Skip to content

Zhang et al. 2024 - Lettuce cadmium under greenhouse amendment treatments

Zhang and colleagues measured cadmium uptake in lettuce grown for one cycle in a Cd-enriched solar greenhouse soil in Shaanxi, China. This is primary lettuce Cd evidence, but it is an intervention trial in contaminated greenhouse soil rather than a retail or ordinary-market occurrence survey. The routeable facts are the dry-sample aboveground lettuce Cd concentrations under deep plowing, soil covering, phosphorus fertilizers, biochar, attapulgite clay, and nano-hydroxyapatite treatments.

Key numbers

Experimental soil and materials

The experimental soil was a Lou-type heavy loam with pH 7.83 +/- 0.10, organic matter 36.12 +/- 1.2 g/kg, total nitrogen 1.72 +/- 0.06 g/kg, available phosphorus 302.6 +/- 8.52 mg/kg, available potassium 721.6 +/- 14.39 mg/kg, CEC 24.21 +/- 2 cmol+/kg, and Cd 1.75 +/- 0.41 mg/kg. The soil used for the 15 cm surface-covering treatment came from a nearby greenhouse not contaminated by Cd and had Cd 0.24 +/- 0.15 mg/kg.

The phosphorus fertilizers were diammonium phosphate (DAP), calcium magnesium phosphate (CMP), and calcium superphosphate (SSP), with P2O5 contents of 44%, 12.5%, and 46%, respectively. The paper states that Cd in the phosphorus fertilizers was less than 10 mg/kg. Soil conditioners were corn-straw biochar (pH 8.45), attapulgite clay, and analytical-grade nano-hydroxyapatite.

Physical measures

Figure 1 and the Results text report aboveground lettuce Cd values for the physical-measure experiment. The customary 15 cm plowing depth was the control (CK). Values are mg/kg in dried aboveground lettuce tissue based on the method’s drying and grinding protocol.

TreatmentAboveground lettuce Cd (mg/kg)Reduction vs CK
15 cm plowing (CK)2.57baseline
30 cm deep plowing2.3010.7%
40 cm deep plowing1.8428.4%
50 cm deep plowing2.0819.0%
15 cm surface covering soil0.9861.8%

The authors describe the 40 cm plowing result as significantly lower than CK but significantly higher than the soil-covering treatment. Soil covering gave the largest Cd reduction, but Table 1 showed physical treatments also reduced lettuce biomass relative to CK.

Phosphorus fertilizer treatments

Figure 2 reports Cd in aboveground lettuce on a dry-weight basis under DAP, CMP, and SSP. All fertilizer treatments increased Cd relative to the no-fertilizer CK in this experiment, though CMP decreased with increasing rate.

FertilizerP2O5 application rate (kg/ha)Aboveground lettuce Cd (mg/kg DW)
None (CK)00.99
DAP751.01
DAP1501.53
DAP2251.72
CMP751.51
CMP1501.47
CMP2251.07
SSP751.12
SSP1501.60
SSP2251.89

The text reports that DAP at 150 and 225 kg/ha P2O5 increased lettuce Cd by 51.5% and 70.3% relative to the 75 kg/ha DAP treatment. For SSP, Cd increased with rate. For CMP, the 225 kg/ha P2O5 treatment was lower than the 75 and 150 kg/ha treatments.

Soil conditioners

The abstract and figures report conditioner-treatment Cd values as mean +/- SD in mg/kg for aboveground lettuce. Biochar increased Cd at low-to-mid rates and reduced it at the highest tested rates.

Biochar rate (t/ha)Aboveground lettuce Cd (mg/kg)
0 (CK)1.36 +/- 0.27
21.47 +/- 0.56
41.80 +/- 0.73
61.96 +/- 0.12
81.89 +/- 0.52
101.44 +/- 0.30
121.10 +/- 0.27

Attapulgite clay increased lettuce Cd at every tested rate relative to the experiment’s CK, with the highest mean at 120 kg/ha.

Attapulgite clay rate (kg/ha)Aboveground lettuce Cd (mg/kg)
0 (CK)1.44 +/- 0.48
401.88 +/- 0.67
802.10 +/- 0.80
1202.24 +/- 0.75
1601.78 +/- 0.41
2001.88 +/- 0.48

Nano-hydroxyapatite Cd values increased through 120 kg/ha, then fell at 160 kg/ha and partially rebounded at 200 kg/ha. The paper states there was no significant difference versus CK among nano-hydroxyapatite treatments.

Nano-hydroxyapatite rate (kg/ha)Aboveground lettuce Cd (mg/kg)
0 (CK)1.34 +/- 0.56
401.47 +/- 0.10
801.60 +/- 0.44
1201.70 +/- 0.21
1601.31 +/- 0.09
2001.51 +/- 0.34

Methods (brief)

The trial was conducted in a solar greenhouse in Nanying Village, Wuquan Town, Yangling District, Shaanxi Province, China. Lettuce cultivar Lisheng No. 2 was transplanted at the fourth-leaf stage and sampled 60 days after planting. Plots were arranged as randomized blocks with three replicates per treatment; each plot was 2 m by 1.5 m, and 30 lettuce plants were planted per plot. Aboveground lettuce tissue was washed, dried at 105 C for 1 hour and then 75 C to constant weight, ground, digested with HNO3-HClO4 (3:1), and analyzed for Cd by Hitachi Z-2000 atomic absorption spectrometry. Spinach standard material GBW-10015 was used for quality control with reported recovery of 95 +/- 5%.

Implications

Certification: This source should not be pooled as normal-market lettuce occurrence evidence. It is a Cd-contaminated greenhouse intervention trial with dry-tissue results and treatment-specific controls. It can support context on agronomic mitigation and on how alkaline greenhouse soil, phosphate fertilizer, and amendments can shift lettuce Cd uptake.

Courses: Strong example for teaching why soil-remediation interventions are not automatically protective. In this alkaline field, phosphorus fertilizer increased lettuce Cd, and low rates of biochar, attapulgite clay, and nano-hydroxyapatite tended to raise Cd before higher rates reduced it or plateaued.

App: Route as lettuce Cd context and as a soil-to-plant-transfer/mitigation source. Do not present the high dry-weight Cd values as representative of ordinary consumer lettuce without the contaminated-greenhouse caveat.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

The PDF has author attribution and DOI 10.3390/biology13050332; no DOI conflict was observed. The article contains an internal contradiction for the physical-measure Cd results: the abstract reports 30 cm, 40 cm, 50 cm, and soil-covering values of 1.49 +/- 0.45, 1.26 +/- 0.02, 1.00 +/- 0.21, and 0.24 +/- 0.13 mg/kg, but Figure 1 and the Results text report 2.30, 1.84, 2.08, and 0.98 mg/kg against CK 2.57. This page follows the Results text and Figure 1 for the primary physical-measure values and preserves the contradiction here for audit. Brand/trade names for the cultivar and supplier companies are not used as routing targets under the brand firewall. The paper reports total Cd only; no Pb, As, Hg, Cr, Ni, or speciation data are reported for lettuce.

Page history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateDescription
c1aef382026-06-02audit-queue: hamid2021-bacterial-plant-biostimulants-review audited-promote