Skip to content

JECFA 2007 - Aluminium PTWI and methylmercury subgroup guidance

JECFA’s 67th report is a primary international committee source for two metal-relevant guidance values. For aluminium, the committee withdrew prior ADIs/PTWI values and established a PTWI of 1 mg/kg bw/week as elemental Al for all aluminium compounds in food, including additives, after concluding that reproductive and developmental nervous-system effects occurred at lower doses than the older 7 mg/kg bw/week PTWI had assumed. For methylmercury, the committee confirmed the 2003 PTWI of 1.6 ug/kg bw/week for women who are or may become pregnant and for children up to about age 17, while clarifying that adults outside those groups could tolerate intakes up to about twice that level without adult neurotoxicity concern. The methylmercury section also concluded that fish maximum-level exclusions alone are often a weak population exposure-reduction tool compared with targeted species advice for higher-risk subgroups.

Key numbers

Aluminium health-based guidance and toxicology basis:

ParameterValueNotes
New aluminium PTWI1 mg/kg bw/week as AlApplies to all aluminium compounds in food, including food additives
Previous aluminium PTWI0-7 mg/kg bw/weekWithdrawn by this report
Prior temporary ADI for aluminium salts added to food0-0.6 mg/kg bw/day as AlWithdrawn with prior aluminium ADIs
Lower end of dietary-study LOEL range50 mg/kg bw/day as AlUsed as point of departure
Dietary-study LOEL range50-75 mg/kg bw/day as AlFrom mouse, rat, and dog dietary studies
Main uncertainty factor100Inter- and intraspecies differences
Additional uncertainty factor3Database limitations, including limited NOELs and long-term endpoint data
Beagle dog sodium aluminium phosphate basic NOEL27 mg/kg bw/day as Al702 mg/kg diet, 6-month study
Beagle dog high dose with male effects75 mg/kg bw/day as Al1922 mg/kg diet in males; females at 80 mg/kg bw/day had no effects
Reproductive/developmental LOEL range for soluble aluminium compounds13-200 mg/kg bw/day as AlAluminium nitrate studies; no NOELs identified
Neurobehavioral oral-dose effect range50-200 mg/kg bw/day as AlMore soluble compounds; one study also indicated 10 mg/kg bw/day NOEL
Absorption from most oral aluminium studiesless than 1%Citrate can increase absorption; silicates/phosphate may reduce absorption

Aluminium exposure and additive-use context:

Source or commodityValueNotes
Most foodsless than 5 mg/kg AlGeneral dietary background statement
Natural dietary aluminium exposure1-10 mg/day per personUp to 0.16 mg/kg bw/day for a 60-kg adult
Typical untreated water near pH 71-50 ug/L AlAcidic water can reach 1000 ug/L
Treated drinking-water exposure at 2 L/dayup to 0.4 mg/dayUp to 0.007 mg/kg bw/day
Food-contact material migration exposureup to 7 mg/dayConservative mean estimate; 0.1 mg/kg bw/day
Processed cheese with SALP provisionup to 35,000 mg/kg as AlCodex GSFA provision summarized in Table 5
Flour with SALP provisionup to 45,000 mg/kg as AlCodex GSFA provision summarized in Table 5
Bakery products with aluminium ammonium sulfateup to 10,000 mg/kgReporting basis not always specified
Salt with sodium/calcium aluminium silicateup to 20,000 mg/kgAnti-caking provisions
Salt with aluminium silicateup to 10,000 mg/kgAnti-caking provision
USA processed cheese example300 mg/kg AlHigher-Al processed-food examples submitted to the committee
USA home-made cornbread example400 mg/kg AlAttributed to Al-containing leavening agents
USA muffins example130 mg/kg AlHigher-Al processed-food examples
USA baking powder example2300 mg/kg AlHigher-Al processed-food examples
USA table salt example164 mg/kg AlHigher-Al processed-food examples
Germany biscuits example22 mg/kg AlHighest processed-food values reported for Germany
Germany soft cheese example8-16 mg/kg AlHighest processed-food values reported for Germany
UK 2000 total diet miscellaneous cereals19 mg/kg AlHighest mean concentration food group in that survey
China 1992-1993 total diet cereal products50 mg/kg AlAttributed to Al-containing leavening agents
Adult duplicate-diet mean exposure range3-13 mg/dayHighest single reported value: 100 mg/day
Adult model-diet / market-basket mean exposure range2 to more than 40 mg/dayFrance at low end; China above 40 mg/day
UK young children mean exposure0.16 mg/kg bw/dayAges 1.5-4.5 years
USA 2-year-old children mean exposureabout 0.5 mg/kg bw/dayBased on 12-kg body weight
China children mean exposureabout 1 mg/kg bw/dayAges 2-7 and 8-12 years
UK young children high-exposure estimate0.33 mg/kg bw/dayAges 1.5-4.5 years
Human/cow milk aluminiumless than 0.05 mg/LNegligible in the committee exposure assessment
Cow-milk-based formula ready-to-drink aluminium0.01-0.4 mg/LReconstituted / ready-to-drink product
Soy-based formula ready-to-drink aluminium0.4-6 mg/LReconstituted / ready-to-drink product
Infant exposure, soy-based formula high valueup to 1 mg/kg bw/day3-month, 6-kg infant consuming 1 L/day
Infant exposure, milk-based formula high value0.06 mg/kg bw/daySame infant-consumption assumption
Adult mean exposure from overall diet including additives14-280 mg/weekTable 6; 20-500% of PTWI for a 60-kg adult

Methylmercury guidance and fish-risk-management context:

ParameterValueNotes
Confirmed methylmercury PTWI1.6 ug/kg bw/weekEstablished in 2003; confirmed here
Prior methylmercury PTWI3.3 ug/kg bw/weekClarified as withdrawn in 2003
Maternal hair BMDL/NOEL anchor14 ug/g mercuryFaroe Islands and Seychelles neurodevelopmental cohorts
Maternal blood equivalent56 ug/L methylmercuryConverted from maternal hair concentration
Daily intake equivalent before uncertainty factor1.5 ug/kg bw/dayUsed to derive the PTWI
Uncertainty factor for PTWI derivation6.4Existing 2003 derivation
Adults outside pregnancy/childbearing concernup to about 2x PTWICommittee considered this not a neurotoxicity risk for adults
Women who are or may become pregnantdo not exceed PTWITo protect embryo/fetus
Infants and children up to about age 17no higher safe intake identifiedCommittee could not identify a level above the PTWI without developmental neurotoxicity concern
Current Codex guideline level, predatory fish1.0 mg/kg methylmercuryEvaluated for impact on exposure and risk
Current Codex guideline level, non-predatory fish0.5 mg/kg methylmercuryEvaluated for impact on exposure and risk
Effect of excluding above-guideline high-Hg species30-100% lower mean in those speciesFrance, UK, and USA submissions; required removing most samples of those species
French sensitivity noted by committee0.5 mg/kg cutoff for all fishNeeded before women exceeding PTWI fell significantly; children 3-10 still not significantly reduced

Methods (brief)

For aluminium, JECFA began from IPCS and UK COT assessments, reviewed published animal and human evidence, and assessed exposure from natural food content, drinking-water, food-contact materials, food additives, infant formulae, and non-dietary sources. No original toxicological data on aluminium-containing food additives were submitted. The committee considered dietary studies more relevant than gavage studies, used the lower end of the 50-75 mg/kg bw/day dietary LOEL range as the point of departure, applied uncertainty factors of 100 and 3, and expressed the guidance value as a PTWI because of potential bioaccumulation.

For methylmercury, the committee did not recalculate a new PTWI. It reviewed new toxicokinetic, toxicological, epidemiological, infant/child, adult, cardiovascular, and fish-risk-management evidence since the 61st meeting, then clarified which subgroups remained covered by the 1.6 ug/kg bw/week PTWI and how guideline levels for fish affect exposure.

Implications

The aluminium section is routeable as toxicological and regulatory-context evidence for aluminium-containing food additives, baked/cereal products, salt anti-caking uses, processed cheese/cocoa applications, drinking-water, food-contact materials, and infant formula exposure. It should not be treated as a new market survey for HMTc product percentiles, but its commodity examples and exposure ranges can support page context and audit decisions about aluminium as an additive-driven exposure source.

The methylmercury section strengthens the distinction between a sensitive-subgroup PTWI and adult neurotoxicity guidance. It also supports seafood pages by documenting why broad fish maximum levels may have limited population impact when the market is dominated by low-mercury species, while species-specific advice can still matter for consumers who preferentially eat high-mercury fish.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Read the full 104-page PDF text, with close checks on the title/citation pages, contents, section 4.1 on aluminium, Table 5 aluminium additive provisions, Table 6 dietary exposure ranges, section 4.3 on methylmercury, section 6 recommendations, and Annex 2 contaminant-summary entries.
  • The PDF provides no DOI and carries WHO/FAO all-rights-reserved copyright language. The WHO publication page identifies ISBN 978-92-4-120940-3 and WHO Technical Report Series 940.
  • WHO_TRS_940_eng 2.pdf is byte-identical to the canonical WHO_TRS_940_eng.pdf file (sha256 782f8a3326e26b4aada1c3837fa90f83f54ba77e1159f6c7e5e0653068a84195) and is tracked as a duplicate rather than a second source.

Page history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateDescription
140e84e2026-06-03refresh manual fetch generated outputs
10b548d2026-06-03repair June 2 tracker: zlotko2021-black-soldier-fly-chitin-nickel-sorption