Khandaker 2021 - Malaysian seaweed metal(loids)
Khandaker and colleagues measured 17 elements in cultivated Malaysian Eucheuma cottoni seaweed from Langkawi, Semporna, and Kota Belud. The study reports dry-weight concentrations in microgram per gram and estimates dietary intake, noncarcinogenic hazard, and carcinogenic risk for an assumed East Asian adult seaweed consumer. The paper labels chromium as Cr-VI and arsenic as As (III), but the analytical method was ICP-OES rather than a chromatographic speciation method.
Key numbers
Fresh seaweed samples were collected from Kota Belud and Semporna in March 2018 and from Pulau Dangli, Langkawi in September 2018. The authors collected 4 kg of fresh whole seaweed from each location, with samples obtained from at least four sublocations at each farming site. Table 3 reports location group sizes of LKW n = 3, SPN n = 3, and KBL n = 2.
Table 3 reports metal concentrations in microgram per gram as mean ± relative standard deviation (RSD), with range in parentheses:
| Metal | LKW | SPN | KBL | Overall mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | 8.47 ± 5.49 (6.75-11) | 3.75 ± 4.56 (2.75-4.75) | 10.85 ± 1.16 (9.76-11.94) | 7.69 |
| Cd | 1.73 ± 1.66 (1.6-1.95) | 1.7 ± 3.29 (1.4-2) | 1.45 ± 0.46 (1.23-1.67) | 1.63 |
| As (III) | 1.91 ± 6.47 (1.35-2.25) | 6.3 ± 2.86 (4.7-7.9) | 5 ± 7.75 (4.3-5.7) | 4.40 |
| Al | 69.2 ± 4.13 (47.6-98.6) | 18.55 ± 3.28 (16.7-20.4) | 36 ± 0.76 (32.4-39.6) | 41.3 |
| Mn | 13 ± 4.13 (6.5-25.6) | 3.35 ± 2.68 (2.5-4.2) | 4.7 ± 0.85 (3.53-5.88) | 7.02 |
| Cu | 2.38 ± 1.86 (1.8-2.9) | 1.225 ± 1.16 (0.85-1.6) | 1.3 ± 0.83 (0.91-1.70) | 1.64 |
| Zn | 18.2 ± 2.29 (15.7-20.75) | 13.875 ± 1.14 (12-15.75) | 22.3 ± 0.62 (13.4-31.2) | 18.1 |
| Fe | 283 ± 1.94 (232.5-324.2) | 160 ± 2.77 (133-187) | 239 ± 1.74 (215.1-262.9) | 227 |
| Ni | 12.97 ± 1.80 (12.3-13.4) | 10 ± 1.07 (8-12.75) | 10.6 ± 0.25 (6.9-14.3) | 10.0 |
| Cr-VI | 40.57 ± 1.50 (37-45.8) | 30.3 ± 1.75 (23.8-36.8) | 40.15 ± 2.27 (32.9-47.37) | 26.0 |
| Ag | 0.2 ± 3.96 (0.15-0.25) | 0.125 ± 4.88 (0.1-0.15) | 0.2 ± 2.84 (0.15-0.25) | 0.18 |
Table 2 reports LoD values in µg/kg: Pb 11.31, Cd 2.15, Al 3.08, Mn 1.20, Cu 1.89, Zn 0.89, Fe 1.01, As 14.51, Ni 1.97, Cr 4.66, Ag 0.35, and Si 37.94.
Table 1 reports CRM 7405-a recovery checks for HMT-relevant analytes: Pb certified 0.43 ± 0.03 mg/kg, recovered 0.45 ± 0.04, recovery 104.7%; Cd certified 0.79 ± 0.02, recovered 0.75 ± 0.03, recovery 94.9%; Al certified 147 ± 7, recovered 141 ± 6, recovery 95.9%; As certified 35.8 ± 0.9, recovered 35.26 ± 0.88, recovery 98.5%; Ni certified 2.2 ± 0.1, recovered 2.3 ± 0.08, recovery 104.6%; Cr certified 3.4 ± 0.1, recovered 3.29 ± 0.09, recovery 96.8%.
Table 4 estimates daily intake in Microgram Per Kilogram/kg/Day for an assumed East Asian adult consuming Malaysian seaweed at 10 g/adult/day and body weight 65 kg. Mean daily intakes were Pb 1.2, Cd 0.3, As 0.7, Ni 1.5, Cr-VI 4.0, Al 6.3, and Ag 0.03.
Table 5 reports noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic risk estimates for the same assumed intake scenario: Pb HQ 0.203 and LTCR 6.08 × 10−4; Cd HQ 0.171 and LTCR 4.89 × 10−3; As HQ 1.547 and LTCR 5.22 × 10−2; Ni HQ 0.053 and LTCR 1.34 × 10−1; Cr-VI HQ 0.912 and LTCR 1.03 × 10−1. The summed hazard index is 4.38, and the summed lifetime carcinogenic risk is 2.94 × 10−1.
Methods (brief)
Fresh Eucheuma cottoni seaweed was collected from three Malaysian farming locations, washed, cut, dried at 70 °C to constant dry weight, blended, and sieved through a 25 µm mesh. For each analysis, 0.5 g dw was digested with 10 mL HNO3 and 3 mL HCl on a hot plate at 100 °C for 2 h, filtered through Whatman No. 41 paper, diluted with 10 mL deionized water, and analyzed by ICP-OES (Optima 5300DV, PerkinElmer). Calibration used Agilent multi-element standard solution 2A in 5% HNO3; validation used NIST SRM 1400 and NMIJ CRM 7405-a. The authors state each sample was analyzed in duplicate.
Implications
This source provides dry-weight occurrence data for cultivated Malaysian seaweed in the seaweed-kelp-foods product row. It is directly relevant for Pb, Cd, Al, Ni, and the source-reported As (III) and Cr-VI values, while downstream extraction should keep the ICP-OES speciation limitation visible. The paper’s risk calculations are source-reported scenario estimates, not HMTc threshold calculations.
Verification notes
- PDF text extracted with
pdftotext -layout; title page, sample preparation, Tables 1-5, arsenic-speciation discussion, and conclusions were readable. - DOI
10.3390/foods10020381, raw handleMFK_khandaker2021, and cite-key checks found no existing source page before creation. - Table 3 concentration values, Table 2 LoDs, Table 1 recovery checks, Table 4 intake estimates, and Table 5 risk estimates were checked against extracted text. Units are preserved as
microgram per gram,µg/kg,mg/kg, andMicrogram Per Kilogram/kg/Day; no conversion was performed. - Speciation: the source labels the arsenic row
As (III)and chromium rowCr-VI. However, the method was ICP-OES, and the text acknowledges that ICP-OES usually provides elemental arsenic rather than a particular species. This page preserves the source labels in Key numbers and frontmatter while flagging that limitation. - Brand firewall: no sampled product brands are attached to contamination values. Instrument and standard vendors appear only in Methods.
- Frontmatter slugs were checked against
docs/gpt-collaboration/taxonomy-snapshot.md; no new slug was invented.
Page history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.
| Commit | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 9792010 | 2026-06-08 | ingest: garrity1990-mt1-tissue-specific-promoter fresh from MFK/heavy_metals_peptides |