COT 2003 - metals in UK infant foods and formulae
The UK Committee on Toxicity reviewed an FSA survey of 189 commercial infant-food and formula samples. The survey covered infant formulae, manufactured baby foods, desserts, rusks, and infant drinks, and estimated infant dietary exposure by age band and diet scenario. The analytical method measured total metals only, so arsenic, chromium, and mercury species are not substituted for iAs, Cr(VI), or MeHg.
Key numbers
- Sample frame:
189commercial baby-food samples were analysed; the survey covered products on sale in the UK fromMarch 2001toJuly 2002. - Method scope: ICP-MS measured total concentrations and did not determine individual species of each metal.
- Mercury occurrence: infant-food mercury mean/range was
3 µg/kg, range<0.5 - 20, compared with the previous survey’s1.4 µg/kg, range<0.3 - 10. - Fish-containing meals: the current survey had
7fish-containing foods out of189, compared with2out of97in the previous survey; COT states fish-containing meals provided only a minor contribution to the overall mean mercury concentration. - Soy formula: average concentrations were higher in soya formula than in cows’ milk formula except for mercury, especially nickel and aluminum, where concentrations were
2 to 3 timeshigher. - Aluminum exposure from manufacturers’ consumption guidelines: normal diet
14,142,175, and177 µg/kg bw/dayfor ages 0-3, 4-6, 7-9, and 10-12 months; soya diet82,242,222, and218. - Total arsenic exposure: normal diet
0.09,1.3,1.8, and1.8 µg/kg bw/day; soya diet0.18,1.6,2.0, and1.9. The statement notes the highest arsenic levels were in fish-containing dishes and were likely predominantly organic arsenic. - Cadmium exposure: normal diet
0.04,0.35,0.61, and0.64 µg/kg bw/day; soya diet0.22,0.57,0.68, and0.72. - Lead exposure: normal diet
0.08,0.37,0.51, and0.52 µg/kg bw/day; soya diet0.22,0.56,0.59, and0.61. - Total mercury exposure: normal diet
0.07,0.18,0.18, and0.19 µg/kg bw/day; soya diet0.07,0.19,0.19, and0.20. - Nickel exposure: normal diet
0.7,4.2,5.8, and5.9 µg/kg bw/day; soya diet4.2,8.4,7.6, and7.9. - Tin exposure: normal diet
0.57,4.6,18.6, and18.5 µg/kg bw/day; soya diet0.62,4.7,19.7, and20.1. - Water context: at the then-permitted inorganic-arsenic drinking-water level of
50 µg/L, water used to reconstitute formula could contribute3 to 5 µg/kg bw/day; at10 µg/L, the potential contribution could be0.6 to 1 µg/kg bw/day.
Methods (brief)
FSA analysed infant formulae, manufactured baby foods, desserts, rusks, and infant drinks by ICP-MS. Exposure scenarios used older NDNS consumption data, an SCF high-consumer food-consumption figure, and manufacturers’ feeding guidelines. The COT considered the feeding-guideline approach a worst-case scenario; water used to reconstitute formula or dried foods was not included in the survey exposure estimates.
Implications
Certification (HMTc): This source contributes A-tier infant-food and formula occurrence/exposure context for UK products, but its arsenic and mercury values are total metals only. It should not be pooled as iAs or MeHg occurrence.
Courses: The statement illustrates infant exposure uncertainty from feeding assumptions, reconstitution water, and speciation absence.
App: The source can support UK infant-food profiles for total arsenic, cadmium, lead, total mercury, nickel, aluminum, and tin, with soy-formula context kept separate.
Wiki pages this source may touch
- infant-food-general
- baby-food
- infant-formula-powder
- infant-formula-powder-soy-based
- infant-cereal
- infant-juice
- fish-containing-baby-foods
- arsenic-total
- cadmium
- lead
- mercury-total
- nickel
- tin
Verification notes
- PDF text was extracted with
pdftotext -layoutto/tmp/hmi_row_1453.txt; paragraphs 3-19 and Table 1 were re-read before writing. - Identity checks before creation: title phrase, raw handle
MFK_cot-2003-infant-metals, raw SHA-25610a78fce18a793bc3ca2bac54be37f1b43f19b2239020226c52b1151d057d7e6, and cite keycot2003-infant-food-metalswere searched inwiki/sources/; no existing source page was found. - Units are preserved as
µg/kgfor product concentrations andµg/kg bw/dayfor exposure estimates. - Speciation: the source states the analytical method did not determine metal species. Arsenic is recorded as
tAs, mercury astHg, and chromium as total Cr; no iAs, MeHg, or Cr(VI) values were inferred. - Brand firewall: the survey considered main types and brands on sale, but this page records category and diet-scenario values only.
Page history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.
| Commit | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 4039d20 | 2026-06-10 | scope: broaden ingest to the full upstream+downstream literature (marine, atmospheric, attribution, exposure, toxicology) — inclusion is the default |