Herbal botanicals in the HMI library has 502 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Ba, Mo, Sr and Tl from 28 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsToxicology ReportsRead source →3Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportRead source →4Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source →5Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →6Heavy metals in aromatic spices by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometryFood Additives & Contaminants: Part BRead source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid and total mercury and others, in 502 results from 28 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsToxicology ReportsRead source →3Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportRead source →4Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source →
-
Main drivers:
Herbal botanicals, as sold from grown independently had total mercury higher at 14.2 µg/kg, against 9.39 µg/kg for all samples in the same study.7The Mercury Concentration in Spice PlantsProcessesRead source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsToxicology ReportsRead source →3Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportRead source →4Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source →
Herbal botanicals overview
Herbal botanicals in the HMI library has 502 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Ba, Mo, Sr and Tl from 28 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsToxicology ReportsRead source →3Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportRead source →4Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source →5Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →6Heavy metals in aromatic spices by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometryFood Additives & Contaminants: Part BRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in herbal botanicals, as sold from 1,791 results in 5 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.2 to 1,690 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, GEMS/Food gave subgroup medians from 9 to 400 µg/kg from 1,056 results.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 60 µg/kg (Shchukin et al. 2022) to 2,570 µg/kg (Shchukin et al. 2022).4Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source → For cadmium, 6 studies on a dry-weight basis reported means and medians from 30 µg/kg (Falahati et al. 2025) to 430 µg/kg (Özden 2021).8Health risk assessment of Pb, Cd, and Zn in leafy and bulb vegetables from northern Iran using Monte Carlo simulationEnvironmental Research Communications 7 (2025) 065030Read source →9Assessment of toxic metals in commonly used herbs and spices in Turkeyİstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 51(3): 392-397Read source → Higher results came from contaminated or exposed settings rather than ordinary supply. Herbal botanicals, as sold from grown independently had total mercury higher at 14.2 µg/kg, against 9.39 µg/kg for all samples in the same study.7The Mercury Concentration in Spice PlantsProcessesRead source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the herbal botanicals came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as herbal botanicals
This page covers herbal botanicals in 5 forms kept separate in every comparison: herbal botanicals, as sold (425 results), herbal botanicals, oil (49 results), herbal botanicals, powder or ground (15 results), herbal botanicals, dried (7 results) and herbal botanicals, flour or meal (6 results).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsToxicology ReportsRead source →3Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportRead source →4Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source →5Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →6Heavy metals in aromatic spices by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometryFood Additives & Contaminants: Part BRead source →
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of herbal botanicals
The table holds every extracted herbal botanicals result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 502 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsToxicology ReportsRead source →3Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportRead source →4Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source →5Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →6Heavy metals in aromatic spices by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometryFood Additives & Contaminants: Part BRead source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
149 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 136 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 4 values from 3 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.6Heavy metals in aromatic spices by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometryFood Additives & Contaminants: Part BRead source →10Assessment of Heavy Metals Concentration and Health Risks of Selected Vegetables Sold In Jos MetropolisArchives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study 4(5)Read source →11Evaluation of heavy metals in herbal plants growing in Singrauli Region of Madhya PradeshInternational Journal of Chemical and Biological SciencesRead source →
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of herbal botanicals, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 85 findings from 21 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
502 of 502 findings · 20 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
74 findings · 18 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2018 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2016 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2021 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2023 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017–2022 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2017 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2022 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006–2019 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019–2020 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2016 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013–2014 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2016–2018 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2012–2018 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2012 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2018 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2009 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2021 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005–2014 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019 | all samples2018 | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAngelon-Gaetz et al. 2018 | home investigations for children with elevated blood lead2011–2018 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2014–2018Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2017Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016–2020Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2017Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2018Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2021Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2021Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020 | Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016 | origin India, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016 | origin Japan, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldFalahati et al. 2025 | vegetable farms in four agricultural regions, Babol, MazandaranCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025 | Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016 | all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMehari et al. 2015 | Greensboro grocery store, single productCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldOladoye et al. 2016 | natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-22015Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023 | Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2018–2020Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2023Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC3, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC4, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP3, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldOsei-Safo et al. 2024 | ginger (Ghana), 3 Accra markets pooledCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSabri et al. 2025 | greater Casablanca markets2025Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019 | all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilAngelon-Gaetz et al. 2018 | home investigations for children with elevated blood lead2011–2018 | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-8; origin Ghana, Central marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-9; origin Ghana, Asafo marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-10; origin Ghana, Railway marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, driedDghaim et al. 2015 | all samples (local and imported)Collection date unreportedDry weight | range. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, driedÖzden 2021 | unpackaged samples, local markets, IstanbulCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, flour or mealWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, flour or mealWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2007 | median. | ||
56 findings · 17 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2014–2019 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2018 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2006 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2017 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006–2019 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2007 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2021 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019 | all samples2018 | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2019Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2019Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2017Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020 | Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016 | origin India, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016 | origin Japan, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldFalahati et al. 2025 | vegetable farms in four agricultural regions, Babol, MazandaranCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025 | Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016 | all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldOladoye et al. 2016 | natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-22015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023 | Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC3, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC4, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP3, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldOsei-Safo et al. 2024 | ginger (Ghana), 3 Accra markets pooledCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSabri et al. 2025 | greater Casablanca markets2025Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019 | all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-8; origin Ghana, Central marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-9; origin Ghana, Asafo marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-10; origin Ghana, Railway marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, driedDghaim et al. 2015 | all samples (local and imported)Collection date unreportedDry weight | range. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, driedÖzden 2021 | unpackaged samples, local markets, IstanbulCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, flour or mealWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2019 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, flour or mealWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2006 | median. | ||
36 findings · 10 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2022 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2002–2017 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2023 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000–2017 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2022 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2012–2022 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019–2021 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2021 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005–2014 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAdeniyi et al. 2021 | Composite of purchases from 3 traders in each of 5 Jos marketsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020 | Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016 | origin India, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016 | origin Japan, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025 | Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC3, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC4, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP3, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldOsei-Safo et al. 2024 | ginger (Ghana), 3 Accra markets pooledCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSabri et al. 2025 | greater Casablanca markets2025Basis not stated | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, flour or mealWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2015 | median. | ||
7 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019–2022 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2022 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2022 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
32 findings · 7 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006–2016 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2016 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2017 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008–2015 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2021 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016 | origin India, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016 | origin Japan, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldFischer et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldFischer et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldFischer et al. 2022 | commercial packagesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldFischer et al. 2022 | grown independentlyCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016 | all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC3, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC4, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP3, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, flour or mealWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006–2016 | median. | ||
25 findings · 10 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019 | all samples2018 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020 | Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025 | Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016 | all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023 | Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSabri et al. 2025 | greater Casablanca markets2025Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019 | all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
32 findings · 12 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2021 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019 | all samples2018 | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJurowski et al. 2022 | all 10 Polish pharmacy peppermint tincture products2022 | min. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJurowski et al. 2022 | all 10 Polish pharmacy peppermint tincture products2022 | max. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJurowski et al. 2022 | Polish pharmacy OTC tincture, product code B2022 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJurowski et al. 2022 | Polish pharmacy OTC tincture, product code C2022 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJurowski et al. 2022 | Polish pharmacy OTC tincture, product code F2022 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJurowski et al. 2022 | Polish pharmacy OTC tincture, product code G2022 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020 | Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025 | Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016 | all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023 | Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSabri et al. 2025 | greater Casablanca markets2025Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019 | all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
12 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019 | all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2021 | median. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005 | median. | ||
12 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020 | Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016 | all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019 | all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
29 findings · 11 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019 | all samples2018 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAdeniyi et al. 2021 | Composite of purchases from 3 traders in each of 5 Jos marketsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020 | Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025 | Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016 | all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldOladoye et al. 2016 | natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-22015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023 | Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC3, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC4, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP3, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019 | all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-8; origin Ghana, Central marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-9; origin Ghana, Asafo marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-10; origin Ghana, Railway marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, driedDghaim et al. 2015 | all samples (local and imported)Collection date unreportedDry weight | range. | ||
29 findings · 11 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019 | all samples2018 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020 | Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025 | Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016 | all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldOladoye et al. 2016 | natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-22015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023 | Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC3, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MC4, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020 | MP3, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldOsei-Safo et al. 2024 | ginger (Ghana), 3 Accra markets pooledCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019 | all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-8; origin Ghana, Central marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-9; origin Ghana, Asafo marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-10; origin Ghana, Railway marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, driedDghaim et al. 2015 | all samples (local and imported)Collection date unreportedDry weight | range. | ||
18 findings · 6 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019 | all samples2018 | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020 | Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016 | all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019 | all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
20 findings · 8 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020 | Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldFalahati et al. 2025 | vegetable farms in four agricultural regions, Babol, MazandaranCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016 | all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023 | Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldOsei-Safo et al. 2024 | ginger (Ghana), 3 Accra markets pooledCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019 | all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-8; origin Ghana, Central marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-9; origin Ghana, Asafo marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014 | UM-10; origin Ghana, Railway marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, driedDghaim et al. 2015 | all samples (local and imported)Collection date unreportedDry weight | range. | ||
9 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
11 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020 | Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019 | all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
9 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
9 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022 | Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022 | peppermint oil 3Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019 | all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 12.4–18.3 (bounded) | 101–139 (bounded) | 350–355 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 12.2–15.5 (bounded) | 50–76 (bounded) | 350–353 (bounded) |
78 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 78 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-bc1b5cfe5dcd:a46feaceae56
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1000 | 7800 | 20500 |
| Alternative weighting | 1000 | 7800 | 20500 |
18 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 15 | 25% |
| Assaad et al. 2020 | 1 | 25% |
| Mehari et al. 2015 | 1 | 25% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 1 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-147594e71e08:4c62fe63fef5
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, basis not stated
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, basis not stated. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Basis not stated by the source, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 155 | 560 | 950 |
| Alternative weighting | 155 | 560 | 950 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a basis not stated by the source basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-8dd7210b9208:3a8774298556
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, oil
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, oil. Herbal botanicals, oil; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 8200 | 8200 | 8200 |
| Alternative weighting | 8200 | 8200 | 8200 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Angelon-Gaetz et al. 2018 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, oil on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Angelon-Gaetz et al. 2018 is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, oil on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-065a3ac020f3:d5075d5ccd03
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal. Herbal botanicals, flour or meal; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 133 | 276 | 302 |
| Alternative weighting | 133 | 276 | 302 |
12 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 12 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-6f3d40aa051e:9244bc918bd7
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 13.5–14.3 (bounded) | 32 | 155 |
| Alternative weighting | 14.3–16 (bounded) | 29 | 130 |
55 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 55 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-3e9bda2d2c69:f6410a26d1bc
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 200 | 300 | 850 |
| Alternative weighting | 200 | 300 | 850 |
11 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 7 | 25% |
| Assaad et al. 2020 | 1 | 25% |
| Oladoye et al. 2016 | 1 | 25% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 2 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-31836e8d2025:700ac5fafda8
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, powder or ground, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Darko et al. 2014 | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Darko et al. 2014 is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, powder or ground on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-1f001645f1f2:2d70d0351225
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal. Herbal botanicals, flour or meal; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 12.1–13 (bounded) | 25 | 37.5 |
| Alternative weighting | 12.1–13 (bounded) | 25 | 37.5 |
10 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 10 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-b0fbba9dbd61:22c4adbe7f23
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals tAs reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals tAs reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤44.4 | 11–100 (bounded) | 115–250 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤44.4 | 8.85–100 (bounded) | 200–330 (bounded) |
41 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 41 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-518fdf402f8f:dfc416588f3a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals tAs reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals tAs reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 6200 | 6200 | 6200 |
| Alternative weighting | 6200 | 6200 | 6200 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Assaad et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Assaad et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-9734e71c15bf:4b2e7d490cbb
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals tAs reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals tAs reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal. Herbal botanicals, flour or meal; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.48 | 50–65.2 (bounded) | 100–130 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.48 | 50–65.2 (bounded) | 100–130 (bounded) |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-d2f63ae4d2b2:3fb89d83dcd3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals iAs reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals iAs reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | 25–40 (bounded) | 40–45 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | 25–40 (bounded) | 40–45 (bounded) |
5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 5 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-3ba1ee26af57:dc95225005a6
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals DMA reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals DMA reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-13e13b35adf0:5f2234de8d52
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals tHg reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals tHg reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤2.25 | ≤5.4 | 4–16.8 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤2 | ≤6.5 | 1.8–37.5 (bounded) |
20 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 20 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-4f82551fb02c:a94e5deec2c2
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals tHg reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals tHg reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 9.58 | 9.58 | 9.58 |
| Alternative weighting | 9.58 | 9.58 | 9.58 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Fischer et al. 2022 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Fischer et al. 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-8eb2acd50f08:62943cbcfb47
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals tHg reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals tHg reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal. Herbal botanicals, flour or meal; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 7.5 | 11.7 | 18–19 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 7.5 | 11.7 | 18–19 (bounded) |
6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 6 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-938a95915274:2452271b3e66
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Ni reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Ni reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 4500 | 34000 | 62600 |
| Alternative weighting | 4500 | 34000 | 62600 |
4 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Assaad et al. 2020 | 1 | 50% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 3 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-18a0eab448fb:7baf9a2e560d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Cr reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Cr reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1270 | 1270 | 1270 |
| Alternative weighting | 1270 | 1270 | 1270 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-5ff0f5567689:f916b8f335aa
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Cr reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Cr reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1800 | 3950 | 4700 |
| Alternative weighting | 1800 | 3950 | 4700 |
5 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Assaad et al. 2020 | 1 | 50% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 4 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-6d61b34d2518:6660361b1250
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Sn reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Sn reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤100 | 50–115 (bounded) | 100–130 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤100 | 50–115 (bounded) | 100–130 (bounded) |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-8c5e4a4bdf93:79b2330f4cd1
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Co reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Co reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 50300 | 50300 | 50300 |
| Alternative weighting | 50300 | 50300 | 50300 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Assaad et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Assaad et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-0f847fcf1eb5:abaefe91ac28
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Cu reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Cu reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2200 | 5100 | 5300 |
| Alternative weighting | 2200 | 5100 | 5300 |
6 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Assaad et al. 2020 | 1 | 33% |
| Oladoye et al. 2016 | 1 | 33% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 4 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-393542d615de:ee32a7a76b93
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Fe reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Fe reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2200 | 107000 | 211000 |
| Alternative weighting | 2200 | 107000 | 211000 |
6 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Assaad et al. 2020 | 1 | 33% |
| Oladoye et al. 2016 | 1 | 33% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 4 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-a6047af07641:b8ecf6390db5
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Mn reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Mn reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 306000 | 805000 | 805000 |
| Alternative weighting | 306000 | 805000 | 805000 |
5 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Assaad et al. 2020 | 1 | 50% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 4 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-4795483a986e:7d7bcced1f0e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Zn reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Zn reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 38200 | 98400 | 125000 |
| Alternative weighting | 38200 | 98400 | 125000 |
5 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Assaad et al. 2020 | 1 | 50% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 4 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-0d00c2131522:296fdcd26b02
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI herbal botanicals Ba reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI herbal botanicals Ba reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 94700 | 94700 | 94700 |
| Alternative weighting | 94700 | 94700 | 94700 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Assaad et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Assaad et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-d6c0bd5e8b03:e7f03d2b89df
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The value could not be reconciled with its own paper, so it is shown but not compared.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
No medians or sample values exist for this form and metal, so no HMI reference could be built.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
Reporting limits overlap the study comparison, so no direction can be shown.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach herbal botanicals
The evidence on how metals reach herbal botanicals comes from studies that compared exposed and ordinary settings. Herbal botanicals, as sold from grown independently had total mercury higher at 14.2 µg/kg, against 9.39 µg/kg for all samples in the same study.7The Mercury Concentration in Spice PlantsProcessesRead source →
These are observational comparisons from single studies; the size of the difference depends on the site, metal and distance.
Which forms and regions measured lower
For lead, the HMI reference median was lowest for herbal botanicals, flour or meal (276 µg/kg) and highest for herbal botanicals, as sold (7,800 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →5Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →12Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source →13Heavy metal concentration in commonly sold stem vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskDhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 2021, 30(2): 221-232Read source → The HMI reference for lead in herbal botanicals, as sold pools 18 subgroup units from 4 sampling families, with a median of 7,800 µg/kg and a middle half spanning 1,000 (lower quartile) and 20,500 µg/kg (upper quartile).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →5Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →12Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source →13Heavy metal concentration in commonly sold stem vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskDhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 2021, 30(2): 221-232Read source → For lead in herbal botanicals, as sold, the reference median was between 101 and 139 µg/kg, with a middle half from between 12.4 and 18.3 to between 350 and 355 µg/kg across 78 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For lead in herbal botanicals, flour or meal, the reference median was 276 µg/kg, with a middle half from 133 to 302 µg/kg across 12 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, herbal botanicals, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.2 µg/kg) and the highest in SEARO (1,690 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in PAHO (13.5 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (250 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Targeted herbal botanicals, as sold samples in SEARO had lead higher at 420 µg/kg, against 374 µg/kg for SEARO in the same study.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In another study, targeted herbal botanicals, as sold samples in EURO had cadmium higher at 400 µg/kg, against 57 µg/kg for EURO in the same study.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
In one study, lead across 12 groups of herbal botanicals ranged from 2.2 µg/kg (PAHO) to 800 µg/kg (SEARO); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In another study, lead across 8 groups of herbal botanicals ranged from 80 µg/kg (peppermint tincture 1) to 2,570 µg/kg (commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lot); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.4Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
Processed or prepared forms were compared only with unprocessed herbal botanicals in the same study and group. Herbal botanicals, flour or meal (EURO) had lead lower at 233 µg/kg, against 338 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (herbal botanicals, as sold).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Forms differ in water content, so a per-kilogram difference is not by itself a measured removal or gain of metal.
Mitigation for herbal botanicals
Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.
No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Avoiding exposed growing areas lowered the metal measured in the studies available, but no study measured the cost or supply effect of doing so.7The Mercury Concentration in Spice PlantsProcessesRead source → Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing herbal botanicals for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 1 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 1,300 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 1.2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 100 µg/kg (Dghaim et al. 2015), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →14Determination of Heavy Metals Concentration in Traditional Herbs Commonly Consumed in the United Arab EmiratesJournal of Environmental and Public HealthRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 25 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 1,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying herbal botanicals
No maximum level for metals in herbal botanicals was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from herbal botanicals
No source in the library converted herbal botanicals concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names herbal botanicals was decided on its content: 28 occurrence extracted, 28 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Herbal botanicals FAQs
What heavy metals are found in herbal botanicals?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Ba, Mo, Sr and Tl in herbal botanicals, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsToxicology ReportsRead source →3Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportRead source →4Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in herbal botanicals, as sold from 1,791 results in 5 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.2 to 1,690 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How do heavy metals get into herbal botanicals?
In the studies available, herbal botanicals from contaminated or exposed settings carried more metal than herbal botanicals from the same study’s control.7The Mercury Concentration in Spice PlantsProcessesRead source → Herbal botanicals, as sold from grown independently had total mercury higher at 14.2 µg/kg, against 9.39 µg/kg for all samples in the same study.7The Mercury Concentration in Spice PlantsProcessesRead source →
Which types of herbal botanicals have the lowest levels?
For lead, the HMI reference median was lowest for herbal botanicals, flour or meal (276 µg/kg) and highest for herbal botanicals, as sold (7,800 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →5Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →12Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source →13Heavy metal concentration in commonly sold stem vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskDhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 2021, 30(2): 221-232Read source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in herbal botanicals?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, herbal botanicals, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.2 µg/kg) and the highest in SEARO (1,690 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in PAHO (13.5 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (250 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Does processing change heavy metals in herbal botanicals?
Only comparisons between forms in the same study are available, not before-and-after measurements of the same herbal botanicals.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Herbal botanicals, flour or meal (EURO) had lead lower at 233 µg/kg, against 338 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (herbal botanicals, as sold).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How much of the arsenic in herbal botanicals is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 7 results from 2 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →15Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source → European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 reported inorganic arsenic at 260 µg/kg (mean) in herbal botanicals, as sold from European dietary-survey occurrence data.15Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsPeer-reviewed
- Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018Government
- Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsPeer-reviewed
- Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladPeer-reviewed
- Heavy metals in aromatic spices by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometryPeer-reviewed
- The Mercury Concentration in Spice PlantsPeer-reviewed
- Health risk assessment of Pb, Cd, and Zn in leafy and bulb vegetables from northern Iran using Monte Carlo simulationPeer-reviewed
- Assessment of toxic metals in commonly used herbs and spices in TurkeyPeer-reviewed
- Assessment of Heavy Metals Concentration and Health Risks of Selected Vegetables Sold In Jos MetropolisPeer-reviewed
- Evaluation of heavy metals in herbal plants growing in Singrauli Region of Madhya PradeshPeer-reviewed
- Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAPeer-reviewed
- Heavy metal concentration in commonly sold stem vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskPeer-reviewed
- Determination of Heavy Metals Concentration in Traditional Herbs Commonly Consumed in the United Arab EmiratesPeer-reviewed
- Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationGovernment
Sources
Browse Herbal botanicals Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every herbal botanicals record in the library: 28 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.
