Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Exposure of women to trace elements through the skin by direct contact with underwear clothing

Source

Nguyen and Saleh measured extractable inorganic elements in 120 women’s undergarment samples made from cotton, nylon, and polyester.

Page snapshot
Cited by10 pages
Metals measured22
Evidence tierB
Year2016

Overview

Nguyen and Saleh measured extractable inorganic elements in 120 women’s undergarment samples made from cotton, nylon, and polyester. The paper reports concentrations in mg/kg after 5% nitric-acid extraction, not total digestion of the entire textile. Brand names appear in the Methods sample list but are not attached to any contamination values here.

Key numbers

  • Sample frame: 120 women’s underwear samples, consisting of 63 cotton, 44 nylon, and 13 polyester garments, manufactured in 14 countries and spanning colors including black, blue, brown, cream, green, grey, khaki, multi-color, navy blue, orange, pink, purple, red, yellow, and white.
  • Aluminum: cotton garments ranged from 5 to 652 mg/kg; nylon garments ranged from 11 to 220 mg/kg; polyester garments were all less than 7 mg/kg.
  • Iron: cotton garments ranged from 16 to 163 mg/kg; nylon garments ranged from 13 to 22 mg/kg; polyester garments ranged from 2 to 51 mg/kg.
  • Zinc: one red cotton sample was reported at 300 mg/kg; nylon garments ranged from 4 to 8 mg/kg; polyester garments ranged from 2 to 65 mg/kg.
  • Chromium: cotton garments ranged from 0 to 7 mg/kg; nylon garments reached 118 and 94 mg/kg in black and green colors; polyester garments ranged from 0 to 1 mg/kg. The paper states that 5 samples were above 100 mg/kg, 12 above 50 mg/kg, 21 above 25 mg/kg, 61 above 10 mg/kg, and 21 up to 10 mg/kg.
  • Cobalt: cotton garments ranged from 0.01 to 0.19 mg/kg; nylon garments ranged from 0.0 to 28 mg/kg, with red, yellow, and black nylon values as high as 7, 15, and 28 mg/kg; polyester ranged from 0.0 to 0.03 mg/kg.
  • Manganese: one black cotton sample was 59 mg/kg; only two samples were higher than 10 mg/kg; cotton averages were 1.1-3.6 mg/kg except black at 11.6 mg/kg; nylon and polyester ranges were 0.4-5.5 mg/kg and 0.2-4.9 mg/kg.
  • Arsenic: 4 samples exceeded the 0.2 mg/kg direct-skin-contact comparison level; average concentration ranged from below detection limit to 0.35 mg/kg.
  • Lead: 17 samples exceeded the recommended limit, including 7 with more than twice the recommended level; samples with lead concentrations between 1 and 2 mg/kg included 8 samples, mostly cotton. The extracted text does not provide a single full lead range.
  • Nickel: 6 samples exceeded the 1 mg/kg limit but were less than 4 mg/kg; average concentration ranged from below detection limit to 1.74 mg/kg.
  • Cadmium: one red cotton sample was up to 0.41 mg/kg; four other samples were at 0.1 mg/kg; the remainder were below the 0.1 mg/kg comparison level.

Methods (brief)

Five grams of each sample were shredded and homogenized. In triplicate, 100 mg of fabric was extracted in 10 mL of 5% nitric acid at 85-90 °C for 30 min, filtered, and transferred to ICP-MS autosampler tubes. Quantitative analysis used an Agilent 7500 ICP-MS with ASX 500 autosampler. Reference-material recovery ranged from 89% to 104%. Detection limits were 0.01 mg/kg for Ag, Bi, Cd, Fe, Pb, Ti, and Zn; 0.03 mg/kg for Be, Co, Cu, Mn, Se, Sb, and Sr; 0.05 mg/kg for As, Hg, Mg, and Ni; 0.13 mg/kg for Ba, Ca, Cr, K, Li, Na, and V; and 0.25 mg/kg for Al.

Implications

Certification (HMTc): This source contributes direct-skin-contact textile occurrence context for underwear, routed through the broad fabric-contact product slug because the closed vocabulary has no general underwear row. It should not be pooled with food or menstrual-product rows.

Courses: The paper is useful for distinguishing extractable textile metals from total product digestion and for showing how color, fiber, and manufacturing origin can confound textile comparisons.

App: The source supports a fabric-contact product context note for Cr, Pb, Ni, Cd, Co, Al, Fe, Zn, Mn, and tAs in direct-skin-contact underwear.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • PDF text was extracted with pdftotext -layout to /tmp/hmi_row_1581.txt; Methods, Figure 1 narrative, and element-specific Results paragraphs were re-read before writing.
  • Identity checks before creation: DOI 10.1080/10934529.2016.1221212, raw handle MFK_nguyen2016, raw SHA-256 f5d5b352b1ba4a9e08ee1c14c90dd50db60b3497d11e6ab3ed711c098b5392d1, and cite key nguyen2016-underwear-trace-elements were searched in wiki/sources/ and evidence files; no existing source page was found.
  • Units are preserved as mg/kg; no conversion to ppm was made.
  • Speciation: arsenic and mercury are elemental totals from ICP-MS extraction (tAs, tHg); chromium is total Cr, not Cr(VI).
  • Brand firewall: brand names listed in the sampling paragraph are omitted from Key numbers and no brand is attached to any value.
  • Closed-vocabulary note: no general underwear product slug exists, so products/fabric-contact-products-other is used. period-underwear-reusable-garments was not used because the source is ordinary underwear rather than menstrual/period underwear.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c32026-08-04major1 section added
3171d069e2026-08-02major1 section added
90a2f9a382026-07-30major1 section added and 1 removed; narrative text revised
eaa8eeeed2026-07-27major1 section added
50de6ab212026-07-27minorNarrative text revised