Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index
Fresh leafy herbs and delicate dill sprigs beside dishes of dried herbs and slender brown spice seeds illustrating herbal botanicals ingredient context.

Heavy metals in Herbal botanicals

Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic and total mercury in herbal botanicals: monitoring results, studies, references by form and basis, limits, testing and controls.

Quick read

Herbal botanicals in the HMI library has 502 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Ba, Mo, Sr and Tl from 28 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2G. N. Abdel-Rahman, Mohamed B. M. Ahmed, Bassem A. Sabry, Safaa S. M. Ali · 2019Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsToxicology ReportsRead source →3Angelon-Gaetz KA, Klaus C, Chaudhry EA, Bean DK · 2018Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportRead source →4Shchukin VM, Blinkova EA, Kuzmina NE, Luttseva AI · 2022Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source →5Assaad N, Fadel D, Argyraki A, Kypritidou Z, Bakir A, Awad E · 2020Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →6Bua DG, Annuario G, Albergamo A, Cicero N, Dugo G · 2016Heavy metals in aromatic spices by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometryFood Additives & Contaminants: Part BRead source →

Herbal botanicals overview

Herbal botanicals in the HMI library has 502 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Ba, Mo, Sr and Tl from 28 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2G. N. Abdel-Rahman, Mohamed B. M. Ahmed, Bassem A. Sabry, Safaa S. M. Ali · 2019Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsToxicology ReportsRead source →3Angelon-Gaetz KA, Klaus C, Chaudhry EA, Bean DK · 2018Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportRead source →4Shchukin VM, Blinkova EA, Kuzmina NE, Luttseva AI · 2022Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source →5Assaad N, Fadel D, Argyraki A, Kypritidou Z, Bakir A, Awad E · 2020Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →6Bua DG, Annuario G, Albergamo A, Cicero N, Dugo G · 2016Heavy metals in aromatic spices by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometryFood Additives & Contaminants: Part BRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in herbal botanicals, as sold from 1,791 results in 5 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.2 to 1,690 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, GEMS/Food gave subgroup medians from 9 to 400 µg/kg from 1,056 results.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 60 µg/kg (Shchukin et al. 2022) to 2,570 µg/kg (Shchukin et al. 2022).4Shchukin VM, Blinkova EA, Kuzmina NE, Luttseva AI · 2022Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source → For cadmium, 6 studies on a dry-weight basis reported means and medians from 30 µg/kg (Falahati et al. 2025) to 430 µg/kg (Özden 2021).8Falahati Naghibi E, Mehdinia SM, Amouei A · 2025Health risk assessment of Pb, Cd, and Zn in leafy and bulb vegetables from northern Iran using Monte Carlo simulationEnvironmental Research Communications 7 (2025) 065030Read source →9Özden H · 2021Assessment of toxic metals in commonly used herbs and spices in Turkeyİstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 51(3): 392-397Read source → Higher results came from contaminated or exposed settings rather than ordinary supply. Herbal botanicals, as sold from grown independently had total mercury higher at 14.2 µg/kg, against 9.39 µg/kg for all samples in the same study.7Fischer A, Brodziak-Dopierała B · 2022The Mercury Concentration in Spice PlantsProcessesRead source →

For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the herbal botanicals came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.

What counts as herbal botanicals

This page covers herbal botanicals in 5 forms kept separate in every comparison: herbal botanicals, as sold (425 results), herbal botanicals, oil (49 results), herbal botanicals, powder or ground (15 results), herbal botanicals, dried (7 results) and herbal botanicals, flour or meal (6 results).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2G. N. Abdel-Rahman, Mohamed B. M. Ahmed, Bassem A. Sabry, Safaa S. M. Ali · 2019Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsToxicology ReportsRead source →3Angelon-Gaetz KA, Klaus C, Chaudhry EA, Bean DK · 2018Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportRead source →4Shchukin VM, Blinkova EA, Kuzmina NE, Luttseva AI · 2022Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source →5Assaad N, Fadel D, Argyraki A, Kypritidou Z, Bakir A, Awad E · 2020Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →6Bua DG, Annuario G, Albergamo A, Cicero N, Dugo G · 2016Heavy metals in aromatic spices by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometryFood Additives & Contaminants: Part BRead source →

Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.

Heavy metal contamination profile of herbal botanicals

The table holds every extracted herbal botanicals result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 502 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2G. N. Abdel-Rahman, Mohamed B. M. Ahmed, Bassem A. Sabry, Safaa S. M. Ali · 2019Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsToxicology ReportsRead source →3Angelon-Gaetz KA, Klaus C, Chaudhry EA, Bean DK · 2018Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportRead source →4Shchukin VM, Blinkova EA, Kuzmina NE, Luttseva AI · 2022Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source →5Assaad N, Fadel D, Argyraki A, Kypritidou Z, Bakir A, Awad E · 2020Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →6Bua DG, Annuario G, Albergamo A, Cicero N, Dugo G · 2016Heavy metals in aromatic spices by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometryFood Additives & Contaminants: Part BRead source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

149 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 136 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 4 values from 3 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.6Bua DG, Annuario G, Albergamo A, Cicero N, Dugo G · 2016Heavy metals in aromatic spices by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometryFood Additives & Contaminants: Part BRead source →10Adeniyi O, Bayo D, Adeniyi A, Okeke-Agulu K · 2021Assessment of Heavy Metals Concentration and Health Risks of Selected Vegetables Sold In Jos MetropolisArchives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study 4(5)Read source →11Sarita Patel, Manisha Pradhan, Ashish Patel · 2023Evaluation of heavy metals in herbal plants growing in Singrauli Region of Madhya PradeshInternational Journal of Chemical and Biological SciencesRead source →

Comparison methods and scope

Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of herbal botanicals, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.

About this table
Food formCollection scopeFindingComparisonEvidence
Herbal botanicals findings from monitoring programmes, total diet studies and every extracted field, market and contaminated-site study, in µg/kg with each source’s form, basis, statistic and censoring retained.
Food formCollection scopeFinding (µg/kg)ComparisonEvidence
74 findings · 18 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2018median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2016median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2021median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2018median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2023median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017–2022median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2017median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2014–2022median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2014–2020median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2006–2019median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2011median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019–2020median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2011median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014–2016median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013–2014median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2016–2018median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2012–2018median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2012median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2018median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2009median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2021median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005–2014median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019all samples2018not detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAngelon-Gaetz et al. 2018home investigations for children with elevated blood lead2011–2018mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEMRO2014–2018Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2015–2017Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2016Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2016–2020Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2017Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2018Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2021Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2021Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2024Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2024Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016origin India, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016origin Japan, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldFalahati et al. 2025vegetable farms in four agricultural regions, Babol, MazandaranCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMehari et al. 2015Greensboro grocery store, single productCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldOladoye et al. 2016natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-22015Dry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2018–2020Basis not statedmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2023Basis not statedmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC3, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC4, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP3, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldOsei-Safo et al. 2024ginger (Ghana), 3 Accra markets pooledCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSabri et al. 2025greater Casablanca markets2025Basis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
4 findings · 2 studies
Herbal botanicals, oilAngelon-Gaetz et al. 2018home investigations for children with elevated blood lead2011–2018sample value.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportedmean.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-8; origin Ghana, Central marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-9; origin Ghana, Asafo marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-10; origin Ghana, Railway marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 2 studies
Herbal botanicals, driedDghaim et al. 2015all samples (local and imported)Collection date unreportedDry weightrange.
Herbal botanicals, driedÖzden 2021unpackaged samples, local markets, IstanbulCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, flour or mealWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2019median.
Herbal botanicals, flour or mealWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2007median.
56 findings · 17 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEMRO2014–2019median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2018median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2006median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2019median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2006median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2017median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2006–2019median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2007median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2021median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019all samples2018not detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEMRO2019Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2015–2019Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2017Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2024Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2024Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016origin India, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016origin Japan, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldFalahati et al. 2025vegetable farms in four agricultural regions, Babol, MazandaranCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldOladoye et al. 2016natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-22015Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC3, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC4, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP3, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldOsei-Safo et al. 2024ginger (Ghana), 3 Accra markets pooledCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSabri et al. 2025greater Casablanca markets2025Basis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportednot detected.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-8; origin Ghana, Central marketCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-9; origin Ghana, Asafo marketCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-10; origin Ghana, Railway marketCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
2 findings · 2 studies
Herbal botanicals, driedDghaim et al. 2015all samples (local and imported)Collection date unreportedDry weightrange.
Herbal botanicals, driedÖzden 2021unpackaged samples, local markets, IstanbulCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, flour or mealWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2019median.
Herbal botanicals, flour or mealWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2006median.
36 findings · 10 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2022median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2002–2017median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2014–2023median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000–2017median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2014–2022median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2014–2020median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2012–2022median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2019–2021median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2021median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005–2014median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2024Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2024Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAdeniyi et al. 2021Composite of purchases from 3 traders in each of 5 Jos marketsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016origin India, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016origin Japan, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC3, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC4, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP3, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldOsei-Safo et al. 2024ginger (Ghana), 3 Accra markets pooledCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSabri et al. 2025greater Casablanca markets2025Basis not statedmean.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportednot detected.
1 finding · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, flour or mealWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2014–2015median.
7 findings · 2 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2019–2022median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2018median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2022median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not statedmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2022median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017median.
32 findings · 7 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2006–2016median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2016median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2015–2017median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2008–2015median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2021median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2024Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2024Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016origin India, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldBua et al. 2016origin Japan, Italian retailCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldFischer et al. 2022all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldFischer et al. 2022all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldFischer et al. 2022commercial packagesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldFischer et al. 2022grown independentlyCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC3, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC4, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP3, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportednot detected.
1 finding · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, flour or mealWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2006–2016median.
25 findings · 10 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019all samples2018mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSabri et al. 2025greater Casablanca markets2025Basis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportednot detected.
32 findings · 12 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2021median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019all samples2018not detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJurowski et al. 2022all 10 Polish pharmacy peppermint tincture products2022min.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJurowski et al. 2022all 10 Polish pharmacy peppermint tincture products2022max.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJurowski et al. 2022Polish pharmacy OTC tincture, product code B2022mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJurowski et al. 2022Polish pharmacy OTC tincture, product code C2022mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJurowski et al. 2022Polish pharmacy OTC tincture, product code F2022mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJurowski et al. 2022Polish pharmacy OTC tincture, product code G2022mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSabri et al. 2025greater Casablanca markets2025Basis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportedmean.
12 findings · 3 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2024Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2024Dry weightmedian.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportedmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2021median.
Herbal botanicals, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005median.
12 findings · 4 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportednot detected.
29 findings · 11 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019all samples2018mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAdeniyi et al. 2021Composite of purchases from 3 traders in each of 5 Jos marketsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldOladoye et al. 2016natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-22015Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC3, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC4, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP3, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportedmean.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-8; origin Ghana, Central marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-9; origin Ghana, Asafo marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-10; origin Ghana, Railway marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, driedDghaim et al. 2015all samples (local and imported)Collection date unreportedDry weightrange.
29 findings · 11 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019all samples2018mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldJoseph et al. 2025Gobbiya Dam irrigated farmCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldOladoye et al. 2016natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-22015Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC3, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MC4, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP1, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP2, packaged/purchased sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMarinescu et al. 2020MP3, wild-collected (spontaneous flora, Galati County)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldOsei-Safo et al. 2024ginger (Ghana), 3 Accra markets pooledCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportednot detected.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-8; origin Ghana, Central marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-9; origin Ghana, Asafo marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-10; origin Ghana, Railway marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, driedDghaim et al. 2015all samples (local and imported)Collection date unreportedDry weightrange.
18 findings · 6 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldAbdel-Rahman et al. 2019all samples2018mean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportednot detected.
20 findings · 8 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldFalahati et al. 2025vegetable farms in four agricultural regions, Babol, MazandaranCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldMatloob 2016all samples (5 samples per spice, Babil shops)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldPatel et al. 2023Singrauli region (all samples)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, mean of 4 phases over 2 monthsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 1Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 2Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 3Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSultana et al. 2021Kawran Bazar market, Dhaka, sampling phase 4Collection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldOsei-Safo et al. 2024ginger (Ghana), 3 Accra markets pooledCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportedmean.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-8; origin Ghana, Central marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-9; origin Ghana, Asafo marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Herbal botanicals, powder or groundDarko et al. 2014UM-10; origin Ghana, Railway marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, driedDghaim et al. 2015all samples (local and imported)Collection date unreportedDry weightrange.
9 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportedmean.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportednot detected.
11 findings · 3 studies
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldAssaad et al. 2020Akkar (site C), communal allotment, spring 20182018Dry weightsample value.
Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportedmean.
9 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportedmean.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportednot detected.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportednot detected.
9 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Abramtsevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2019 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lotCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022commercial herbal drug 4Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Konobeevo, Moscow regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022peppermint tincture 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, as soldShchukin et al. 2022Vol'sk, Saratov regionCollection date unreportedmean.
3 findings · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Herbal botanicals, oilShchukin et al. 2022peppermint oil 3Collection date unreportedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Herbal botanicals, as soldSavić et al. 2019all samples (single market sample)Collection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Shared dataset methods and interpretation

Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.

HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference12.4–18.3 (bounded)101–139 (bounded)350–355 (bounded)
Alternative weighting12.2–15.5 (bounded)50–76 (bounded)350–353 (bounded)

78 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food78100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-bc1b5cfe5dcd:a46feaceae56

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference1000780020500
Alternative weighting1000780020500

18 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food1525%
Assaad et al. 2020125%
Mehari et al. 2015125%
Sultana et al. 2021125%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-147594e71e08:4c62fe63fef5

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, basis not stated

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, basis not stated. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Basis not stated by the source, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference155560950
Alternative weighting155560950

3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food3100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a basis not stated by the source basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-8dd7210b9208:3a8774298556

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, oil

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, oil. Herbal botanicals, oil; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference820082008200
Alternative weighting820082008200

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Angelon-Gaetz et al. 20181100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, oil on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Angelon-Gaetz et al. 2018 is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, oil on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-065a3ac020f3:d5075d5ccd03

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Pb reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal. Herbal botanicals, flour or meal; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference133276302
Alternative weighting133276302

12 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food12100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-6f3d40aa051e:9244bc918bd7

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference13.5–14.3 (bounded)32155
Alternative weighting14.3–16 (bounded)29130

55 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food55100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-3e9bda2d2c69:f6410a26d1bc

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference200300850
Alternative weighting200300850

11 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food725%
Assaad et al. 2020125%
Oladoye et al. 2016125%
Sultana et al. 2021225%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-31836e8d2025:700ac5fafda8

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, powder or ground, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, powder or ground, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤10≤10≤10
Alternative weighting≤10≤10≤10

3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Darko et al. 20143100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Darko et al. 2014 is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, powder or ground on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-1f001645f1f2:2d70d0351225

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Cd reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal. Herbal botanicals, flour or meal; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference12.1–13 (bounded)2537.5
Alternative weighting12.1–13 (bounded)2537.5

10 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food10100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-b0fbba9dbd61:22c4adbe7f23

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals tAs reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals tAs reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤44.411–100 (bounded)115–250 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤44.48.85–100 (bounded)200–330 (bounded)

41 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food41100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-518fdf402f8f:dfc416588f3a

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals tAs reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals tAs reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference620062006200
Alternative weighting620062006200

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Assaad et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Assaad et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-9734e71c15bf:4b2e7d490cbb

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals tAs reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals tAs reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal. Herbal botanicals, flour or meal; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤0.4850–65.2 (bounded)100–130 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤0.4850–65.2 (bounded)100–130 (bounded)

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-d2f63ae4d2b2:3fb89d83dcd3

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals iAs reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals iAs reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤2025–40 (bounded)40–45 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤2025–40 (bounded)40–45 (bounded)

5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food5100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-3ba1ee26af57:dc95225005a6

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals DMA reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals DMA reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤20≤20≤20
Alternative weighting≤20≤20≤20

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-13e13b35adf0:5f2234de8d52

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals tHg reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals tHg reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤2.25≤5.44–16.8 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤2≤6.51.8–37.5 (bounded)

20 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food20100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-4f82551fb02c:a94e5deec2c2

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals tHg reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals tHg reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference9.589.589.58
Alternative weighting9.589.589.58

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Fischer et al. 20221100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Fischer et al. 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-8eb2acd50f08:62943cbcfb47

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals tHg reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals tHg reference · Herbal botanicals, flour or meal. Herbal botanicals, flour or meal; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference7.511.718–19 (bounded)
Alternative weighting7.511.718–19 (bounded)

6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food6100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, flour or meal on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-938a95915274:2452271b3e66

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Ni reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Ni reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference45003400062600
Alternative weighting45003400062600

4 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Assaad et al. 2020150%
Sultana et al. 2021350%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-18a0eab448fb:7baf9a2e560d

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Cr reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Cr reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference127012701270
Alternative weighting127012701270

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food1100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-5ff0f5567689:f916b8f335aa

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Cr reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Cr reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference180039504700
Alternative weighting180039504700

5 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Assaad et al. 2020150%
Sultana et al. 2021450%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-6d61b34d2518:6660361b1250

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Sn reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Sn reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold. Herbal botanicals, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤10050–115 (bounded)100–130 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤10050–115 (bounded)100–130 (bounded)

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-8c5e4a4bdf93:79b2330f4cd1

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Co reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Co reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference503005030050300
Alternative weighting503005030050300

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Assaad et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Assaad et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-0f847fcf1eb5:abaefe91ac28

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Cu reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Cu reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference220051005300
Alternative weighting220051005300

6 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Assaad et al. 2020133%
Oladoye et al. 2016133%
Sultana et al. 2021433%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-393542d615de:ee32a7a76b93

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Fe reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Fe reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference2200107000211000
Alternative weighting2200107000211000

6 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Assaad et al. 2020133%
Oladoye et al. 2016133%
Sultana et al. 2021433%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-a6047af07641:b8ecf6390db5

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Mn reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Mn reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference306000805000805000
Alternative weighting306000805000805000

5 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Assaad et al. 2020150%
Sultana et al. 2021450%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-4795483a986e:7d7bcced1f0e

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Zn reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Zn reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference3820098400125000
Alternative weighting3820098400125000

5 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Assaad et al. 2020150%
Sultana et al. 2021450%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-0d00c2131522:296fdcd26b02

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI herbal botanicals Ba reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI herbal botanicals Ba reference · Herbal botanicals, as sold, dry weight. Herbal botanicals, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference947009470094700
Alternative weighting947009470094700

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Assaad et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for herbal botanicals, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Assaad et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for herbal botanicals, as sold on this basis in the completed herbal botanicals ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:herbal-botanicals-d6c0bd5e8b03:e7f03d2b89df

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

1 dataset

How metals reach herbal botanicals

The evidence on how metals reach herbal botanicals comes from studies that compared exposed and ordinary settings. Herbal botanicals, as sold from grown independently had total mercury higher at 14.2 µg/kg, against 9.39 µg/kg for all samples in the same study.7Fischer A, Brodziak-Dopierała B · 2022The Mercury Concentration in Spice PlantsProcessesRead source →

These are observational comparisons from single studies; the size of the difference depends on the site, metal and distance.

Which forms and regions measured lower

For lead, the HMI reference median was lowest for herbal botanicals, flour or meal (276 µg/kg) and highest for herbal botanicals, as sold (7,800 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →5Assaad N, Fadel D, Argyraki A, Kypritidou Z, Bakir A, Awad E · 2020Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →12Mehari TF, Greene L, Duncan AL, Fakayode SO · 2015Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source →13Sultana R, Chamon AS, Mondol MN · 2021Heavy metal concentration in commonly sold stem vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskDhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 2021, 30(2): 221-232Read source → The HMI reference for lead in herbal botanicals, as sold pools 18 subgroup units from 4 sampling families, with a median of 7,800 µg/kg and a middle half spanning 1,000 (lower quartile) and 20,500 µg/kg (upper quartile).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →5Assaad N, Fadel D, Argyraki A, Kypritidou Z, Bakir A, Awad E · 2020Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →12Mehari TF, Greene L, Duncan AL, Fakayode SO · 2015Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source →13Sultana R, Chamon AS, Mondol MN · 2021Heavy metal concentration in commonly sold stem vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskDhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 2021, 30(2): 221-232Read source → For lead in herbal botanicals, as sold, the reference median was between 101 and 139 µg/kg, with a middle half from between 12.4 and 18.3 to between 350 and 355 µg/kg across 78 units.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For lead in herbal botanicals, flour or meal, the reference median was 276 µg/kg, with a middle half from 133 to 302 µg/kg across 12 units.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, herbal botanicals, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.2 µg/kg) and the highest in SEARO (1,690 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in PAHO (13.5 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (250 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Targeted herbal botanicals, as sold samples in SEARO had lead higher at 420 µg/kg, against 374 µg/kg for SEARO in the same study.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In another study, targeted herbal botanicals, as sold samples in EURO had cadmium higher at 400 µg/kg, against 57 µg/kg for EURO in the same study.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

In one study, lead across 12 groups of herbal botanicals ranged from 2.2 µg/kg (PAHO) to 800 µg/kg (SEARO); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In another study, lead across 8 groups of herbal botanicals ranged from 80 µg/kg (peppermint tincture 1) to 2,570 µg/kg (commercial herbal drug 3, 2020 lot); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.4Shchukin VM, Blinkova EA, Kuzmina NE, Luttseva AI · 2022Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source →

Processing, cooking and preparation

Processed or prepared forms were compared only with unprocessed herbal botanicals in the same study and group. Herbal botanicals, flour or meal (EURO) had lead lower at 233 µg/kg, against 338 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (herbal botanicals, as sold).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Forms differ in water content, so a per-kilogram difference is not by itself a measured removal or gain of metal.

Mitigation for herbal botanicals

Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.

No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.

Trade-offs and limits of controls

Avoiding exposed growing areas lowered the metal measured in the studies available, but no study measured the cost or supply effect of doing so.7Fischer A, Brodziak-Dopierała B · 2022The Mercury Concentration in Spice PlantsProcessesRead source → Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.

Testing herbal botanicals for metals

Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 1 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 1,300 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 1.2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 100 µg/kg (Dghaim et al. 2015), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →14Dghaim R, Al Khatib S, Rasool H, Khan MA · 2015Determination of Heavy Metals Concentration in Traditional Herbs Commonly Consumed in the United Arab EmiratesJournal of Environmental and Public HealthRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 25 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 1,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.

Buying and verifying herbal botanicals

No maximum level for metals in herbal botanicals was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.

Exposure from herbal botanicals

No source in the library converted herbal botanicals concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.

Evidence review and remaining gaps

Every source record that names herbal botanicals was decided on its content: 28 occurrence extracted, 28 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.

References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.

Herbal botanicals FAQs

What heavy metals are found in herbal botanicals?

The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Ba, Mo, Sr and Tl in herbal botanicals, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2G. N. Abdel-Rahman, Mohamed B. M. Ahmed, Bassem A. Sabry, Safaa S. M. Ali · 2019Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsToxicology ReportsRead source →3Angelon-Gaetz KA, Klaus C, Chaudhry EA, Bean DK · 2018Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportRead source →4Shchukin VM, Blinkova EA, Kuzmina NE, Luttseva AI · 2022Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsRegulatory Research and Medicine EvaluationRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in herbal botanicals, as sold from 1,791 results in 5 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.2 to 1,690 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

How do heavy metals get into herbal botanicals?

In the studies available, herbal botanicals from contaminated or exposed settings carried more metal than herbal botanicals from the same study’s control.7Fischer A, Brodziak-Dopierała B · 2022The Mercury Concentration in Spice PlantsProcessesRead source → Herbal botanicals, as sold from grown independently had total mercury higher at 14.2 µg/kg, against 9.39 µg/kg for all samples in the same study.7Fischer A, Brodziak-Dopierała B · 2022The Mercury Concentration in Spice PlantsProcessesRead source →

Which types of herbal botanicals have the lowest levels?

For lead, the HMI reference median was lowest for herbal botanicals, flour or meal (276 µg/kg) and highest for herbal botanicals, as sold (7,800 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →5Assaad N, Fadel D, Argyraki A, Kypritidou Z, Bakir A, Awad E · 2020Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladJournal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162Read source →12Mehari TF, Greene L, Duncan AL, Fakayode SO · 2015Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source →13Sultana R, Chamon AS, Mondol MN · 2021Heavy metal concentration in commonly sold stem vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskDhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 2021, 30(2): 221-232Read source →

Which regions report the lowest levels in herbal botanicals?

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, herbal botanicals, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.2 µg/kg) and the highest in SEARO (1,690 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in PAHO (13.5 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (250 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Does processing change heavy metals in herbal botanicals?

Only comparisons between forms in the same study are available, not before-and-after measurements of the same herbal botanicals.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Herbal botanicals, flour or meal (EURO) had lead lower at 233 µg/kg, against 338 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (herbal botanicals, as sold).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

How much of the arsenic in herbal botanicals is inorganic?

Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 7 results from 2 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →15European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) · 2014Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source → European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 reported inorganic arsenic at 260 µg/kg (mean) in herbal botanicals, as sold from European dietary-survey occurrence data.15European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) · 2014Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source →

References

Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.

  1. GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsWorld Health Organization · GEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment Programme · 2026 · extranet.who.intDataset
  2. Heavy metals content in some non-alcoholic beverages (carbonated drinks, flavored yogurt drinks, and juice drinks) of the Egyptian marketsG. N. Abdel-Rahman, Mohamed B. M. Ahmed, Bassem A. Sabry, and Safaa S. M. Ali · Toxicology Reports · 2019 · doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.02.010Peer-reviewed
  3. Lead in Spices, Herbal Remedies, and Ceremonial Powders Sampled from Home Investigations for Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels — North Carolina, 2011–2018Angelon-Gaetz KA, Klaus C, Chaudhry EA, and Bean DK · MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · 2018 · doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6746a2Government
  4. Evaluation of Elemental Impurities in Peppermint Herb and Peppermint-Based Herbal ProductsShchukin VM, Blinkova EA, Kuzmina NE, and Luttseva AI · Regulatory Research and Medicine Evaluation · 2022 · doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2022-12-2-408Peer-reviewed
  5. Heavy Metals Accumulation in the Edible Vegetables of Lebanese Tabbouli SaladAssaad N, Fadel D, Argyraki A, Kypritidou Z, Bakir A, and Awad E · Journal of Agricultural Science 12(7):155-162 · 2020 · doi.org/10.5539/jas.v12n7p155Peer-reviewed
  6. Heavy metals in aromatic spices by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometryBua DG, Annuario G, Albergamo A, Cicero N, and Dugo G · Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B · 2016 · doi.org/10.1080/19393210.2016.1175516Peer-reviewed
  7. The Mercury Concentration in Spice PlantsFischer A and Brodziak-Dopierała B · Processes · 2022 · doi.org/10.3390/pr10101954Peer-reviewed
  8. Health risk assessment of Pb, Cd, and Zn in leafy and bulb vegetables from northern Iran using Monte Carlo simulationFalahati Naghibi E, Mehdinia SM, and Amouei A · Environmental Research Communications 7 (2025) 065030 · 2025 · doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ade1a9Peer-reviewed
  9. Assessment of toxic metals in commonly used herbs and spices in TurkeyÖzden H · İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy 51(3): 392-397 · 2021 · doi.org/10.26650/istanbuljpharm.2021.1000200Peer-reviewed
  10. Assessment of Heavy Metals Concentration and Health Risks of Selected Vegetables Sold In Jos MetropolisAdeniyi O, Bayo D, Adeniyi A, and Okeke-Agulu K · Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study 4(5) · 2021 · doi.org/10.31579/2694-0248/072Peer-reviewed
  11. Evaluation of heavy metals in herbal plants growing in Singrauli Region of Madhya PradeshSarita Patel, Manisha Pradhan, and Ashish Patel · International Journal of Chemical and Biological Sciences · 2023 · doi.org/10.33545/26646765.2023.v5.i2a.66Peer-reviewed
  12. Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAMehari TF, Greene L, Duncan AL, and Fakayode SO · Journal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583 · 2015 · doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.66052Peer-reviewed
  13. Heavy metal concentration in commonly sold stem vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskSultana R, Chamon AS, and Mondol MN · Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 2021, 30(2): 221-232 · 2021 · doi.org/10.3329/dujbs.v30i2.54648Peer-reviewed
  14. Determination of Heavy Metals Concentration in Traditional Herbs Commonly Consumed in the United Arab EmiratesDghaim R, Al Khatib S, Rasool H, and Khan MA · Journal of Environmental and Public Health · 2015 · doi.org/10.1155/2015/973878Peer-reviewed
  15. Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) · EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597 · 2014 · doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3597Government

Sources

Browse Herbal botanicals Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.

Update history

22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every herbal botanicals record in the library: 28 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.