Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Concentration of mercury in muscles

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by8 pages
Metals measured4
Evidence tierB
Year2016

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • examined fish was as follows: pike (0.197 mg/kg) ≈ perch (0.173 mg/kg) > vendace (0.114 mg/kg) ≈ roach (0.095 mg/kg) and roach
  • ≈ whitefish (0.065 mg/kg), and whitefish ≈ bream (0.042 mg/kg) (p ≤ 0.05). In all cases, the content of mercury correlated positively
  • Table 1 shows the content of total mercury in the
  • (Coregonus albula L.), perch (Perca fluviatilis L.), and (0.197 and 0.173 mg/kg respectively) than other fish:
  • (±0.1 cm) of each fish were measured (Table 1). The perch (p > 0.05). Similar differences between the
  • (±0.0001 g) were weighed in a quartz boat and analysed of the fish (Table 2). The correlation between the body
  • percentage recovery rate was 100.2% (n = 4). length at r = 0.717, p = 0.109 (roach) and r = 0.734,
  • content of mercury and condition factor, body weight Table 3 presents equation parameters of the total
  • Table 1. Total weight, length of fish, and mean concentration of mercury (mg/kg wet weight) in muscles of freshwater fish
  • mean 0.042 d 0.095 bc 0.114 b 0.065 cd 0.173 a 0.197 a
  • Table 2. Regression equations and linear correlation coefficients (r) between content of mercury (mean y) (mg/kg wet weight) in muscles of fish
  • Table 3. Equation parameters of the total length (L) - body weight (W) relationship
  • content of mercury than non-predatory fish (Table 1). from the Lake Velenjsko (Slovenia) did not depend on
  • contained lower amount of mercury (0.08 mg/kg) (1). content in the muscles of perch. Farkas et al. (6) found
  • (Table 1). Andreji et al. (2) observed the highest with the advance in food chain of the aquatic
  • Carassius gibelio L.). According to these authors, there 629/2008 of 2 July 2008, which is 1.0 mg/kg for pike
  • were significant differences in total mercury content and 0.5 mg/kg, for the rest of the fish examined.
  • in the muscles of roach (0.78 mg/kg) established by objections can be raised concerning the examined fish

Methods (brief)

  • atomic absorption spectrometry using Milestone DMA-80 (with dual-cell). Results: The content of the element in the muscles of the
  • located in the Olsztyn Lake District (Poland). Sample 0.114 mg/kg, and whitefish - 0.065 mg/kg. There were
  • -30°C prior to analysis. Each sample was prepared from significant (p > 0.05).
  • Duplicate muscle samples of up to 270 mg positively correlated with body weight and total length
  • Mercury Analyzer), included with the software (DMA content was the highest (r = 0.979 and 0.977, p = 0.0000
  • concentration was processed with atomic absorption that there was a strong significant positive relationship
  • DMA-80 (with dual-cell). Parameters of ramp for drying perch and body weight (r = 0.962) and total length
  • Direct Mercury Analyzer Milestone’s DMA-80 was

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised