Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Pulsed electric field processing as an alternative to warm water treatment for the reduction of potentially toxic elements in Saccharina latissima

Source

Sund and coauthors compared pulsed electric field processing with warm-water treatment for reducing iodine and potentially toxic elements in Saccharina latissima.

Page snapshot
Cited by9 pages
Metals measured4
Evidence tierA
Year2026

Overview

Sund and coauthors compared pulsed electric field processing with warm-water treatment for reducing iodine and potentially toxic elements in Saccharina latissima. The source is processing and mitigation evidence for seaweed-kelp foods. It reports that PEF at the highest level reduced iodine by 25%, warm-water treatment reduced iodine by 19%, and PEF retained less lead than warm-water treatment.

Key numbers

The paper reports three PEF levels with 200, 500, and 800 pulses. PEF 3 reduced iodine concentration by 25%; warm-water treatment reduced iodine by 19%. True-retention values showed 58-73% arsenic retention during processing, 81-86% cadmium retention, 80-88% mercury retention, and 96% lead retention in warm-water-treated seaweed. The text reports that PEF processing had lower lead retention than warm-water treatment.

Table 3 reports mineral and potentially toxic element concentrations on a dry-weight basis. Extracted examples include macro-mineral values such as unprocessed calcium 8,970 +/- 340 mg/kg dry weight and sodium 65,600 +/- 2,000 mg/kg dry weight; the PTE rows require rendered-table verification before sample-level extraction.

Methods (brief)

Ground Saccharina latissima was mixed with water and processed by pulsed electric field at three pulse counts or by warm-water treatment at 60 degrees C water bath conditions for 120 seconds. Chemical analyses of PTEs, minerals, and amino acids were used to calculate mass balances and true retention.

Implications

Certification: Useful mitigation evidence for seaweed-kelp foods. It supports processing-effect notes, not raw occurrence pooling without treatment stratification.

Courses: Provides a concrete example of why mitigation claims need mass-balance or true-retention accounting rather than concentration-only comparisons.

App: Can support a processed-seaweed qualifier if synthesis distinguishes raw, PEF-treated, and warm-water-treated forms.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

The DOI was minted with a 2025 identifier and the PDF was published online in 2025, but the journal issue is Journal of Applied Phycology 38:933-945 (2026); the frontmatter year follows the PDF issue year. The extracted text did not preserve all Table 3 PTE concentration rows cleanly, so those rows should be verified from the rendered PDF before structured benchmark pooling.

Update history

This page has no substantive edit history yet. Future revisions will be recorded here once the change lands in git.