Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Lead in game meat: a study of bioaccessibility of lead metal fragments

Source

Qvarfort and Holmgren measured total lead and simulated gastrointestinal release of lead from metallic fragments in wild-boar tissues collected around bullet wound channels.

Page snapshot
Cited by6 pages
Metals measured1
Evidence tierC
Year2025

Overview

Qvarfort and Holmgren measured total lead and simulated gastrointestinal release of lead from metallic fragments in wild-boar tissues collected around bullet wound channels. The study is not a representative market-occurrence survey; it deliberately sampled the most contaminated wound-channel tissues so that metallic-lead dissolution could be tested. It is useful as game-meat lead-fragment bioaccessibility context, with its measured tissue lead values kept on the source’s mg/kg ww basis.

Key numbers

  • Article identity: Journal of Analytical Techniques and Research 7, pages 09-22, DOI 10.26502/jatr.47; the PDF prints received December 18, 2024, accepted December 26, 2025, and published February 11, 2025.
  • Object 1: male wild boar (Sus scrofa), live weight 45.5 kg, shooting distance 75 metres, calibre 6.5 -284, muzzle velocity 890 m/sec, calculated impact velocity 840 m/sec, bullet weight 9.1 grams (140grs).
  • Object 2: female wild boar (Sus scrofa), live weight 72 kg, shooting distance 25 metres, calibre 6,5x55, muzzle velocity 870 m/sec, calculated impact velocity 845 m/sec, bullet weight 10.1 grams (156 grs), bullet entrance Left side, 3th rib, bullet exit Right side, 4th rib.
  • Study design: samples were taken from a 9 centimeters wound-channel diameter and from a 6.5 centimeters radius around the wound-channel center, plus chest-wall, lung, and heart tissues; sample weights were 20 to 120 gram.
  • CT/radiography context: the authors state that lead fragments smaller than 1/10 millimeter were observable in high magnification images and that Figure 3 showed maximum lead-fragment distance through bloodstreams in the chest cavity of 134 mm for Object 1.
  • Overall source summary: total mean lead content for all samples was 273.6 mg/kg ww for n=17; the source states this high mean reflects deliberate wound-channel sampling rather than normal edible-meat sampling.
  • Source-side bioaccessibility summary: the Results section states that bioaccessible lead varied between 0.13 to 2% with mean 0.98 %, but Table 4 includes one 2.38 percent value; the abstract and Summary also describe the bioaccessible part as less than 2% in most samples and report mean 0.5%.

Table 3, Object 1 wound-channel and nearby tissue samples:

SampleTotal lead (mg/kg ww)In vitro gastrointestinal and intestinal (mg/kg ww)Bioaccessible part (% of total lead)Source location
I11310.540.41Centre wound channel, entrance
I272.391.121.55r= 3 cm I
I33411.090.32r= 3 cm II
I42212.030.92Chest wall, entrance
U119551.250.06Centre wound channel, exit
U384.80.881.04r= 6.5 cm I
U422.30.341.52r= 6.5 cm II
U613.80.060.43r= 10 cm III
U75891.250.21Chest wall, exit

Table 4, Object 2 wound-channel and nearby tissue samples:

SampleTotal lead (mg/kg ww)In vitro gastrointestinal and intestinal (mg/kg ww)Bioaccessible part (% of total lead)Source location
In 1580.831.43Centre wound channel, entrance
In 3120.242r= 6.5 cm II
In 4130,191.46r= 6.5 cm III
In 53.70.092.38Chest wall, entrance
In 65900.740.13Lung and heart tissue, entrance
U13901.60.41Centre wound channel, exit
U31000.730.73r= 6.5 cm II
U5140.231.64Chest wall, exit
U80.097--Control sample, neck tissue

Table 2, Object 1 gastric-versus-intestinal dissolution check:

SampleTotal lead (mg/kg ww)In vitro gastrointestinal (mg/kg ww)Intestinal (mg/kg ww)Difference (mg/kg ww)
I11310.540.580.04
I272.391.121.02-0.1
I33411.091.01-0.08
I42212.031.21-0.82
U119551.250.89-0.36
U384.80.880.62-0.26
U422.30.340.23-0.11
U613.80.060.04-0.04
U75891.251.17-0.08

Table 5, lead-shot-only gastrointestinal simulation:

Statistic/sampleGastric juice (%)Intestinal juice (%)
Sample 10.64<0.05
Sample 20.29<0.05
Sample 30.74<0.05
Sample 40.35<0.05
Sample 50.66<0.05
Sample 60.57<0.05
Mean value0.61-
Median0.54-

Methods (brief)

The authors CT-scanned deep-frozen, uneviscerated wild boars in natural posture, then used CT and high-resolution radiography to locate lead fragments around the wound channel and in chest-cavity tissues. Semi-thawed samples were homogenized into a meat paste, flattened into paper molds, frozen, X-rayed, and divided so one portion could be analyzed for total lead and the second could undergo in vitro gastrointestinal simulation. Total lead was measured after heating samples at 4500 C for 12 hours, leaching ash with 7M HNO3, autoclaving at 200 kPa (120°C) for 30 minutes, and analyzing by SS 028150-2/ ICP-MS and SS 028150-2/ ICP-AES; procedural blanks were < 0.0005 mg/L. The in vitro simulation used gastric juice adjusted to pH 3, 2.5 hours at 37oC, then intestinal juice adjusted to pH 6.3 for an additional 2 hours at 37oC, followed by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm.

Implications

Certification (HMTc): This source should not be pooled as representative game-meat market occurrence because sampling intentionally targeted wound-channel tissues, which the authors say are normally cut away and discarded. It is useful as C-tier source-pathway context for the fraction of metallic bullet lead that becomes bioaccessible under the study’s in vitro conditions.

Courses: The paper is useful for separating total metallic lead in tissue, bioaccessible lead released during digestion, and bioavailable lead absorbed by the body. It also illustrates why sample location around a bullet wound channel can dominate measured game-meat lead values.

App: The source can support explanatory game-meat cards about lead-fragment dissolution, while warning that wound-channel samples are not the same as ordinary retail or served portions.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • PDF text was extracted with pdftotext -layout to /tmp/mfk_june8_583.txt; the article identity block, Summary, CT/sample-collection methods, lead-analysis methods, in vitro simulation methods, Tables 1-5, Results and Discussion, Summing up, and references were checked against this page.
  • DOI 10.26502/jatr.47, title text, raw handle MFK_lead-in-game-meat-a-study-of-bioaccessibility, and candidate cite-key qvarfort2025-game-meat-lead-bioaccessibility were searched before creation; no existing source page was found.
  • Numerical values are copied without unit conversion. Table 4 preserves the source’s printed decimal comma in 0,19; Table 5 preserves <0.05.
  • Source-internal inconsistencies are retained rather than reconciled: the identity block prints an impossible accepted/published sequence; the abstract/Summary say less than 2% and mean 0.5%, the Results prose says 0.13 to 2% (mean 0.98 %), while Table 4 includes 2.38; Results prose says Object 2 total lead ranges 14 to 590 mg/kg ww, while Table 4 includes 3.7, 12, and 13 plus the 0.097 neck-tissue control.
  • Table 1 literature-review rows are recorded only as transported context and are not treated as this source’s own occurrence dataset.
  • Speciation: the source concerns metallic elemental lead fragments and dissolved/bioaccessible lead compounds from those fragments. No arsenic, mercury, chromium, or organotin speciation is involved.
  • Brand firewall: ammunition model names printed in table headings and methods were not attached to contamination values on this page. Instrument and laboratory details are scientific-method context.
  • Frontmatter slugs were checked against docs/gpt-collaboration/taxonomy-snapshot.md. The taxonomy has game-meats as a product slug but lacks exact wild-boar-meat or game-meat ingredient slugs, so ingredients route through broad meat, meat-and-poultry, and organ-meats.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c32026-08-04major1 section added
3171d069e2026-08-02major1 section added
90a2f9a382026-07-30major1 section added and 1 removed; narrative text revised
eaa8eeeed2026-07-27major1 section added
50de6ab212026-07-27minorNarrative text revised