. Wide-scan XPS spectra for sample (a) SG-3PS-Cys and (b) SG-3PS-Cys-Hg.
  • Sample O1s, C1s, Si2p N1s S2p Hg4f
  • sample SG-3PS-Cys (upper figures) and SG-3PS-Cys-Hg, respectively, including Hg4f overlapping
  • Si2p in SG-3PS-Cys-Hg sample (lower figures).
  • stants. After agitation in a thermostated bath, samples were filtered and analyzed for
  • total Hg by ICP- MS (Agilent 7500a). Error bars represent ±1 SD, and kinetic parame-
  • tration, mercury concentrations were measured by ICP-MS, and equilibrium uptake was
  • determined using an Analytik Jena ContrAA 300 AAS (for Cr, Fe, Cd, Pb, Cu) and ICP-MS
  • (50 ◦ C, 24 h), and reused. Mercury content was determined by ICP-MS, and the amounts
  • (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). Prior to analysis, 0.2 g of sample was degassed
  • ter equipped with an ATR iD5 module (Waltham, MA, USA). Prior to analysis, samples
  • were dried at 50 ◦ C for 24 h. Spectra were collected over 500–4000 cm−1 with 4 cm−1
  • resolution and 16 scans per sample.
  • Samples were dehydrated for 48 h at 333 K before analysis. Solid-state NMR was

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised