Overview
EFSA’s Scientific Panel reviewed inorganic tin occurrence, dietary intake, and toxicity evidence to assess whether a tolerable upper intake level could be derived. The opinion is not a new market survey, but it is an A-tier regulatory anchor for tin migration from cans into foods. It identifies tinned fruit and vegetables as the main dietary sources of tin and preserves tin as inorganic tin/elemental tin (Sn) context rather than organotin occurrence.
Key numbers
- UK adult mean tin intake from food was estimated at
1.8 mg/day, ranging up to about6 mg/day; French mean daily intake was estimated at2.7 mg tin/day. - EFSA reports that the main dietary sources of tin are tinned fruit and vegetables.
- Acute gastrointestinal effects were considered more likely with tin concentrations of
250 mg/kgin canned foods and150 mg/kgin canned beverages. - EU maximum levels for inorganic tin were
200 mg/kgin canned foods and100 mg/kgin canned beverages. - A UK study found canned fruits, including tomato and tomato products, pineapple, orange, grapefruit, and pear, were most likely to contain elevated tin; tomato products and pineapple categories each had some samples containing more than
250 mg Sn/kg. - UK mean upper- and lower-bound estimated total dietary tin intakes for
1976to1982ranged from4.35-2.41and4.42-2.30 mg Sn per day, respectively. - UK 1997 Total Diet Study estimated population average tin intake at
1.8 mg/day; the97.5 percentileintake was6.3 mg/day. - UK 1997 TDS Table 1: canned vegetables had mean tin concentration
411 mg/kg fresh weightand contributed1.353 mg/day; fruit products had7.211 mg/kg fresh weightand contributed0.317 mg/day; total intake was1.8 mg/day. - France: foods preserved in unlacquered cans contained
76.6 ± 36.5 mg/kg; foods stored in lacquered cans contained3.2 ± 2.3 mg/kg; fresh foods contained0.03 ± 0.03 mg/kg. - France: tin intake was estimated at
2.7 mg/day, equivalent to0.04 mg/kg body weight; food stored in tin cans accounted for98%of intake while representing5.6%of daily food consumption.
Methods (brief)
This EFSA opinion reviewed existing occurrence, intake, toxicokinetic, and toxicity studies rather than commissioning new sampling. Occurrence/intake evidence included total diet studies, duplicate diet studies, canned-food surveys, and canned beverage/food case reports. The tin values in this page are retained in the original mg/kg, mg/day, and mg/kg body weight units.
Related evidence
- Canned Vegetables — REDIRECT (Cat 7 sub-variant of Canned foods, general)
- Canned Fruit — REDIRECT (Cat 7 sub-variant of Canned foods, general)
- Canned Tomatoes — REDIRECT (Cat 7 sub-variant of Canned foods, general)
- Cans/lids
- Tin
- Tin, Inorganic
Update history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git.
| Commit | Date | Change | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| b01ec52c31 | 2026-08-04 | major | 1 section added |
| 3171d069e3 | 2026-08-02 | major | 1 section added |
| 90a2f9a38e | 2026-07-30 | major | 1 section added and 1 removed; narrative text revised |
| eaa8eeeedf | 2026-07-27 | major | 1 section added |
| 50de6ab217 | 2026-07-27 | minor | Narrative text revised |
