Skip to content

Uroko et al. 2020 — Heavy metals in canned tomato paste from Ubani-Umuahia

Uroko and colleagues measured nine metals in ten canned tomato-paste products sold at Ubani-Umuahia market in Nigeria. Table 1 reports coded sample concentrations in ppm, but this page aggregates the coded rows to avoid attaching values to named consumer products. Lead and nickel were not detected; chromium and cadmium were detected above the paper’s comparator values in all tested samples.

Key numbers

Aggregate Table 1 ranges for canned tomato paste, in ppm:

MetalRange or detection patternSource comparator
PbND in all ten samples0.200
NiND in all ten samples0.200
Cu0.059-0.1182.000
Co0.036-0.1050.100
Fe3.032-7.65140.000
Cr0.099-0.2680.050
Cd0.047-0.0550.003
Mn0.039-0.0860.140
ZnND in nine samples; 0.029 in one sample6.000

The text states that lead and nickel were not detected in all canned tomato pastes, copper, iron, and manganese were detected at low concentrations, and chromium and cadmium were high relative to their respective permissible limits. Daily-intake estimates in Table 2 were below the tolerable values cited by the source. Hazard-index values in Table 3 ranged from 0.0648 to 0.8194.

Methods (brief)

Ten canned tomato-paste products were removed from tins, dried in foil in a microwave oven at 70 C, and ground to powder. Each 0.5 g dried sample was digested with concentrated HNO3, HClO4, and HF in a 5:1:1 mixture, filtered, diluted with distilled water, and analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The authors calculated daily intake, hazard quotient, hazard index, carcinogenic risk index, and total cancer risk using EPA-style equations and a 62 kg body weight.

Implications

This source contributes Nigeria-market canned tomato-paste occurrence context for Pb, Ni, Cu, Co, Fe, total Cr, Cd, Mn, and Zn. It is directly relevant to canned-tomato and tomato-paste product routing, while the coded sample design and explicit brand list in the methods mean public-facing extraction should remain aggregate unless a later private evidence register needs code-level review. It is not suitable for Cr-VI routing because chromium is reported only as total Cr.

Verification notes

  • PDF text extracted with pdftotext -layout; the DOI, abstract, methods, Table 1, daily-intake table, hazard-index table, and discussion were readable.
  • DOI verified from the first page as 10.3329/jbs.v28i0.44705; DOI, raw handle MFK_uroko2019, and cite-key checks found no existing source page before creation.
  • All aggregate ranges in Key numbers were calculated from Table 1 without unit conversion. Units are preserved as ppm.
  • Speciation: chromium is total Cr. The source does not report Cr-VI.
  • Brand firewall: the methods section maps sample codes to named products; this page therefore reports only aggregate ranges and detection patterns, not code-level or brand-level contamination values.
  • Frontmatter product and ingredient slugs were checked against docs/gpt-collaboration/taxonomy-snapshot.md; no new slug was invented.

Page history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateDescription
97920102026-06-08ingest: garrity1990-mt1-tissue-specific-promoter fresh from MFK/heavy_metals_peptides