Skip to content
Ca

Cadmium transfer from contaminated soils to the human body through rice consumption in southern Jiangsu Province, China

Li et al.

Researched by
K. Pendergrass iD
Last updated: 2026-06-08
Page Snapshot
Reconstructable record

Li et al. 2017 — Cadmium transfer from Jiangsu soils into rice

Li and colleagues studied cadmium transfer through a soil-rice-human chain in southern Jiangsu Province, China. The authors collected 70 paired Indica rice-grain and surface-soil samples, measured Cd and Zn by ICP-MS, and used RIVM in vitro digestion to estimate bioaccessible Cd in rice grain. The source is a supply-chain occurrence paper: rice-grain Cd is the product-facing evidence, while soil chemistry and extractable Cd/Zn are context for predicting rice Cd and bioaccessible rice Cd.

Key numbers

FindingSource-reported value
Paired samples70 rice-grain/soil pairs, 14 from each of five southern Jiangsu areas
Rice typeAll rice samples were Indica rice
Rice-grain Cd rank by areaDS > YF > EH > TC > WT
Rice samples above the source-cited 0.2 mg kg-1 staple-rice criterionDS 100%, YF 42.86%, EH 14.29%, TC 7.14%, WT 0%
Total soil Cd range0.17 to 10.50 mg kg-1
Mean soil Cd across studied areas1.45 mg kg-1
CaCl2-Cd fraction of total soil Cd0.40-26.92%, with mean value 9.06%
Soil-to-rice transfer fractionAbout 14.89% of total Cd concentration in soils transferred from soil to rice grain
Soil-to-human bioaccessible fraction via riceCd Bio in rice accounted for about 3.19% of total Cd concentration in soil
Total rice Cd prediction modelCd rice grains = 0.167 + 2.547·CaCl2-Cd -0.532·CaCl2-Zn; R2=0.862
Total rice Cd simple modelY = -0.033 + 2.245X1; R2=0.785, where X1 is CaCl2 extracted Cd concentration in soil
Total rice Cd vs bioaccessible rice CdY = 0.13X - 0.0015; R2 = 0.82, p<0.05, where X is total Cd and Y is Cd Bio in rice
Bioaccessible rice Cd MLR model 1Y = 0.011 + 0.086X1; R2=0.307
Bioaccessible rice Cd MLR model 2Y = -0.035 + 0.083X1 - 6.580-5X2; R2=0.511
Bioaccessible rice Cd curve modelsQuadratic R2=0.862; cubic R2=0.892; the authors chose the cubic model as best fit
Rice-grain concentration table availabilityExact rice-grain Cd concentrations by sample or area were not reported as a readable numeric table in the extracted text

The rice-grain exceedance percentages are product-facing occurrence evidence for rice-bulk-grain. Soil Cd, CaCl2-extractable Cd/Zn, and regression equations are retained as supply-chain context and should not be entered as product concentration values.

Methods (brief)

The authors collected paired rice grains and 0-15 cm soils from Yifeng, Dingshu, Ehu, Wangting, and Taicang in southern Jiangsu Province. Soil samples were air-dried, ground, and sieved; rice grains were oven-dried at 105 deg C for 1 h and then at 70 deg C to constant weight, ground, and sieved. Rice samples were digested with HClO4 and HNO3 for 6 hours, and Cd/Zn concentrations were determined by ICP-MS (XSERIES, Thermo Electron). CaCl2-extractable Cd and Zn were obtained with 0.01 M CaCl2 shaken for 16 hours at a 10:1 solution-to-soil ratio. Cd bioaccessibility in rice grain was measured with the RIVM in vitro digestion model. QA/QC used certified reference materials GBW10010 for rice plants and GBW07442, GBW07443, GBW07402, GBW07403, GBW07404, and GBW07406 for soils; recoveries were 93-105% for GSB-1 and 95-105% for the soil CRMs, with replicate relative difference below 5%.

Implications

This source supports rice-bulk-grain cadmium routing for a Chinese contaminated-soil supply-chain setting. It provides an unusually explicit bridge between soil phytoavailable Cd, total rice-grain Cd, and bioaccessible rice Cd, but the source page should keep those compartments separate: soil numbers describe the field environment, rice exceedance percentages describe the edible product, and RIVM outputs describe digestive bioaccessibility. Because the extracted text does not provide a clean sample-level or area-level numeric rice Cd table, downstream pooling should use this paper cautiously unless the formatted final article or figure data are retrieved.

Verification notes

  • PDF text extracted with pdftotext -layout; the accepted-manuscript text, methods, soil Table 1, regression Tables 2-4, and Results prose were readable.
  • DOI verified from the accepted-manuscript cover and running headers as 10.1039/C6EM00631K; DOI, raw handle MFK_li2017, and cite-key checks found no existing source page before creation.
  • All numbers above were checked against the extracted abstract, sampling/methods text, Results sections 3.1-3.5, and Tables 1-4.
  • Units are preserved as reported (mg kg-1, percentages, R2 values); no dry-weight to wet-weight or food-basis conversion was performed.
  • Speciation: cadmium is reported as Cd; no arsenic, mercury, or chromium speciation issue applies.
  • Rice occurrence vs soil context: soil Cd and CaCl2-extractable values are not product concentration values. This page routes to rice because the source reports rice-grain Cd exceedance percentages and rice-grain Cd models from paired soil/rice sampling.
  • Exact sample-level or area-mean rice Cd concentrations were not cleanly available in the extracted text; the page therefore does not invent or visually estimate them from figures.
  • Frontmatter product and ingredient slugs were checked against docs/gpt-collaboration/taxonomy-snapshot.md; no new product or ingredient slug was invented.

Page history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateDescription
e038a802026-07-02feat(index): category SECTION pages + lean directory (Examine hierarchy)