Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Manganese levels in infant formula and young child nutritional beverages in the United States and France: Comparison to breast milk and regulations

Source

This PLOS ONE study measured manganese in 44 infant formulas and young-child nutritional beverage products from the United States and France using simultaneous PIXE/RBS analysis.

Page snapshot
Cited by12 pages
Metals measured1
Evidence tierA
Year2019

Overview

This PLOS ONE study measured manganese in 44 infant formulas and young-child nutritional beverage products from the United States and France using simultaneous PIXE/RBS analysis. Products included cow-milk, goat-milk, soy, rice, amino-acid, chocolate-containing, supplemented, and unsupplemented products labeled from birth through 3 years. The occurrence signal is not a toxic-metal contaminant in the usual Pb/Cd/As/Hg sense, but it is important for infant formula risk assessment because Mn has neurodevelopmental toxicity concerns at excess exposure.

Key numbers

United States market products (Table 1; n=25):

MetricMn (ug/g dried product)Mn (ug/L prepared product)Mn (ug/100 kcal prepared product)
Minimum1.316026
Maximum322800860
Mean5.0650110
Median2.740055

French market products (Table 2; n=19):

MetricMn (ug/g dried product)Mn (ug/L prepared product)Mn (ug/100 kcal prepared product)
Minimum1.520032
Maximum5.91200140
Mean2.639055
Median2.131046

Regulatory comparison and ingredient-class findings:

  • Across all tested products, Mn mass fractions ranged from 1.3 to 32 ug/g, and prepared-product concentrations ranged from 160 to 2800 ug/L.
  • The authors compare these values with typical human breast milk Mn means of about 3-6 ug/L.
  • Thirty-four of 44 products listed supplemental Mn.
  • Seven of 25 US products exceeded the Codex guidance upper level of 100 ug Mn/100 kcal used for infant formula; two were labeled as infant-formula products and five were labeled for children older than 12 months.
  • None of the 17 French powdered infant or follow-on formulas exceeded the 100 ug Mn/100 kcal maximum used in French/EU rules; one French liquid complementary food reached 140 ug/100 kcal but was outside the formula category.
  • The highest value, 860 ug/100 kcal, came from a supplemented rice-based product labeled for young children.

Methods (brief)

Samples were selected by maximum-variation sampling to capture product types expected to span high and low Mn content. Powdered samples were reconstituted according to product labels and dried-product mass was measured to convert directly measured ug/g values to ug/L prepared product and ug/100 kcal. The analytical method combined particle-induced X-ray emission (PIXE) with Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS). Accuracy was checked with NIST SRM 1849a infant/adult nutritional formula: certified Mn 49.59 +/- 0.97 ug/g; measured Mn 49.48 +/- 1.61 ug/g; relative error -0.22%.

Implications

Standards work: This source is a strong formula/nutritional-beverage Mn distribution source and is relevant to infant formula standards discussions, especially where formula products are supplemented with Mn or contain soy/rice ingredients. It should not be treated as Pb/Cd/As/Hg contamination evidence.

Courses: Useful for teaching why nutrient elements can become toxicology-relevant at high intakes and why prepared-product units (ug/L and ug/100 kcal) matter for infant formula.

App: Supports Mn context for formula products, especially soy-, rice-, amino-acid-, and toddler-formula variants. Preserve the paper’s non-probabilistic sampling caveat; the sample was designed to find high/low ranges, not estimate market-weighted prevalence.

Microbiome: Not addressed.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Fresh auto-fetch ingest 2026-05-19 from the gap-driven infant-formula Mn wishlist.
  • Strict brand firewall: the source tables use study IDs rather than commercial names; this page reports aggregate values and product-form/protein-source descriptors only.
  • The paper’s sampling method is explicitly non-probabilistic maximum-variation sampling, so the table means and medians should not be generalized to market prevalence.
  • Methods vendor/equipment/reference-material names are retained under Part 12 Exception 2.

Update history

This page has no substantive edit history yet. Future revisions will be recorded here once the change lands in git.