Skip to content

Li 2019 - plastic food packaging metal migration

Li, Lee, and Zhan report a Shimadzu application-note experiment measuring 14 elements leached from plastic food-packaging materials into aqueous simulants by ICP-MS. The evidence is C-tier because it is a vendor application note rather than a peer-reviewed paper, but it contains routeable food-contact-material leachate values for PS and PP containers and PE film. The results are migration into simulants, not metal concentrations in food as consumed.

Key numbers

  • Source identity: Shimadzu Application News No. AD-0207; PDF metadata creation date 13 November 2019; 5 PDF pages.
  • Materials: polystyrene (PS) container, polypropylene (PP) container, and polyethylene (PE) film obtained from local food markets.
  • Leaching setup: 0.5 grams of each packaging material immersed in 40 mL of aqueous solution at room temperature. Simulants were DI water (simulant A), 3% acetic acid (simulant B), and 2% nitric acid.
  • Analysis setup: after immersion, 1 mL of soaking solution was mixed with 1 mL of 3% acetic acid and diluted to 10 mL; calibration standards were prepared up to 50 ppb for Al, As, Cd, Co, Mn, Ni, and Sb or 200 ppb for Ba, Cr, Cu, Fe, Li, Pb, and Zn.
  • Table 2 method performance: calibration coefficients were r >0.9999 for all targeted elements. LODs were sub-ppb for all analytes, including As 0.005 µg/L, Cd 0.001 µg/L, and Pb 0.123 µg/L.
  • Table 3 spike recovery: 10 ppb spikes in simulant B from PS and PP samples gave recovery rates from 87% to 116% across 14 elements, with most triplicate RSDs below 3%.
  • Contact-time result: Figure 2 is graphical only in the extracted text; the authors state qualitatively that migration into simulant B increased from 1h to 72h for both PS container and PE film.

Table 4 migration into food simulant B after 72 hours

Values are copied with the source table’s unit label, µg/kg; N.D. is the source notation. The results prose describes the same concentrations as µg/L, so the table/prose unit conflict is flagged in Verification notes.

ElementPS containerPP containerPE filmMDL
Al49.371.4135.52.01
As0.110.060.480.05
Ba14.07.1422.90.05
CdN.D.N.D.0.260.012
CoN.D.N.D.N.D.0.006
Cr6.500.150.840.13
Cu30.419.613.31.23
Fe17.02.39142.51.04
LiN.D.N.D.N.D.0.64
Mn2.51N.D.52.80.08
Ni8.811.862.140.67
Pb2.220.193.270.06
Sb0.080.040.400.006
Zn34.6023.50685.50.73

The text highlights PE film as having Zn 685.5, Fe 142.5, and Al 135.5 among the highest leachate values; for PS and PP containers, the most leached element was Al followed by Zn and Cu. Arsenic and lead were detected across 0.06 - 0.48 and 0.19 - 3.27, respectively, using the source’s prose units; cadmium was detected only from PE film at 0.26.

Table 5 PE film migration into different aqueous solutions

Values are copied as µg/kg.

ElementFood Simulant A DI water2% HNO3Food Simulant B 3% acetic acid
Al21.029.9135.5
As0.010.150.48
Ba13.415.822.9
CdN.D.0.050.26
CoN.D.N.D.N.D.
Cr0.030.690.84
Cu1.943.8613.3
Fe3.7273.0142.5
LiN.D.N.D.N.D.
Mn1.0915.952.8
Ni0.911.372.14
Pb0.022.543.27
Sb0.040.080.40
Zn31.4127.5685.5

Methods (brief)

The application note used a Shimadzu ICPMS-2030 with helium collision-cell mode for all elements except Li and Sb. Samples were prepared from plastic packaging pieces leached at room temperature into DI water, 3% acetic acid, or 2% nitric acid; tabled PS/PP/PE comparisons use food simulant B after 72 hours. Calibration used multi-element standards, online internal standards (Sc, Y, Rh, Bi), blank-derived LOD/LOQ estimates, and 10 ppb spike-recovery checks in PS and PP simulant B extracts.

Implications

Certification (HMTc): This source is small, C-tier food-contact-material leachate evidence for plastic packaging rows. It should not be pooled with food-as-consumed values and should carry the application-note quality caveat.

Courses: The note is a compact example of how simulant choice and contact time can change apparent metal migration from packaging materials.

App: If surfaced, the source can support a food-packaging-material context card that distinguishes PS/PP containers from PE film and keeps 3% acetic acid leachate values separate from DI-water or nitric-acid simulants.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • PDF text was extracted with pdftotext -layout to /tmp/ingest.txt; the overview, sample preparation, analytical conditions, Tables 2-5, contact-time paragraph, conclusion, and references were checked against this page.
  • Identity checks before creation: title phrase, Application News number AD-0207, raw SHA-256 b9e53b47d199040dcf9bae2b8ffa620d1cb53f1ddaace538152b835281c22567, raw handle MFK_evaluation-of-heavy-metal-migration-from-plastic, and cite key li2019-plastic-packaging-metal-migration were searched in wiki/sources/ and evidence files; only intake/tracker CSV rows were found.
  • DOI status: no DOI is printed in the PDF metadata or extracted text. The page uses doi: null and no_doi_assigned: true.
  • Unit fidelity: Tables 4 and 5 label migration values as µg/kg; the surrounding prose describes Table 4 values as µg/L. I retained the table units for tabular values and explicitly flagged the source-internal conflict rather than converting.
  • Speciation: arsenic and chromium are not speciated. The source reports elemental ICP-MS leachate results, so frontmatter uses tAs for arsenic and Cr for total chromium; no Cr(VI) or inorganic arsenic values are inferred.
  • Brand firewall: the Shimadzu instrument/vendor name is retained only as method/source identity. No consumer brand names from sampled packaging are reported or attached to values.
  • Closed-vocabulary check: product routing uses broad existing plastic packaging rows. Exact PS-container, PP-container, and PE-film forms are retained in the source text and not invented as product slugs.

Page history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateDescription
4039d202026-06-10scope: broaden ingest to the full upstream+downstream literature (marine, atmospheric, attribution, exposure, toxicology) — inclusion is the default