Overview
Suzuki and colleagues measured nano-sized mercury-containing particles (NP-Hg), total mercury (T-Hg), methylmercury (MeHg), and selenium in raw fish and shellfish purchased in Japan. The study reports occurrence data for seafood groups and uses Japanese consumption data to estimate dietary exposure to T-Hg, MeHg, and NP-Hg. NP-Hg is treated as a separate nanoparticulate mercury finding in this page, not as a substitute for T-Hg or MeHg.
Key numbers
Ninety samples from eight raw seafood groups were purchased in Japan between 2019 and 2020: tuna and swordfish n = 44; salmon and trout n = 10; horse mackerel and sardine n = 4; sea bream and flounder n = 2; other raw fishes n = 13; squid and octopus n = 11; shellfish n = 3; and shrimp and crab n = 3.
Table 2 reports mean consumption rates, concentrations, and estimated dietary exposure for the Japanese population age >1 year:
| Group | Food consumption rate (g/day) | T-Hg concentration (ng/g as Hg) | Me-Hg concentration (ng/g as Hg) | NP-Hg concentration (ng/g as Hg) | T-Hg dietary exposure (μg/day as Hg) | Me-Hg dietary exposure (μg/day as Hg) | NP-Hg dietary exposure (μg/day as Hg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tuna and swordfish | 3.8 | 656 | 631 | 12.0 | 2.49 | 2.40 | 0.0456 |
| Other | 6.8 | 241 | 220 | 1.87 | 1.64 | 1.49 | 0.0127 |
| Red snapper and flounder | 4.5 | 140 | 124 | 0.765 | 0.630 | 0.556 | 0.0034 |
| Salmon and trout | 5.4 | 73.5 | 70.0 | 0.153 | 0.397 | 0.378 | 0.0008 |
| Horse mackerel and sardine | 7.5 | 31.6 | 24.5 | 0.128 | 0.237 | 0.184 | 0.0010 |
| Shrimp and crab | 3.5 | 55.4 | 53.6 | 0.286 | 0.194 | 0.188 | 0.0010 |
| Squid and octopus | 3.0 | 45.0 | 37.6 | 0.114 | 0.135 | 0.113 | 0.0003 |
| Shellfish | 2.8 | 8.75 | 4.05 | 0.755 | 0.0245 | 0.011 | 0.0021 |
| Total | not reported in extracted text | not applicable | not applicable | not applicable | 5.75 | 5.32 | 0.0670 |
The results text states that mean T-Hg concentrations were highest in the tuna-swordfish group at 656 ng/g as Hg and lowest in the shellfish group at 8.75 ng/g. Mean MeHg concentrations followed the same pattern, with tuna-swordfish at 631 ng/g as Hg and shellfish at 4.05 ng/g as Hg.
For NP-Hg, the abstract reports higher particle number concentrations in tuna-swordfish than shellfish, 17.7 x 10^7 versus 1.2 x 10^6 particles/g. The results text reports mean particle mass concentration highest in tuna-swordfish at 12.0 ng/g as Hg and lowest in squid-octopus at 0.10 ng/g as Hg.
A representative tuna muscle sample in Figure 2 had T-Hg 2221 ng/g as Hg, MeHg:T-Hg ratio 91.3%, 2486 particles detected over 300-s, CPM 90.5 ng/g as Hg, and CPN 1.1 x 10^9 particles/g. Assuming detected NP-Hg were spherical HgSe, mean particle size was estimated at 29.0 nm and maximum particle size at 89.7 nm.
The abstract and discussion report mean dietary exposure estimates of NP-Hg 0.067 μg/person per day, T-Hg 5.75 μg/person per day, and MeHg 5.32 μg/person per day. The paper also reports mean dietary exposure to NP-Hg as 1.2 ng/kg body weight (BW) per day, using a 55 kg body weight.
Methods (brief)
Raw fish and shellfish samples were purchased in Japan in 2019-2020. Shellfish were homogenized with internal organs because they are usually eaten that way; all other fish samples used muscle tissue only. T-Hg was determined by thermal decomposition mercury analyzer (MA-3000; Nippon Instruments), MeHg by HPLC-ICP-MS after 10% TMAH extraction, selenium by ICP-MS after microwave-assisted digestion, and NP-Hg by spICP-MS after pancreatin/lipase enzyme extraction and ultrafiltration. The paper reports a single-particle mass LOD of 0.038-0.049 fg, equivalent to a particle-diameter LOD of 20.9-22.9 nm, and notes that NP-Hg below that size could make exposure estimates an underestimate.
Implications
This source contributes Japanese-market seafood occurrence data for T-Hg, MeHg, and nanoparticulate mercury across mixed fish and shellfish groups. The routing value is strongest for seafood mercury speciation because T-Hg and MeHg are both measured and reported separately, while NP-Hg is a distinct nanoparticle finding rather than a replacement for either mercury species. The exposure table is useful context, but downstream pooling should preserve the source units and the paper’s group-level seafood categories.
Verification notes
- PDF text extracted with
pdftotext -layout; title page, methods, Figures 1-5 captions, Table 1, Table 2, discussion, and conclusion were readable. - DOI
10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119555, raw handleMFK_presence-of-nano-sized-mercury-containing-particle, and cite-key checks found no existing source page before creation. - Table 2 values were checked against the extracted text. Units are preserved as
ng/g as Hg,μg/day as Hg,particles/g,nm, andng/kg body weight (BW) per day; no conversion was performed. - Speciation: the page keeps T-Hg and MeHg separate. NP-Hg is reported as nano-sized mercury-containing particles, inferred by the authors as likely HgSe under stated assumptions; it is not collapsed into T-Hg, MeHg, or inorganic mercury frontmatter.
- Brand firewall: samples were grouped by seafood type and no product brands were reported.
- Frontmatter product and ingredient slugs were checked against
docs/gpt-collaboration/taxonomy-snapshot.md; no new slug was invented. There is no closed-vocabulary metal/frontmatter slug for NP-Hg or HgSe nanoparticles, so they remain documented in the body. - Source-internal group-name inconsistency: the methods describe the
n = 2group as “sea bream and flounder” (section 2.1) while Table 2 labels the same row “Red snapper and flounder.” Both names refer to the same group; downstream pooling should not treat them as separate cells.
Update history
This page has no substantive edit history yet. Future revisions will be recorded here once the change lands in git.