Cheyns et al. 2021 - arsenic species in algae and cyanobacteria supplements
Cheyns and colleagues measured total arsenic and selected arsenic species in 33 algae- or cyanobacteria-based food supplements purchased in Belgium. The source is directly relevant to algae/seaweed supplement occurrence because it reports sample-level total As, inorganic As, DMA, arsenobetaine, recommended dose, and exposure estimates. All sample results are reported on a whole-weight, product-as-sold basis.
Key numbers
The abstract reports total As (Astot) concentrations in the range 0.053-57 mg/kg, with the highest concentrations in supplements containing brown algae. Inorganic As (Asi) concentrations were reported in the range <0.02-4.7 mg kg−1. The paper states that a large fraction of arsenic in algae/cyanobacteria supplements was present as arsenosugars and that negligible amounts of arsenobetaine were detected.
Table 1 reports concentrations in µg g−1. All rows below preserve the source’s sample IDs and units; no brand names are reported in the source.
| Source ID | Species in supplement | Astot | Asi | DMA | AB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FS1 | Chlorella | 0.31 | <0.020 | <0.020 | na |
| FS2 | Chlorella | 2.64 | 0.127 | 0.035 | 0.073 |
| FS3 | Chlorella | 0.63 | 0.031 | <0.020 | na |
| FS4 | Chlorella | 0.50 | 0.035 | <0.020 | na |
| FS5 | Chlorella + Spirulina | 0.13 | 0.071 | <0.020 | na |
| FS6 | Chlorella + Spirulina | 1.09 | 0.037 | <0.020 | 0.0203 |
| FS7 | Chlorella + Spirulina | 1.15 | 0.117 | <0.020 | 0.0237 |
| FS8 | Chlorella + Spirulina | 0.51 | 0.092 | <0.020 | na |
| FS9 | Chlorella + Spirulina | 0.97 | 0.155 | 0.02 | na |
| FS10 | Spirulina | 0.98 | 0.225 | <0.020 | na |
| FS11 | Spirulina | 0.064 | <0.020 | <0.020 | na |
| FS12 | Spirulina | 0.20 | 0.023 | <0.020 | na |
| FS13 | Spirulina | 0.44 | 0.083 | <0.020 | na |
| FS14 | Spirulina | 0.30 | 0.02 | <0.020 | na |
| FS15 | Spirulina | 2.81 | 0.034 | 0.37 | <0.092 |
| FS16 | Ascolphyllum nodosum | 57.18 | <0.020 | 2.407 | 1.862 |
| FS17 | Ascolphyllum nodosum | 5.00 | 0.11 | 0.4 | <0.092 |
| FS18 | Fucus vesiculosus | 0.24 | <0.020 | <0.020 | na |
| FS19 | Fucus vesiculosus | 0.65 | 0.022 | <0.020 | na |
| FS20 | Fucus vesiculosus | 0.092 | 0.042 | <0.020 | na |
| FS21 | Fucus vesiculosus | 0.053 | <0.020 | <0.020 | na |
| FS22 | Fucus vesiculosus | 0.23 | <0.020 | <0.020 | na |
| FS23 | Fucus vesiculosus | 0.43 | 0.027 | <0.020 | na |
| FS24 | Fucus vesiculosus | 5.50 | 0.045 | 0.072 | <0.092 |
| FS25 | Fucus vesiculosus | 0.48 | 0.118 | 0.029 | na |
| FS26 | Fucus vesiculosus | 0.11 | <0.020 | <0.020 | na |
| FS27 | Fucus vesiculosus, Undaria pinnatifida and brown algae | 0.47 | <0.020 | <0.020 | na |
| FS28 | Kelp (not specified) | 12.91 | 4.7 | 0.104 | 0.199 |
| FS29 | Kelp (not specified) | 23.90 | 0.43 | 0.61 | na |
| FS30 | Macrocystis pyrifera | 26.33 | 0.071 | 1.163 | 1.032 |
| FS31 | Lithothamnium Calcareum | 2.26 | 0.165 | <0.020 | na |
| FS32 | Lithothamnium Calcareum | 0.52 | 0.023 | <0.020 | na |
| FS33 | Lithothamnium Calcareum | 2.67 | 0.13 | <0.020 | na |
The source’s exposure calculation used package-recommended daily dose and a 70 kg adult body weight. It reports daily supplement-derived Asi intake in the range 0.00004-0.02 µg kgbw−1 d−1, potentially toxic As fraction (Astot-AB) intake in the range 0.00012-0.20 µg kgbw−1 d−1, and DMA intake in the range 0.00008-0.011 µg kgbw−1 d−1.
Selected source risk-screen outputs, reported here as source context rather than HMTc thresholds:
- The highest calculated Asi exposure, including background exposure, was
2.6%of the source’s acute MRL screen. - The highest calculated DMA exposure, including background dietary exposure, was
0.1%of the chronic MRL screen. - For Asi, the source concluded no concern for the general population across all collected supplements, while
8of33supplements were classified as of concern for the source’s sensitive-population screen. - For the
Astot-ABpotentially toxic fraction, the abstract states26 out of 33supplements showed no concern and7had potential health risk. The body text states24 out of 33 (= 79%)showed no concern and7had potential health risk; the percentage and complement align with 26/33, so the inconsistency is preserved rather than resolved here.
Methods (brief)
Thirty-three algae/cyanobacteria food supplements were purchased from local and online stores in Belgium during 2013-2016 and analyzed within six months after purchase. For each supplement, at least 10 tablets, capsules, or soft gels were homogenized; liquid supplements were homogenized by shaking, and dry formulations were ground before extraction or mineralisation. Soft-gel and capsule casings were separated from contents because of heterogeneity problems; for worst-case exposure calculations, the authors initially assumed casing concentrations equaled content concentrations.
Total As was determined by ICP-MS after acid digestion in PTFE vessels in a microwave oven. Arsenic species were extracted with 0.10 M HNO3 and 3% hydrogen peroxide, following a procedure similar to EN 16802:2016; this oxidizes As(III) to As(V), so Asi is measured as total inorganic arsenic without distinguishing oxidation state. Speciation was performed by HPLC-ICP-MS. The LOQ for Asi and DMA on the anion-exchange method was 0.020 mg kg−1, and the LOQ for AB on the cation-exchange method was 0.092 mg kg−1. CRMs included NMIJ 7405a hijiki seaweed, NMIJ 7532 brown rice flour, BCR 627 tuna fish, BCR 729 sea lettuce, and IRMM 804 rice flour.
Implications
This source provides a primary, sample-level occurrence dataset for algae and cyanobacteria supplements on an as-sold basis. It is especially important because it separates total arsenic from inorganic arsenic and DMA, and because the brown-algae/kelp subset shows higher total arsenic while individual samples vary substantially in inorganic arsenic. The page should not be used to infer brands or product rankings; the source anonymizes samples as FS1-FS33 and reports ingredient/species categories rather than brand-linked contaminant values.
Wiki pages this source may touch
- supplements-algae-seaweed-based
- dietary-supplements
- seaweed
- herbal-botanicals
- arsenic-total
- arsenic-inorganic
Verification notes
- Identity checks before writing found no existing source page for DOI
10.1080/19440049.2021.1877834, raw handleMFK_cheyns2021, title text, or cite keycheyns2021-algae-cyanobacteria-supplements-arsenic. - All sample-level concentration values in the Key numbers table were rechecked against
/tmp/hmi-seaweed-032.txt, extracted withpdftotext -layout. The rows are copied from Table 1 in source order;naand<censoring markers are preserved. - Units are preserved as the source reports them: Table 1 concentrations are
µg g−1, abstract and text ranges usemg/kgormg kg−1, and exposure values useµg kgbw−1 d−1. No unit conversion was performed. - Speciation check:
Astotis recorded as total arsenic;Asiis the source’s measured inorganic arsenic fraction after extraction/oxidation; DMA and AB are not collapsed into total or inorganic arsenic. TheAstot-ABmetric is the source’s potentially toxic fraction, not a measured inorganic-arsenic value. - Brand firewall: the page retains only anonymized source sample IDs (FS1-FS33) and species/formulation categories; no brand names or retailer names are attached to values.
- Missing-slug note: the taxonomy snapshot has no exact ingredient slugs for
Chlorella,Spirulina,cyanobacteria,Ascophyllum,Fucus,Macrocystis, orLithothamnium. Frontmatter uses broad existingseaweed,herbal-botanicals,supplements-algae-seaweed-based, anddietary-supplementsslugs; exact organism names remain in source text.
Page history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.
| Commit | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 4039d20 | 2026-06-10 | scope: broaden ingest to the full upstream+downstream literature (marine, atmospheric, attribution, exposure, toxicology) — inclusion is the default |