Skip to content

Crespo-Barreiro et al. 2023 - Metals and PAHs in olive-pruning biochar

Crespo-Barreiro and colleagues scaled olive-tree-pruning biochar production from semi-pilot to pilot and industrial pyrolysers, then measured heavy metals, PAHs, pH, carbon stability, and germination-index phytotoxicity. The source is primary evidence for agricultural-input contamination and soil-amendment quality control, not food occurrence evidence: it measures biochar made from olive pruning residues and does not report metal concentrations in olives, olive oil, soil after application, or edible crops.

Key numbers

Biochar production codes

CodeReactor scaleTemperatureResidence time
B400Semi-pilot400 +/- 3 C40 min
B500Semi-pilot500 +/- 3 C40 min
B600Semi-pilot600 +/- 3 C40 min
BF600Pilot600 +/- 15 C40 min
BMECIndustrial666 +/- 50 C40 min

The industrial run processed 2330 kg of material. The pilot run processed 70 kg. The semi-pilot batches used 200 g feedstock.

Heavy metals in biochar

Table 4 reports total concentrations in mg/kg, mean +/- SD, n = 3. Censored values are shown as the source reports them.

MetalB400B500B600BF600BMECIBI 2015 thresholdEBC-Agro 2022 threshold
As<4<4<4<4<413-10013
Cd<0.8<0.8<0.8<0.8<0.81.4-391.5
Co0.49 +/- 0.0010.86 +/- 0.020.99 +/- 0.040.89 +/- 0.042.76 +/- 0.0734-100not listed
Cr1.84 +/- 0.0110.33 +/- 0.0240.99 +/- 0.0821.44 +/- 0.07129.34 +/- 0.1393-120090
Cu115.41 +/- 0.19137.52 +/- 0.26102.42 +/- 0.32149.26 +/- 0.09221.46 +/- 0.33143-600100
Hg<1<1<1<1<11-171
Mo<2<2<2<22.33 +/- 0.015-75not listed
Ni<25.8 +/- 0.0819.07 +/- 0.0810.75 +/- 0.1375.64 +/- 0.2947-42050
Pb<4<4<4<45.99 +/- 0.32121-300120
Se<4<4<4<4<42-200not listed
Zn43.26 +/- 0.3156.91 +/- 0.2136.69 +/- 0.2249.98 +/- 0.3351.31 +/- 51.31416-7400400

All samples were below IBI 2015 thresholds. The authors state that EBC-Agro 2022 is stricter: Cu exceeded the EBC-Agro limit in all five samples, while the industrial BMEC sample also exceeded the EBC-Agro Cr and Ni limits. The authors attribute Cu plausibly to copper phytosanitary treatment of olive trees followed by concentration during pyrolysis. They report the overall heavy-metal burden decreasing in the order BMEC > BF600 > B600 > B500 > B400.

PAHs, pH, and phytotoxicity

Total EPA 16-PAHs were 6.1 mg/kg (B400), 6.4 mg/kg (B500), 5.8 mg/kg (B600), 34.9 mg/kg (BF600), and 2.6 mg/kg (BMEC). Naphthalene was the dominant PAH in all samples and reached 28 mg/kg in BF600. The authors state that all samples met IBI PAH specifications, while B600 and BMEC were below the EBC-Agro 6 mg/kg limit, B400 and B500 were just above it, and BF600 exceeded it.

Biochar pH rose with scale/temperature: B400 8.14 +/- 0.18, B500 8.70 +/- 0.24, B600 9.10 +/- 0.06, BF600 9.71 +/- 0.19, BMEC 11.52 +/- 0.43. Electrical conductivity stayed below 1.80 dS/m.

Germination index (GI, %) showed that B600 was phytostimulant for all four test crops, while BMEC was phytotoxic for all four:

CodeTomato GICress GIRadish GILettuce GI
B4005.2 +/- 0.018119.9 +/- 2.6979.9 +/- 0.264.6 +/- 0.23
B500108.4 +/- 1.7656.6 +/- 0.69275.3 +/- 1.5619.1 +/- 0.16
B600130.5 +/- 2.54249.7 +/- 2.80368.3 +/- 2.29162.3 +/- 1.97
BF60063.0 +/- 1.322.4 +/- 0.1920.8 +/- 0.3053.5 +/- 1.89
BMEC8.3 +/- 0.361.2 +/- 0.0619.1 +/- 0.623.2 +/- 0.09

The authors interpret BMEC phytotoxicity primarily as an alkalinity problem (pH 11.52), while for samples with pH closer to neutrality they saw a tighter relationship between PAH concentration and phytotoxicity.

Carbon stability

R50 and gained-stability indices increased with production temperature and scale. Reported non-labile carbon stability was 90.00% (B400), 91.53% (B500), 92.50% (B600), 92.12% (BF600), and 94.05% (BMEC).

Methods (brief)

Olive pruning residues from a Spanish olive producer were pyrolysed in three reactor systems. The semi-pilot reactor tested 400, 500, and 600 C under helium carrier gas; the 600 C condition was then scaled to pilot and industrial equipment. Heavy metals were extracted from 0.5 g biochar with HCl/HNO3 and measured by ICP-OES, following European Biochar Certificate and International Biochar Initiative framing. PAHs were measured by Eurofins Umwelt Ost GmbH using hot toluene extraction and GC-MS according to DIN EN 16181:2019-08. Phytotoxicity used Zucconi-style germination index assays in tomato, cress, radish, and lettuce with five replicates per treatment. Carbon stability used the R50 thermogravimetric index after washing.

Implications

Certification: This source is useful for supplier-questionnaire and agricultural-input controls: olive-derived biochar can carry enough Cu, Cr, and Ni to exceed strict biochar/agricultural-amendment limits, particularly when industrial-scale temperature control drifts high. It should not be interpreted as evidence about olives or olive oil metal occurrence.

Courses: Good case study for the distinction between circular-economy agricultural inputs and food-matrix evidence. The same olive supply chain can produce a useful soil amendment, but the amendment’s contaminant profile still needs analytical verification before field use.

App: Route as agricultural-input context for biochar and soil amendments, especially where biochar is proposed as a heavy-metal immobilization or soil-health intervention.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

The PDF has author attribution and DOI 10.3390/agriculture13051064; no DOI conflict was observed. The source measures an agricultural soil amendment, not an edible commodity, so ingredients and products are intentionally empty. The table reports total As and total Hg only; no arsenic or mercury speciation is available. Censored values such as As <4 mg/kg and Cd <0.8 mg/kg are retained as censored biochar evidence rather than converted to zero. Company/supplier name from the methods section is omitted under the brand firewall.

Audit subagent (2026-06-02) flagged the BMEC Zn entry 51.31 +/- 51.31 as a paper-internal oddity: Table 4 in the published PDF prints mean and SD as the same numeric, which is almost certainly a source typo (the other four Zn rows have SD values one to two orders of magnitude smaller than the mean). The wiki page faithfully reproduces what the source prints; downstream synthesis should treat the BMEC Zn uncertainty as unreliable rather than as a genuine +/- 51.31 mg/kg interval.

Audit subagent (2026-06-02) also flagged that the matrices: entries (biochar, olive-pruning-biochar, agricultural-soil-amendment) are not in the example matrices vocabulary in docs/gpt-collaboration/system-prompt.md. Matrices is documented as an open-ended bare-string controlled vocabulary, and these slugs are the most accurate broad-scope descriptors for this agricultural-input source; they are proposed for inclusion if/when the matrices vocabulary is formalized. The [[supply-chain/soil-to-plant-transfer]] link in ## Wiki pages this source may touch is verified to exist at wiki/supply-chain/soil-to-plant-transfer.md and is not a missing slug; the audit’s concern was triggered by the taxonomy-snapshot.md covering only ingredients/products/metals/regulations.

Page history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateDescription
c1aef382026-06-02audit-queue: hamid2021-bacterial-plant-biostimulants-review audited-promote