Zhang et al. 2024 - Lettuce cadmium under greenhouse amendment treatments
Zhang and colleagues measured cadmium uptake in lettuce grown for one cycle in a Cd-enriched solar greenhouse soil in Shaanxi, China. This is primary lettuce Cd evidence, but it is an intervention trial in contaminated greenhouse soil rather than a retail or ordinary-market occurrence survey. The routeable facts are the dry-sample aboveground lettuce Cd concentrations under deep plowing, soil covering, phosphorus fertilizers, biochar, attapulgite clay, and nano-hydroxyapatite treatments.
Key numbers
Experimental soil and materials
The experimental soil was a Lou-type heavy loam with pH 7.83 +/- 0.10, organic matter 36.12 +/- 1.2 g/kg, total nitrogen 1.72 +/- 0.06 g/kg, available phosphorus 302.6 +/- 8.52 mg/kg, available potassium 721.6 +/- 14.39 mg/kg, CEC 24.21 +/- 2 cmol+/kg, and Cd 1.75 +/- 0.41 mg/kg. The soil used for the 15 cm surface-covering treatment came from a nearby greenhouse not contaminated by Cd and had Cd 0.24 +/- 0.15 mg/kg.
The phosphorus fertilizers were diammonium phosphate (DAP), calcium magnesium phosphate (CMP), and calcium superphosphate (SSP), with P2O5 contents of 44%, 12.5%, and 46%, respectively. The paper states that Cd in the phosphorus fertilizers was less than 10 mg/kg. Soil conditioners were corn-straw biochar (pH 8.45), attapulgite clay, and analytical-grade nano-hydroxyapatite.
Physical measures
Figure 1 and the Results text report aboveground lettuce Cd values for the physical-measure experiment. The customary 15 cm plowing depth was the control (CK). Values are mg/kg in dried aboveground lettuce tissue based on the method’s drying and grinding protocol.
| Treatment | Aboveground lettuce Cd (mg/kg) | Reduction vs CK |
|---|---|---|
| 15 cm plowing (CK) | 2.57 | baseline |
| 30 cm deep plowing | 2.30 | 10.7% |
| 40 cm deep plowing | 1.84 | 28.4% |
| 50 cm deep plowing | 2.08 | 19.0% |
| 15 cm surface covering soil | 0.98 | 61.8% |
The authors describe the 40 cm plowing result as significantly lower than CK but significantly higher than the soil-covering treatment. Soil covering gave the largest Cd reduction, but Table 1 showed physical treatments also reduced lettuce biomass relative to CK.
Phosphorus fertilizer treatments
Figure 2 reports Cd in aboveground lettuce on a dry-weight basis under DAP, CMP, and SSP. All fertilizer treatments increased Cd relative to the no-fertilizer CK in this experiment, though CMP decreased with increasing rate.
| Fertilizer | P2O5 application rate (kg/ha) | Aboveground lettuce Cd (mg/kg DW) |
|---|---|---|
| None (CK) | 0 | 0.99 |
| DAP | 75 | 1.01 |
| DAP | 150 | 1.53 |
| DAP | 225 | 1.72 |
| CMP | 75 | 1.51 |
| CMP | 150 | 1.47 |
| CMP | 225 | 1.07 |
| SSP | 75 | 1.12 |
| SSP | 150 | 1.60 |
| SSP | 225 | 1.89 |
The text reports that DAP at 150 and 225 kg/ha P2O5 increased lettuce Cd by 51.5% and 70.3% relative to the 75 kg/ha DAP treatment. For SSP, Cd increased with rate. For CMP, the 225 kg/ha P2O5 treatment was lower than the 75 and 150 kg/ha treatments.
Soil conditioners
The abstract and figures report conditioner-treatment Cd values as mean +/- SD in mg/kg for aboveground lettuce. Biochar increased Cd at low-to-mid rates and reduced it at the highest tested rates.
| Biochar rate (t/ha) | Aboveground lettuce Cd (mg/kg) |
|---|---|
| 0 (CK) | 1.36 +/- 0.27 |
| 2 | 1.47 +/- 0.56 |
| 4 | 1.80 +/- 0.73 |
| 6 | 1.96 +/- 0.12 |
| 8 | 1.89 +/- 0.52 |
| 10 | 1.44 +/- 0.30 |
| 12 | 1.10 +/- 0.27 |
Attapulgite clay increased lettuce Cd at every tested rate relative to the experiment’s CK, with the highest mean at 120 kg/ha.
| Attapulgite clay rate (kg/ha) | Aboveground lettuce Cd (mg/kg) |
|---|---|
| 0 (CK) | 1.44 +/- 0.48 |
| 40 | 1.88 +/- 0.67 |
| 80 | 2.10 +/- 0.80 |
| 120 | 2.24 +/- 0.75 |
| 160 | 1.78 +/- 0.41 |
| 200 | 1.88 +/- 0.48 |
Nano-hydroxyapatite Cd values increased through 120 kg/ha, then fell at 160 kg/ha and partially rebounded at 200 kg/ha. The paper states there was no significant difference versus CK among nano-hydroxyapatite treatments.
| Nano-hydroxyapatite rate (kg/ha) | Aboveground lettuce Cd (mg/kg) |
|---|---|
| 0 (CK) | 1.34 +/- 0.56 |
| 40 | 1.47 +/- 0.10 |
| 80 | 1.60 +/- 0.44 |
| 120 | 1.70 +/- 0.21 |
| 160 | 1.31 +/- 0.09 |
| 200 | 1.51 +/- 0.34 |
Methods (brief)
The trial was conducted in a solar greenhouse in Nanying Village, Wuquan Town, Yangling District, Shaanxi Province, China. Lettuce cultivar Lisheng No. 2 was transplanted at the fourth-leaf stage and sampled 60 days after planting. Plots were arranged as randomized blocks with three replicates per treatment; each plot was 2 m by 1.5 m, and 30 lettuce plants were planted per plot. Aboveground lettuce tissue was washed, dried at 105 C for 1 hour and then 75 C to constant weight, ground, digested with HNO3-HClO4 (3:1), and analyzed for Cd by Hitachi Z-2000 atomic absorption spectrometry. Spinach standard material GBW-10015 was used for quality control with reported recovery of 95 +/- 5%.
Implications
Certification: This source should not be pooled as normal-market lettuce occurrence evidence. It is a Cd-contaminated greenhouse intervention trial with dry-tissue results and treatment-specific controls. It can support context on agronomic mitigation and on how alkaline greenhouse soil, phosphate fertilizer, and amendments can shift lettuce Cd uptake.
Courses: Strong example for teaching why soil-remediation interventions are not automatically protective. In this alkaline field, phosphorus fertilizer increased lettuce Cd, and low rates of biochar, attapulgite clay, and nano-hydroxyapatite tended to raise Cd before higher rates reduced it or plateaued.
App: Route as lettuce Cd context and as a soil-to-plant-transfer/mitigation source. Do not present the high dry-weight Cd values as representative of ordinary consumer lettuce without the contaminated-greenhouse caveat.
Wiki pages this source may touch
Verification notes
The PDF has author attribution and DOI 10.3390/biology13050332; no DOI conflict was observed. The article contains an internal contradiction for the physical-measure Cd results: the abstract reports 30 cm, 40 cm, 50 cm, and soil-covering values of 1.49 +/- 0.45, 1.26 +/- 0.02, 1.00 +/- 0.21, and 0.24 +/- 0.13 mg/kg, but Figure 1 and the Results text report 2.30, 1.84, 2.08, and 0.98 mg/kg against CK 2.57. This page follows the Results text and Figure 1 for the primary physical-measure values and preserves the contradiction here for audit. Brand/trade names for the cultivar and supplier companies are not used as routing targets under the brand firewall. The paper reports total Cd only; no Pb, As, Hg, Cr, Ni, or speciation data are reported for lettuce.
Page history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.
| Commit | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| c1aef38 | 2026-06-02 | audit-queue: hamid2021-bacterial-plant-biostimulants-review → audited-promote |