Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Germany BVL 2017 - technically avoidable cosmetic metals

Regulation

Scope BVL’s 2017 announcement/report gives orientation values for technically avoidable heavy-metal contents in cosmetic products.

Page snapshot
Referenced by3 pages
JurisdictionDE
Effective2017-01-01

Scope

BVL’s 2017 announcement/report gives orientation values for technically avoidable heavy-metal contents in cosmetic products. The values apply to cosmetic products in general, toothpaste, and named decorative or theater/fan/carnival make-up exceptions.

Exact limit and units

SpeciesMatrixLimitBasis
Pbcosmetic products in general except listed higher-lead make-up categories2.0 mg/kgcosmetic product
Pbmake-up powder, rouge, eye shadow, eyeliner, kajal, and theater, fan, or carnival make-up5 mg/kgcosmetic product
Pbtoothpaste0.5 mg/kgcosmetic product
Cdcosmetic products in general0.1 mg/kgcosmetic product
Cdtoothpaste0.1 mg/kgcosmetic product
tHgcosmetic products in general0.1 mg/kgcosmetic product
tHgtoothpaste0.1 mg/kgcosmetic product
tAscosmetic products in general except theater, fan, or carnival make-up0.5 mg/kgcosmetic product
tAstheater, fan, or carnival make-up2.5 mg/kgcosmetic product
tAstoothpaste0.5 mg/kgcosmetic product
Sbcosmetic products in general0.5 mg/kgcosmetic product
Sbtoothpaste0.5 mg/kgcosmetic product

How tested

The report says the German Monitoring Scheme used a standardized convention method that brings the elements into solution under defined conditions. It cites BVL method K 84.00-29:2011-03 for pressure digestion to determine elements in cosmetic products.

Enforcement posture

The table gives technically avoidable orientation values. It explains that values above the listed levels are considered technically avoidable under good manufacturing practice, while product safety must still be demonstrated case by case under the EU cosmetic safety framework.

History of changes

The report replaces older German Federal Health Office orientation values from 1985 and 1990, which BVL considered outdated because lower heavy-metal levels had become achievable in cosmetic products.

How it compares

These German values are generally lower than the ASEAN-style 20 ppm lead and 5 ppm arsenic/cadmium cosmetic guidance limits, especially for toothpaste and most non-decorative cosmetics. The source treats arsenic and mercury as element-level contaminants without speciation detail.

Sources

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
a8052bb2026-08-09major1 source added; contamination-profile values revised; 7 sections added