Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Risk Assessment for Children Exposed to Arsenic

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by9 pages
Metals measured6
Evidence tierB
Year2017

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • and some vegetables has diminished greatly since the 1970s. The desiccant properties of arsenic are
  • deaths in association with drinking water arsenic concentrations ranging from 50 to 900 µg/L (14).
  • level today is 0.7 mg/kg (25). This screening level is based on the carcinogenic risk level of 1 × 10−6
  • 2.1 mg/kg for residential areas and 12 mg/kg for commercial/industrial areas (26).
  • Globally, background concentrations of arsenic in soils are around 5 mg/kg with ranges from
  • 1 to 40 mg/kg (27). In Florida, the average concentration measured in surface soils was 1.3 mg/kg (28).
  • A study by Chirenje et al. (29) found that levels were lower in non-urban soils (0.27 mg/kg) relative
  • observed for benzo(a)pyrene which was below the practical quantification limit (PQL) of 0.037 mg/kg
  • and for 4,4-DDE which was below the PQL of 0.0037 mg/kg. For more details about the specific
  • risk based level for arsenic in Florida is 2.1 mg/kg, and samples collected during the initial screening
  • ballfields were at intermediary values; and outfield samples were the highest (Table 2) (p < 0.001).
  • Table 1. Arsenic concentrations with depth at Chapman and Colonial Fields. These results include all
  • was 29.6 mg/kg. These results are biased low because they were collected early during the sampling study during
  • Table 2. Arsenic concentrations by location at Chapman and Colonial Fields. These results include all
  • concentration values, Cs in Equations (1)–(3), were used to compute risk (Table 3). All of the concentrations
  • soil depth samples. The first set of concentration values corresponded to the 95% upper confidence
  • data skewness, and data distribution when computing the upper 95% UCL of the mean. The remaining
  • for Chapman field and, (d) the 95% UCL based upon levels measured in outfield areas. For this
  • at alternate exposures we found that 95% upper confidence limits (UCL) considered distributional
  • skewness and in some cases outliers. As a result the 95% UCL may be a more representative of
  • The maximum values for each field (262 mg/kg for Chapman and 120 mg/kg for Colonial) were
  • Table 3. Arsenic soil concentrations (Cs ) across fields/areas computed for surface soil samples (depth
  • 95% upper confidence limit, Across all concentrations
  • For Equations (1)–(3), the values used can be found in Table 4. Pica ingestion rates were applied
  • is consistent with the 2010 U.S. EPA study (44) which found RBA values from 10% to 60%. Skin surface
  • for adolescents less than 21 years of age. A factor of 50% was applied to the surface area values
  • found ((40), Table 7-4, the fourth table in Chapter 7). The skin absorption factor for arsenic was set to
  • moderate intensity levels ((46), Table 7-21). Averages across age groups were matched to the 2 to 6 and
  • according to adult male light activity breathing rates ((40), Table 6-26). Players were assigned values
  • from for male’s short term high activity inhalation rates according to age group ((46), Table 7-21).
  • kept at its original value based on vegetative cover of 50%. However, for the scenarios that considered
  • on 5% vegetative cover for the infield and 85% vegetative cover for the outfield. The PEF value as
  • Table 5. Parameters used in the calculation of PEF.
  • Inverse of a Mean Concentration at Center of a 0.5-Acre Square Source
  • provides a conservative estimate (95% confidence limit) for increased cancer risk. Risk was computed
  • extremely low increased risk (10−6 ) to very high increased risk (10−1 ) (Table 6) (36).
  • Table 6. Interpretation of computed risk values.
  • Route-specific and aggregate daily dose (Table 7) across age groups for the two baseball fields
  • magnitude. Because of the higher concentration found at Chapman (63.4 mg/kg) relative to Colonial
  • were similar to those shown in Table 7 above. The LADDs computed for individual categories
  • than the inhalation dose across age groups (e.g., ingestion dose was close to 98% of aggregate dose for
  • for each age group can be also found in Table 8, and considered the scenario where an individual

Methods (brief)

  • DMA-dimethylarsinic acid). Arsenic is found naturally in the environment, in soils and rocks which
  • samples at the specific fields. All analyses were conducted by certified laboratories employing routine
  • risk based level for arsenic in Florida is 2.1 mg/kg, and samples collected during the initial screening
  • to define concentration distributions. Samples were collected in and around the baseball fields at
  • both parks and at different soil depths. The depth of surface samples typically corresponded to 0–5
  • or 0–15 cm. Sets of samples at both fields were also collected at depths from 0 to 5 cm and from
  • comparisons that are made. Results from the soil samples showed that concentrations in the surface
  • sample locations, samples were collected at Chapman Field from the baseball infield, baseball outfield,
  • and in areas adjacent to but outside of the ballfields. At Colonial Field samples were also collected
  • from areas adjacent to the ballfields. However, within the ballfields, samples at Colonial Field were
  • collected only from the outfield. Results show that infield samples were lowest; areas adjacent to the
  • ballfields were at intermediary values; and outfield samples were the highest (Table 2) (p < 0.001).
  • samples collected regardless of location (infield, outfield, outside ballfields).
    • An additional 13 surface samples were collected for the 0–15 cm depth for Chapman. The average of these samples
  • was 29.6 mg/kg. These results are biased low because they were collected early during the sampling study during
  • surface samples collected regardless of depth (surficial, 0–5 cm, 0–15 cm).
  • soil depth samples. The first set of concentration values corresponded to the 95% upper confidence
  • four values correspond to: (a) the maximum concentration regardless of soil sample depth, (b) the

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised