Overview
This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.
Key numbers
The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:
- one-way ANOVA analysis). In contrast, selective sequential extractions resulted in a homogeneous distribution, with >90% of each
- surface exchange of gaseous and particulate Hg.10,13−15 For all wide range of rates in aggregation, deposition, methylation, and
- credit system might implement a range of technologies and Hg2+, soluble 201Hg-humic acid complexes, nanoparticulate
- components of a watershed in the Experimental Lakes region with locally sourced soil comprising 64, 28, and 13% sand, silt,
- that have been observed in historically impacted and managed 30% v/v HNO3 (F4), and aqua regia (F5). F1 represents
- watersheds.3 This dosing level was also selected to exceed the water-soluble Hg, F2 is meant to mimic human stomach fluid
- dosing (17 ± 2 ng g−1, N = 9). In other wetland mesocosm species, F4 dissolves some solid-phase Hg species or elemental
- of the experiment (sediment total Hg = 14 ± 4 ng g−1, N = 9). Approximately 0.7 g of wet-weight-homogenized sediment
- samples (N = 4−6 per mesocosm box) were collected by hand resuspended and washed with 40 mL of the same extractant,
- (10%) of BrCl was used for F3 to ensure acidification. The
- After the collection of water, sediment samples (N = 3 per determine the wet−dry ratio for normalization of Hg
- water column (N = 6) and placed face down in the surface and DGTs were analyzed by stannous chloride reduction,
- sediment of the submerged aquatic zone (N = 6) for 7 days. amalgamation (BrooksRand T-MERX) connected in line with
- 80, and 360 days after dosing (N = 4 per mesocosm). Fish the extraction of MeHg with acidified potassium bromide and
- dichloromethane.47 For MeHg quantitation in fish, samples ANOVA assessed the differences in these % contributions for
- (>70% for all samples) was used to correct the MeHg the variance of % contribution within each endmember group.
- were within 80−120% of the reported average reference values. distribution was defined as p < 0.05. Additionally, for water
- mesocosms. The values correspond to the average flux for N = 5 or 6 DGTs deployed in each mesocosm box at three different sampling events: (A)
- 17 days; (B) 38 days; and (C) 360 days after the Hg endmember dosing. Error bars represent one standard error around the mean.
- 42 days, and (C,F) 360 days after the Hg isotope dosing to the mesocosm boxes. The values correspond to the average concentration for N = 3 at
- Day 3 after dosing, 9.1−18.5% of THg from the Hg spikes was uptake flux to the samplers differed by endmember (Figure 2).
- larger (36.8−53.7%). For all sample time points for filtered initially dissolved forms yielded the largest uptake fluxes (from
- mesocosms. The values correspond to the average flux for N = 5 or 6 DGTs deployed in each mesocosm box at three different sampling events: (A)
- 7 days; (B) 42 days; and (C) 360 days after the Hg isotope dosing. Error bars represent one standard error around the mean.
- 12 to 20 ng day−1 cm−2), while the respective DGT flux values THg corresponded to 46−550 and 8−28%, respectively, of the
- mesocosms (0−2 cm depth), wide ranges of THg concen- surface sediment were highly dependent on the initial Hg
- then the measured THg contents at 7 days after dosing experimental duration, with % MeHg values ranging from 0.07
- represented 12−257% of the Hg added at the start of the to 2.73% at Day 7, 0.13 to 2.31% at Day 42, and 0.39 to 2.75%
- deployed in the sediments were typically between 50 and 300 the extracted THg (>90%) was measured in the F3 extraction
- result would be expected if most of the added Hg accumulated (between 60 and 110% of the separately measured THg
- represent 0.01−0.1% of the added Hg for each endmember. months. At one year after dosing, the DGT uptake fluxes of the
- observed to decrease by 80, 35, and 66% in the lake water
- mercury stable isotopes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2011, 75 (3), (22) Shabman, L.; Stephenson, K. Achieving nutrient water quality
- (13) Gerson, J. R.; Szponar, N.; Zambrano, A. A.; Bergquist, B.; mercury in a boreal forest wetland: A stable mercury isotope
- (46) Hintelmann, H.; Evans, R. Application of stable isotopes in holbrooki) from three experimental populations. Environ. Toxicol.
- (49) VanderPlas, J.; Granger, B.; Heer, J.; Moritz, D.; S. Chronic Engineered Nanoparticle Additions Alter Insect
Methods (brief)
- of aqueous Hg in a diffusive gradient in thin-film (DGT) passive samplers. We observed that the four isotope spikes were relatively
- after spike addition. However, the uptake fluxes of Hg in DGT samplers, deployed in both the water column and surface sediment,
- within weeks after addition, these input pools remain differentiated for more than one year in terms of reactivity for passive samplers,
- KEYWORDS: mercury, freshwater wetland, partitioning, passive samplers, bioaccumulation, fate and transport
- phosphorus, and sediment.21−23 If this approach were applied gradient in thin-film (DGT) passive samplers for predicting the
- (e.g., aqueous-solid phase partitioning, oxidation/reduction surface sediments and by deploying DGT samplers in surface
- amount that targeted 100 ng Hg g−1 soil per endmember. This procedure, sediment samples were sequentially exposed to five
- Wetland Sample Collection and Processing. Surface was mixed with 40 mL of the extraction fluid. After mixing
- water and sediment samples were collected from each wetland end-overend for an overnight period, the suspension was
- samples (N = 4−6 per mesocosm box) were collected by hand resuspended and washed with 40 mL of the same extractant,
- samples were filtered with a poly(ether)sulfone filter (0.2 μm
- aqua regia step (F5) entailed overnight digestion of the sample
- and filtered water samples were amended with BrCl (1% v/v)
- concentrated HNO3. After digestion, the mixture was diluted
- After the collection of water, sediment samples (N = 3 per determine the wet−dry ratio for normalization of Hg
- (Environmental Express Clean Cup digestion vessel; diameter Chemical Analyses. In situ dissolved oxygen, pH, and
- laboratory, aliquots of the sediments corresponding to the top the collection of water, sediment, and fish samples. For a
- 2 cm layer were extruded from the core, homogenized, and subset of filtered water samples corresponding to -1, 10, and
Implications
This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.
Wiki pages this source may touch
- Fish — marine, predatory (tuna, swordfish, shark, king mackerel)
- Fish — marine, non-predatory (sardines, anchovies, salmon, cod)
- Mercury
- Mercury
Verification notes
- Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing
wiki/sources/pages before creation. - Full-PDF read:
pdftotext -layoutwas run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written. - Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
- Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
- HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.
Update history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.