Uroko et al. 2020 — Heavy metals in canned tomato paste from Ubani-Umuahia
Uroko and colleagues measured nine metals in ten canned tomato-paste products sold at Ubani-Umuahia market in Nigeria. Table 1 reports coded sample concentrations in ppm, but this page aggregates the coded rows to avoid attaching values to named consumer products. Lead and nickel were not detected; chromium and cadmium were detected above the paper’s comparator values in all tested samples.
Key numbers
Aggregate Table 1 ranges for canned tomato paste, in ppm:
| Metal | Range or detection pattern | Source comparator |
|---|---|---|
| Pb | ND in all ten samples | 0.200 |
| Ni | ND in all ten samples | 0.200 |
| Cu | 0.059-0.118 | 2.000 |
| Co | 0.036-0.105 | 0.100 |
| Fe | 3.032-7.651 | 40.000 |
| Cr | 0.099-0.268 | 0.050 |
| Cd | 0.047-0.055 | 0.003 |
| Mn | 0.039-0.086 | 0.140 |
| Zn | ND in nine samples; 0.029 in one sample | 6.000 |
The text states that lead and nickel were not detected in all canned tomato pastes, copper, iron, and manganese were detected at low concentrations, and chromium and cadmium were high relative to their respective permissible limits. Daily-intake estimates in Table 2 were below the tolerable values cited by the source. Hazard-index values in Table 3 ranged from 0.0648 to 0.8194.
Methods (brief)
Ten canned tomato-paste products were removed from tins, dried in foil in a microwave oven at 70 C, and ground to powder. Each 0.5 g dried sample was digested with concentrated HNO3, HClO4, and HF in a 5:1:1 mixture, filtered, diluted with distilled water, and analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The authors calculated daily intake, hazard quotient, hazard index, carcinogenic risk index, and total cancer risk using EPA-style equations and a 62 kg body weight.
Implications
This source contributes Nigeria-market canned tomato-paste occurrence context for Pb, Ni, Cu, Co, Fe, total Cr, Cd, Mn, and Zn. It is directly relevant to canned-tomato and tomato-paste product routing, while the coded sample design and explicit brand list in the methods mean public-facing extraction should remain aggregate unless a later private evidence register needs code-level review. It is not suitable for Cr-VI routing because chromium is reported only as total Cr.
Verification notes
- PDF text extracted with
pdftotext -layout; the DOI, abstract, methods, Table 1, daily-intake table, hazard-index table, and discussion were readable. - DOI verified from the first page as
10.3329/jbs.v28i0.44705; DOI, raw handleMFK_uroko2019, and cite-key checks found no existing source page before creation. - All aggregate ranges in Key numbers were calculated from Table 1 without unit conversion. Units are preserved as
ppm. - Speciation: chromium is total Cr. The source does not report Cr-VI.
- Brand firewall: the methods section maps sample codes to named products; this page therefore reports only aggregate ranges and detection patterns, not code-level or brand-level contamination values.
- Frontmatter product and ingredient slugs were checked against
docs/gpt-collaboration/taxonomy-snapshot.md; no new slug was invented.
Page history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.
| Commit | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 9792010 | 2026-06-08 | ingest: garrity1990-mt1-tissue-specific-promoter fresh from MFK/heavy_metals_peptides |