Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Determination of Mercury, Methylmercury and Selenium

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by7 pages
Metals measured3
Evidence tierB
Year2022

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • determined by HrGc/Ms. THg and MeHg concentrations ranged from 0.61 to 1.25 µg g−1 w.w. and
  • Citation: Storelli, A.; Barone, G.; approximately 50% of the concentration measured to avoid exceeding the PTWI. Nevertheless, the
  • proportion of MeHg respective to the total amount of Hg, from about 10% in phytoplankton
  • glauca (blue shark, n = 20), Squalus acanthias (picked dogfish, n = 38), Squalus blainville
  • (longnose spurdog, n = 26), Mustelus mustelus (smooth-hound, n = 32), Mustelus asterias
  • (starry smooth-hound, n = 30 ), Scyliorhinus canicula (lesser spotted dogfish, n = 49), Lamna
  • nasus (porbeagle, n = 20), Raja clavata (thornback ray, n = 41), Raja miraletus (brown ray,
  • n = 45), Raja asterias (Mediterranean starry ray, n = 50), Leucoraja circularis (sandy ray, n = 48),
  • NaCl 10% (w/v) was added to the sample, and the mixture was centrifuged (2400 rpm
  • extract was subjected twice to back-extraction with a 1% (v/w) cysteine aqueous solution.
  • reaction was carried out by adding 1 mL of saturated CuSO4 solution and 0.2 mL of 1% (v/w)
  • designed at 240 ◦ C. Helium (99.99%) was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1 .
  • atopancreas (National Research Council of Canada). Replicate analyses (n = 3) (THg
  • blank value) and of quantification (LOQs: 10 SD blank value) were the following: LODs:
  • THg: 5 ng g−1 wet weight, MeHg: 0.03 ng g−1 wet weight, Se: 1 ng g−1 wet weight; LOQs:
  • As shown in Table 1, overall findings showed concentrations of THg and MeHg
  • for the MeHg/THg ratio, the percentages varied from 77.6% to 98.4% with an average of
  • 88.5%. These results are in good agreement with the general assumption that most of the
  • Table 1. Total mercury (THg), methylmercury (MeHg), selenium (Se) concentrations expressed in
  • µg g−1 wet weight (means ± SD), percentages of methylmercury respect to THg and number of
  • scribe Se concentrations equal to 0.30 µg g−1 w.w. and in the range of 0.084–0.46 µg g−1
  • children (31,32). While THg intake is acceptable for the general population, it should not
  • weekly consumption of fish for a total population of 271.6 g week−1 , ranged from 1.91 to
  • In terms of species (Table 2), THg estimated intake was higher than the corresponding
  • reaching also 84% of established PTWI.
  • Table 2. Estimated weekly intakes (EWI: µg kg− 1 bw week− 1 ) of total mercury (THg) and methylmer-
  • 50% than those measured to avoid exceeding the PTWI. However, emphasis needs to be
  • servings per week was considered. As seen in Table 2, the consumption of the studied
  • effects, but not more than one meal in a month of sharks and torpedinids (Table S2).
  • of the Hg, Se and selenium health benefit value (HBVSe). Table S2 MeHg concentrations, daily
    1. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Risk Based Concentration Table; United States Environmental Protection
    1. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Regional Screening Level (RSL) Summary Table (TR = 1E-06, HQ = 1);

Methods (brief)

  • for each species. THg and Se were analysed by atomic absorption spectrometry, while MeHg was
  • samples European Community limits for THg were surpassed, while for MeHg none of the fish had
  • in Southern Italy. Fish samples, separated by species, were placed in polythene bags, and
  • (n = 20) of about 100 g of muscle tissue were taken. For each species, a composite sample
  • aliquots of samples (about 2 g) were digested to a transparent solution with a mixture
  • of H2 SO4 –HNO3 (1:1). The sample solution was then cooled and diluted with double
  • Concentrations of THg and Se were quantified by atomic absorption spectrophotometer
  • For the quantification of MeHg, aliquots of the samples (about 0.5 g) were washed with
  • and the sample was added to ethylmercury chloride in methanol (100 µL internal standard)
  • NaCl 10% (w/v) was added to the sample, and the mixture was centrifuged (2400 rpm
  • After acidification of the collected cysteine extract with H2 SO4 (0.1 M), the derivatization
  • µL of the sample was injected in splitless mode at an injection temperature of 250 ◦ C. The
  • calibration standards, spiked samples and the certified material TORT-3 Lobster Hep-
  • 10.9 ± 1.0 mg kg−1 dry weight), (% recovery = 96–101%). The limits of detection (LOD: 3 SD
  • blank value) and of quantification (LOQs: 10 SD blank value) were the following: LODs:
  • THg: 5 ng g−1 wet weight, MeHg: 0.03 ng g−1 wet weight, Se: 1 ng g−1 wet weight; LOQs:
  • standard is currently available, consequently the results obtained for muscle samples are
  • most of the studied fish samples contained concentrations exceeding the nationally or

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised