Overview
Qvarfort and Holmgren measured total lead and simulated gastrointestinal release of lead from metallic fragments in wild-boar tissues collected around bullet wound channels. The study is not a representative market-occurrence survey; it deliberately sampled the most contaminated wound-channel tissues so that metallic-lead dissolution could be tested. It is useful as game-meat lead-fragment bioaccessibility context, with its measured tissue lead values kept on the source’s mg/kg ww basis.
Key numbers
- Article identity: Journal of Analytical Techniques and Research
7, pages09-22, DOI10.26502/jatr.47; the PDF prints receivedDecember 18, 2024, acceptedDecember 26, 2025, and publishedFebruary 11, 2025. - Object 1: male wild boar (Sus scrofa), live weight
45.5 kg, shooting distance75 metres, calibre6.5 -284, muzzle velocity890 m/sec, calculated impact velocity840 m/sec, bullet weight9.1 grams (140grs). - Object 2: female wild boar (Sus scrofa), live weight
72 kg, shooting distance25 metres, calibre6,5x55, muzzle velocity870 m/sec, calculated impact velocity845 m/sec, bullet weight10.1 grams (156 grs), bullet entranceLeft side, 3th rib, bullet exitRight side, 4th rib. - Study design: samples were taken from a
9 centimeterswound-channel diameter and from a6.5 centimetersradius around the wound-channel center, plus chest-wall, lung, and heart tissues; sample weights were20 to 120 gram. - CT/radiography context: the authors state that lead fragments smaller than
1/10 millimeterwere observable in high magnification images and that Figure 3 showed maximum lead-fragment distance through bloodstreams in the chest cavity of134 mmfor Object 1. - Overall source summary: total mean lead content for all samples was
273.6 mg/kg wwforn=17; the source states this high mean reflects deliberate wound-channel sampling rather than normal edible-meat sampling. - Source-side bioaccessibility summary: the Results section states that bioaccessible lead varied between
0.13 to 2%with mean0.98 %, but Table 4 includes one2.38percent value; the abstract and Summary also describe the bioaccessible part as less than2%in most samples and report mean0.5%.
Table 3, Object 1 wound-channel and nearby tissue samples:
| Sample | Total lead (mg/kg ww) | In vitro gastrointestinal and intestinal (mg/kg ww) | Bioaccessible part (% of total lead) | Source location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | 131 | 0.54 | 0.41 | Centre wound channel, entrance |
| I2 | 72.39 | 1.12 | 1.55 | r= 3 cm I |
| I3 | 341 | 1.09 | 0.32 | r= 3 cm II |
| I4 | 221 | 2.03 | 0.92 | Chest wall, entrance |
| U1 | 1955 | 1.25 | 0.06 | Centre wound channel, exit |
| U3 | 84.8 | 0.88 | 1.04 | r= 6.5 cm I |
| U4 | 22.3 | 0.34 | 1.52 | r= 6.5 cm II |
| U6 | 13.8 | 0.06 | 0.43 | r= 10 cm III |
| U7 | 589 | 1.25 | 0.21 | Chest wall, exit |
Table 4, Object 2 wound-channel and nearby tissue samples:
| Sample | Total lead (mg/kg ww) | In vitro gastrointestinal and intestinal (mg/kg ww) | Bioaccessible part (% of total lead) | Source location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In 1 | 58 | 0.83 | 1.43 | Centre wound channel, entrance |
| In 3 | 12 | 0.24 | 2 | r= 6.5 cm II |
| In 4 | 13 | 0,19 | 1.46 | r= 6.5 cm III |
| In 5 | 3.7 | 0.09 | 2.38 | Chest wall, entrance |
| In 6 | 590 | 0.74 | 0.13 | Lung and heart tissue, entrance |
| U1 | 390 | 1.6 | 0.41 | Centre wound channel, exit |
| U3 | 100 | 0.73 | 0.73 | r= 6.5 cm II |
| U5 | 14 | 0.23 | 1.64 | Chest wall, exit |
| U8 | 0.097 | - | - | Control sample, neck tissue |
Table 2, Object 1 gastric-versus-intestinal dissolution check:
| Sample | Total lead (mg/kg ww) | In vitro gastrointestinal (mg/kg ww) | Intestinal (mg/kg ww) | Difference (mg/kg ww) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | 131 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.04 |
| I2 | 72.39 | 1.12 | 1.02 | -0.1 |
| I3 | 341 | 1.09 | 1.01 | -0.08 |
| I4 | 221 | 2.03 | 1.21 | -0.82 |
| U1 | 1955 | 1.25 | 0.89 | -0.36 |
| U3 | 84.8 | 0.88 | 0.62 | -0.26 |
| U4 | 22.3 | 0.34 | 0.23 | -0.11 |
| U6 | 13.8 | 0.06 | 0.04 | -0.04 |
| U7 | 589 | 1.25 | 1.17 | -0.08 |
Table 5, lead-shot-only gastrointestinal simulation:
| Statistic/sample | Gastric juice (%) | Intestinal juice (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | 0.64 | <0.05 |
| Sample 2 | 0.29 | <0.05 |
| Sample 3 | 0.74 | <0.05 |
| Sample 4 | 0.35 | <0.05 |
| Sample 5 | 0.66 | <0.05 |
| Sample 6 | 0.57 | <0.05 |
| Mean value | 0.61 | - |
| Median | 0.54 | - |
Methods (brief)
The authors CT-scanned deep-frozen, uneviscerated wild boars in natural posture, then used CT and high-resolution radiography to locate lead fragments around the wound channel and in chest-cavity tissues. Semi-thawed samples were homogenized into a meat paste, flattened into paper molds, frozen, X-rayed, and divided so one portion could be analyzed for total lead and the second could undergo in vitro gastrointestinal simulation. Total lead was measured after heating samples at 4500 C for 12 hours, leaching ash with 7M HNO3, autoclaving at 200 kPa (120°C) for 30 minutes, and analyzing by SS 028150-2/ ICP-MS and SS 028150-2/ ICP-AES; procedural blanks were < 0.0005 mg/L. The in vitro simulation used gastric juice adjusted to pH 3, 2.5 hours at 37oC, then intestinal juice adjusted to pH 6.3 for an additional 2 hours at 37oC, followed by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm.
Implications
Certification (HMTc): This source should not be pooled as representative game-meat market occurrence because sampling intentionally targeted wound-channel tissues, which the authors say are normally cut away and discarded. It is useful as C-tier source-pathway context for the fraction of metallic bullet lead that becomes bioaccessible under the study’s in vitro conditions.
Courses: The paper is useful for separating total metallic lead in tissue, bioaccessible lead released during digestion, and bioavailable lead absorbed by the body. It also illustrates why sample location around a bullet wound channel can dominate measured game-meat lead values.
App: The source can support explanatory game-meat cards about lead-fragment dissolution, while warning that wound-channel samples are not the same as ordinary retail or served portions.
Wiki pages this source may touch
- Lead
- Meat and poultry
- Meat and Poultry
- Organ Meats (Kidney and Liver)
- Game meats (venison, bison, rabbit)
- EFSA — Lead in Food (2010), No-Threshold Position
Verification notes
- PDF text was extracted with
pdftotext -layoutto/tmp/mfk_june8_583.txt; the article identity block, Summary, CT/sample-collection methods, lead-analysis methods, in vitro simulation methods, Tables 1-5, Results and Discussion, Summing up, and references were checked against this page. - DOI
10.26502/jatr.47, title text, raw handleMFK_lead-in-game-meat-a-study-of-bioaccessibility, and candidate cite-keyqvarfort2025-game-meat-lead-bioaccessibilitywere searched before creation; no existing source page was found. - Numerical values are copied without unit conversion. Table 4 preserves the source’s printed decimal comma in
0,19; Table 5 preserves<0.05. - Source-internal inconsistencies are retained rather than reconciled: the identity block prints an impossible accepted/published sequence; the abstract/Summary say less than
2%and mean0.5%, the Results prose says0.13 to 2% (mean 0.98 %), while Table 4 includes2.38; Results prose says Object 2 total lead ranges14to590 mg/kg ww, while Table 4 includes3.7,12, and13plus the0.097neck-tissue control. - Table 1 literature-review rows are recorded only as transported context and are not treated as this source’s own occurrence dataset.
- Speciation: the source concerns metallic elemental lead fragments and dissolved/bioaccessible lead compounds from those fragments. No arsenic, mercury, chromium, or organotin speciation is involved.
- Brand firewall: ammunition model names printed in table headings and methods were not attached to contamination values on this page. Instrument and laboratory details are scientific-method context.
- Frontmatter slugs were checked against
docs/gpt-collaboration/taxonomy-snapshot.md. The taxonomy hasgame-meatsas a product slug but lacks exactwild-boar-meatorgame-meatingredient slugs, so ingredients route through broadmeat,meat-and-poultry, andorgan-meats.
Update history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.