Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

US FDA cosmetics heavy-metal policy — draft lead guidance (10 ppm) and the binding mercury trace rule (21 CFR 700.13, <1 ppm)

Regulation

The United States has no binding finished-product lead limit for cosmetics.

Page snapshot
Referenced by7 pages
JurisdictionUS
MetalPb; tHg

Overview

The United States has no binding finished-product lead limit for cosmetics. FDA’s only numeric finished-cosmetic lead value is a draft guidance (December 2016) recommending a maximum of 10 ppm lead as an impurity — it is not for implementation and binds no one. For mercury, a binding regulation exists: 21 CFR 700.13 treats any cosmetic containing mercury as adulterated unless the mercury is an unavoidable GMP trace below 1 ppm (or, for eye-area preservatives only, at or below 65 ppm). Both values are transcribed below with their different legal statuses kept explicit.

Scope

  • Lead draft guidance applies to cosmetic lip products (such as lipsticks, lip glosses, and lip liners) and externally applied cosmetics (such as eye shadows, blushes, shampoos, and body lotions) marketed in the United States. It does not cover products regulated as drugs in the US (fluoride anticaries toothpaste, sunscreens, zinc-oxide skin-protectant diaper creams).
  • 21 CFR 700.13 applies to all cosmetics, including products also regarded as drugs in the case of skin-bleaching preparations.

Exact limit and units

ProvisionInstrument text valueSI equivalents (conversion shown)Legal status
Lead as an impurity in cosmetic lip products and externally applied cosmetics10 parts per million10 ppm = 10 mg/kg = 10,000 µg/kgDraft guidance, December 2016 — not for implementation, non-binding
Mercury in any cosmetic — trace unavoidable under good manufacturing practice (21 CFR 700.13(d)(2)(i)), calculated as elemental mercuryless than 1 part per million (0.0001 percent)1 ppm = 1 mg/kg = 1,000 µg/kgBinding regulation (adulteration rule)
Mercury in eye-area cosmetics as a preservative where no effective safe nonmercurial alternative exists (21 CFR 700.13(d)(2)(ii)), calculated as elemental mercuryno more than 65 parts per million (0.0065 percent)65 ppm = 65 mg/kg = 65,000 µg/kgBinding regulation, narrow exception

The lead guidance states verbatim: “we are recommending a maximum level of 10 ppm for lead as an impurity in cosmetic lip products (such as lipsticks, lip glosses, and lip liners) and externally applied cosmetics (such as eye shadows, blushes, shampoos, and body lotions) marketed in the United States.” The mercury regulation states verbatim that FDA “will regard as adulterated within the meaning of section 601(a) of the Act any cosmetic containing mercury” unless the mercury content “is unavoidable under good manufacturing practice and is less than 1 part per million (0.0001 percent), calculated as elemental mercury” or the product “is intended for use only in the area of the eye” with “no more than 65 parts per million (0.0065 percent) of mercury, calculated as elemental mercury,” where no effective and safe nonmercurial preservative is available.

Separately, certifiable color additives carry FDA ingredient-level heavy-metal specifications — arsenic not more than 3 ppm and mercury not more than 1 ppm in color additives generally — these are ingredient approvals, not finished-product limits, and are not registered as caps in this wiki.

No numeric finished-cosmetic limits exist for cadmium, arsenic (other than the color-additive specifications), nickel, or chromium in the US federal framework.

How tested

FDA surveys cosmetics by ICP-MS-based multi-element methods (see FDA’s testing page for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, mercury, and nickel in cosmetics). The draft guidance does not prescribe a method; enforcement is by the adulteration doctrine (FD&C Act § 601) supported by FDA survey data.

Enforcement posture

The 10 ppm lead value is a recommendation; FDA stated it would not itself constitute a basis for enforcement and the guidance was never finalized. Real-world federal action against metal-contaminated cosmetics proceeds case-by-case as adulteration. The mercury rule, by contrast, is codified and directly enforceable. Several states fill the federal lead gap with their own numeric limits (e.g., Washington TFCA’s 1000 µg/kg lead limit in toothpaste — Washington State Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act — Toothpaste Pb 1000 ppb statutory limit).

History of changes

  • 1974-03-15: 21 CFR 700.13 published (39 FR 10054), codifying the mercury-in-cosmetics adulteration position (trade-correspondence opinions TC-9 and TC-412 withdrawn; skin-bleaching mercury action dating to 1973-01-05).
  • 2016-12: FDA issued the draft guidance “Lead in Cosmetic Lip Products and Externally Applied Cosmetics: Recommended Maximum Level” and a supporting document. Still draft as of 2026-07-29.

Comparison with other jurisdictions

Sources

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
9882fa9f2026-08-04major2 sections added
38cedd112026-08-04majorContamination-profile values revised; 7 sections added; narrative text revised