Overview
This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the methylmercury infant-formula research pull. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.
Key numbers
The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:
- Journal of Dry Zone Agriculture, 2020, 6 (2): 117 - 128
- ISSN 2012 − 8673
- scenario). Based on farm survey data collected during 2010 and 2012 cropping
- Introduction production and around 61% of the rural
- on agriculture, which contributes for 21% employed in agricultural sector (GOP
- of the GDP and employs 44% of the 2018). Irrigated agricultural water use is
- supplies more than 90% of agricultural of the total withdrawal of water . Water is
- Corresponding Author: R.J.Culas, rculas@csu.edu.au 117
- system. The distribution of irrigation rainfall (10 - 20%), cannel (surface)
- water poses inequality at different levels water (40%) and groundwater (40-50%).
- land degradation (Qureshi et al., 2010). benefits involved. In Pakistan farmers
- collect data from 256 farm households to various socioeconomic and technological
- included 60:40, 50:50, and 30:70 Chenab Canal (LCC) irrigation system
- percentages of the canal and groundwater (Figure 1).
- (distributary) of the canal system (30:70) was conducted during 2010-11 and 2012-
- while more canal water should be used at 13 cropping sessions, respectively, as
- system (70:30). The economic modelling et al., 2015). Three distributaries of the
- at the ICDA 2019 conference (Culas, selected for the head, middle and tail
-
- as well as reported in Culas and reaches, respectively.
- Baig, 2020. Table 1 presents the optimal water use
- analysed for the farmers’ adaptation in Culas and Baig 2020, The optimal
- Figure 1: Location of the selected distributaries in the LCC East irrigation system
- of the canal and groundwater use at the (30:70) and more canal water should be
- Table 1: Optimal water use scenarios (base scenarios are given in brackets) (%)
- Canal (surface) water 30 (60) 40 (50) 70 (30)
- Total water use 100 (100) 100 (100) 100 (100)
- Source: Culas and Baig (2020)
- and Baig 2020, a discrete choice the i individual will adopt the
- can take two values (1 = Yes, 0 = No). 1. The left-hand side of equation 2
- increases in value from - to + as P1/i
- The purpose of this model is to estimate increases from 0 to 1.
- function defined as: Terai; Khair et al. (2012) analysed
- P1/i = probability a certain Empirical Model and the Results
- taking the value of ‘1’ and ‘0’ (as
- groundwater help address the problem of al., 2019). Respondents were given
- was put in front of the respondents and were given the value ‘1’ while rests of the
- they were asked to show their willingness respondents were given value ‘0’.
- value of ‘1’ if the above option (in relation (media) used by respondents. If respondent
- acceptable to him while he was given a value ‘1’ indicating access to the media
- value of ‘0’ if the base scenario (current while respondents scoring less than three
- pattern of) water usewas acceptableto him. were assigned a value ‘0’ indicating no
- with respect to head, middle or tail region (Birthal et al., 2015; Aryal et al., 2018;
Methods (brief)
- scenario). Based on farm survey data collected during 2010 and 2012 cropping
Implications
This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.
Wiki pages this source may touch
Verification notes
- Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing
wiki/sources/pages before creation. - Full-PDF read:
pdftotext -layoutwas run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written. - Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
- Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
- HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.
Update history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.