Overview
This page is a scaffolded entry for HMTc Taxonomy v2.0 Category 12 (Household Cleaning and Dishwashing), Row 20: Other household specialty cleaners (by functional use-case). Studies for this row are still being read. Where a section is empty, the row has not yet accumulated contributing sources of the required kind.
Literature scope
The Heavy Metal Index source corpus is currently focused on food and food-contact materials. This page documents an HMTc Taxonomy v2.0 row in the category Household Cleaning and Dishwashing for which no peer-reviewed primary or government sources have yet been ingested. The page exists as the routing destination for future ingest. Until sources land, the literature-evidence sections below are deliberately empty rather than guessed; HMTc certification thresholds for products in this row continue to be developed under the certification program at heavymetalcertified.com, not on this public page.
Reading guide
Legal, regulatory and retailer teams can use the cited measurements, applicable limits and study limitations to assess the evidence for this category.
Quality teams can examine product form, measurement basis and sources of variation. Journalists and researchers can follow each reference to the original findings and methods.
Related tools and pages: heavymetalcertified.com · methodology
Evidence summary
Sources for this row will be listed here once they are catalogued.
Source Evidence Inventory
Sources for this row will be listed here once they are catalogued.
Supporting evidence and scope
Broader-scope sources for this row will be listed here when they are catalogued.
Federal/Regulatory Limits vs Field Findings
Regulatory limits for this row will be listed here once they are catalogued.
Controls and mitigation
Practical interventions to reduce heavy-metal load in this row, ordered by impact magnitude. Each lever names the magnitude of the effect with a cited source; cross-links to dedicated Mitigation pages where they exist.
- Sourcing levers — Not yet catalogued.
- Agronomic levers — Not yet catalogued. (See Agronomic mitigation for general agronomic mitigation context.)
- Processing levers — Not yet catalogued. (See Processing mitigation.)
- Formulation levers — Not yet catalogued. (See Formulation mitigation.)
- Testing and QC levers — Not yet catalogued. (See Testing and quality-control mitigation when published.)
- Packaging and storage levers — Not yet catalogued. (See Packaging and storage mitigation when published.)
How standards math uses this page
HMT&C certification thresholds for this row are developed under the certification program at heavymetalcertified.com, not on this page. The row-standard for this row is an aggregate computed from the contributing source pool in the row’s native finished-product basis; it is not a per-source decoration of any single value cited on this page. This public page reports literature evidence only.
Historical recalls and enforcement
Public regulatory events for this row, such as recalls and import alerts, will be listed here as they are catalogued.
Methodology
This page reports what the cited sources say about heavy-metal concentrations in other household specialty cleaners (by functional use-case). Speciation is non-substitutable (iAs vs tAs, MeHg vs tHg, Cr-VI vs total Cr). Basis is preserved (finished-product as sold unless the source specifies otherwise; see each row for the basis label). Non-detect handling follows each source’s reporting convention. Pooling is avoided across LOD/LOQ, period, geography, and analytical-basis differences. HMT&C certification thresholds for products in this row are developed under the certification program at heavymetalcertified.com, not on this page; this public page reports literature evidence only.
The applicable regulatory jurisdictions for this row are: EPA (Safer Choice), Green Seal, state disclosure laws.
Sources
Sources for this row will be listed here once they are catalogued.
Sources
Source records associated with this topic. Inclusion does not establish that every finding applies to this product or ingredient. References above identify works cited in the text.
| # | Citation | Year | Type | Used on this page for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EPA 2024. EPA’s Safer Choice Program — Master Criteria for Safer Ingredients (Version 2.1, October 2024), U.S. EPA Safer Choice Program, Office of Pollution Prevention & Toxics (federal program criteria document; Version 2.1, October 2024; cover identifies the Safer Choice and Design for the Environment (DfE) certification programs) | 2024 | Government guidance | The EPA Safer Choice program’s Master Criteria document, Version 2.1 (October 2024), is the 31-page federal program criteria text that… |
| 2 | EPA 2024. EPA’s Safer Choice and Design for the Environment (DfE) Standard (August 2024), U.S. EPA Safer Choice Program, Office of Pollution Prevention & Toxics (federal program standard document; first issued June 2009 as the DfE Standard for Safer Products; revised April 2011, September 2012, February 2015 as EPA’s Safer Choice Standard; current August 2024 revision) | 2024 | Government guidance | US Cd, Pb, Hg, Cr-VI occurrence in Not applicable: federal program standard document. The 36-page Standard body (plus four annexes A-D giving sample partnership-agreement templates)… |
| 3 | New York State Department 2020. Cleansing Product Information Disclosure Program — Recommended Best Management Practices, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NY DEC) — undated post-court-ruling Recommended Best Management Practices (BMP) document supporting the statutory household-cleansing-product disclosure requirement at 6 NYCRR Part 659.6 (authorised by Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) Article 35). The predecessor Program Policy on Household Cleansing Product Information Disclosure was declared null and void by the NYS Supreme Court (Household & Commercial Products Association v. Seggos, ruling issued August 2020); DEC maintains the present BMP document as recommended practice while moving forward to implement the underlying statute and regulation. Document text references EPA’s pre-MCL drinking-water values for 1,4-dioxane (350 ppt) and PFOA/PFOS (70 ppt combined), consistent with pre-July-2020 publication of the BMP framework prior to NY DOH’s August 2020 adoption of stricter state MCLs for those chemicals. | 2020 | Government guidance | US-NY Pb, Cd, tAs, tHg, Cr-VI, Ni occurrence in Not applicable: post-2020 court-ruling Recommended Best Management Practices (BMP) guidance document. The 22-page document (sections A. Form of… |
| 4 | Partners et al. 2017. SB 258 (Lara): The Cleaning Product Right to Know Act of 2017 — factsheet, Coalition advocacy factsheet (two-page NGO joint-statement document) in support of California SB 258 (Sen. Ricardo Lara), the Cleaning Product Right to Know Act of 2017. Headers carry the logos of Breast Cancer Prevention Partners (BCPP), Environmental Working Group (EWG), Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and Women’s Voices for the Earth (WVE), in that order. Contact block on p. 2 names Nancy Buermeyer (BCPP), Bill Allayaud (EWG), Avi Kar (NRDC), and Jamie McConnell (WVE). | 2017 | NGO report | This is a two-page coalition advocacy factsheet circulated by Breast Cancer Prevention Partners (BCPP), the Environmental Working Group (EWG), the… |
| 5 | Earth et al. 2017. California Cleaning Product Right to Know Act — coalition co-sponsor post-passage summary letter (SB 258, 2017), One-page coalition post-passage summary letter circulated by Women’s Voices for the Earth (WVE) and Breast Cancer Prevention Partners (BCPP) following Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr.’s 15 October 2017 signature of California SB 258 (the Cleaning Product Right to Know Act). The letter is signed by Jamie (WVE) and Nancy & Janet (BCPP). It identifies WVE, BCPP, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and Environmental Working Group (EWG) as the four co-sponsors of the bill and names broader coalition and corporate supporters. | 2017 | NGO report | This is a one-page post-passage summary letter circulated by Women’s Voices for the Earth (WVE) and Breast Cancer Prevention Partners… |
| 6 | Foundation 2014. The dirt on toxic chemicals in household cleaning products, David Suzuki Foundation (consumer-education article, web copy archived as PDF) | 2014 | NGO report | CA As, Cd, Pb occurrence in Not applicable: consumer-education article; no original sampling, no analytical measurements. Compiled from cited secondary sources (ATSDR ToxFAQs sheets,… |
| 7 | Tjandraatmadja et al. 2010. Sources of contaminants in domestic wastewater: nutrients and additional elements from household products, CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship Report (Smart Water Fund Round 3 — Project 5), February 2010 (ISSN 1835-095X) | 2010 | Industry | AU Sb, Cr, Co, Mo, Se occurrence in One hundred and fifty-six household and personal-care products purchased from major supermarkets in Melbourne, Australia between February and… (n=156) |
| 8 | European Chemical Industry Ecology 1992. Nickel, Cobalt and Chromium in Consumer Products: Allergic Contact Dermatitis, ECETOC Technical Report No. 45, Brussels, March 1992 (ISSN 0773-8072-45) | 1992 | Industry | EU/US/IL Ni, Co, Cr, Cr-VI occurrence in Literature-review compilation of nickel, cobalt and chromium concentrations measured in consumer products by 28 published studies (1956-1990) and… |
Update history
No substantive edit history is available in this build. The full commit record is available in git.