Skip to content

Qvarfort and Holmgren 2025 - game meat lead bioaccessibility

Qvarfort and Holmgren measured total lead and simulated gastrointestinal release of lead from metallic fragments in wild-boar tissues collected around bullet wound channels. The study is not a representative market-occurrence survey; it deliberately sampled the most contaminated wound-channel tissues so that metallic-lead dissolution could be tested. It is useful as game-meat lead-fragment bioaccessibility context, with its measured tissue lead values kept on the source’s mg/kg ww basis.

Key numbers

  • Article identity: Journal of Analytical Techniques and Research 7, pages 09-22, DOI 10.26502/jatr.47; the PDF prints received December 18, 2024, accepted December 26, 2025, and published February 11, 2025.
  • Object 1: male wild boar (Sus scrofa), live weight 45.5 kg, shooting distance 75 metres, calibre 6.5 -284, muzzle velocity 890 m/sec, calculated impact velocity 840 m/sec, bullet weight 9.1 grams (140grs).
  • Object 2: female wild boar (Sus scrofa), live weight 72 kg, shooting distance 25 metres, calibre 6,5x55, muzzle velocity 870 m/sec, calculated impact velocity 845 m/sec, bullet weight 10.1 grams (156 grs), bullet entrance Left side, 3th rib, bullet exit Right side, 4th rib.
  • Study design: samples were taken from a 9 centimeters wound-channel diameter and from a 6.5 centimeters radius around the wound-channel center, plus chest-wall, lung, and heart tissues; sample weights were 20 to 120 gram.
  • CT/radiography context: the authors state that lead fragments smaller than 1/10 millimeter were observable in high magnification images and that Figure 3 showed maximum lead-fragment distance through bloodstreams in the chest cavity of 134 mm for Object 1.
  • Overall source summary: total mean lead content for all samples was 273.6 mg/kg ww for n=17; the source states this high mean reflects deliberate wound-channel sampling rather than normal edible-meat sampling.
  • Source-side bioaccessibility summary: the Results section states that bioaccessible lead varied between 0.13 to 2% with mean 0.98 %, but Table 4 includes one 2.38 percent value; the abstract and Summary also describe the bioaccessible part as less than 2% in most samples and report mean 0.5%.

Table 3, Object 1 wound-channel and nearby tissue samples:

SampleTotal lead (mg/kg ww)In vitro gastrointestinal and intestinal (mg/kg ww)Bioaccessible part (% of total lead)Source location
I11310.540.41Centre wound channel, entrance
I272.391.121.55r= 3 cm I
I33411.090.32r= 3 cm II
I42212.030.92Chest wall, entrance
U119551.250.06Centre wound channel, exit
U384.80.881.04r= 6.5 cm I
U422.30.341.52r= 6.5 cm II
U613.80.060.43r= 10 cm III
U75891.250.21Chest wall, exit

Table 4, Object 2 wound-channel and nearby tissue samples:

SampleTotal lead (mg/kg ww)In vitro gastrointestinal and intestinal (mg/kg ww)Bioaccessible part (% of total lead)Source location
In 1580.831.43Centre wound channel, entrance
In 3120.242r= 6.5 cm II
In 4130,191.46r= 6.5 cm III
In 53.70.092.38Chest wall, entrance
In 65900.740.13Lung and heart tissue, entrance
U13901.60.41Centre wound channel, exit
U31000.730.73r= 6.5 cm II
U5140.231.64Chest wall, exit
U80.097--Control sample, neck tissue

Table 2, Object 1 gastric-versus-intestinal dissolution check:

SampleTotal lead (mg/kg ww)In vitro gastrointestinal (mg/kg ww)Intestinal (mg/kg ww)Difference (mg/kg ww)
I11310.540.580.04
I272.391.121.02-0.1
I33411.091.01-0.08
I42212.031.21-0.82
U119551.250.89-0.36
U384.80.880.62-0.26
U422.30.340.23-0.11
U613.80.060.04-0.04
U75891.251.17-0.08

Table 5, lead-shot-only gastrointestinal simulation:

Statistic/sampleGastric juice (%)Intestinal juice (%)
Sample 10.64<0.05
Sample 20.29<0.05
Sample 30.74<0.05
Sample 40.35<0.05
Sample 50.66<0.05
Sample 60.57<0.05
Mean value0.61-
Median0.54-

Methods (brief)

The authors CT-scanned deep-frozen, uneviscerated wild boars in natural posture, then used CT and high-resolution radiography to locate lead fragments around the wound channel and in chest-cavity tissues. Semi-thawed samples were homogenized into a meat paste, flattened into paper molds, frozen, X-rayed, and divided so one portion could be analyzed for total lead and the second could undergo in vitro gastrointestinal simulation. Total lead was measured after heating samples at 4500 C for 12 hours, leaching ash with 7M HNO3, autoclaving at 200 kPa (120°C) for 30 minutes, and analyzing by SS 028150-2/ ICP-MS and SS 028150-2/ ICP-AES; procedural blanks were < 0.0005 mg/L. The in vitro simulation used gastric juice adjusted to pH 3, 2.5 hours at 37oC, then intestinal juice adjusted to pH 6.3 for an additional 2 hours at 37oC, followed by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm.

Implications

Certification (HMTc): This source should not be pooled as representative game-meat market occurrence because sampling intentionally targeted wound-channel tissues, which the authors say are normally cut away and discarded. It is useful as C-tier source-pathway context for the fraction of metallic bullet lead that becomes bioaccessible under the study’s in vitro conditions.

Courses: The paper is useful for separating total metallic lead in tissue, bioaccessible lead released during digestion, and bioavailable lead absorbed by the body. It also illustrates why sample location around a bullet wound channel can dominate measured game-meat lead values.

App: The source can support explanatory game-meat cards about lead-fragment dissolution, while warning that wound-channel samples are not the same as ordinary retail or served portions.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • PDF text was extracted with pdftotext -layout to /tmp/mfk_june8_583.txt; the article identity block, Summary, CT/sample-collection methods, lead-analysis methods, in vitro simulation methods, Tables 1-5, Results and Discussion, Summing up, and references were checked against this page.
  • DOI 10.26502/jatr.47, title text, raw handle MFK_lead-in-game-meat-a-study-of-bioaccessibility, and candidate cite-key qvarfort2025-game-meat-lead-bioaccessibility were searched before creation; no existing source page was found.
  • Numerical values are copied without unit conversion. Table 4 preserves the source’s printed decimal comma in 0,19; Table 5 preserves <0.05.
  • Source-internal inconsistencies are retained rather than reconciled: the identity block prints an impossible accepted/published sequence; the abstract/Summary say less than 2% and mean 0.5%, the Results prose says 0.13 to 2% (mean 0.98 %), while Table 4 includes 2.38; Results prose says Object 2 total lead ranges 14 to 590 mg/kg ww, while Table 4 includes 3.7, 12, and 13 plus the 0.097 neck-tissue control.
  • Table 1 literature-review rows are recorded only as transported context and are not treated as this source’s own occurrence dataset.
  • Speciation: the source concerns metallic elemental lead fragments and dissolved/bioaccessible lead compounds from those fragments. No arsenic, mercury, chromium, or organotin speciation is involved.
  • Brand firewall: ammunition model names printed in table headings and methods were not attached to contamination values on this page. Instrument and laboratory details are scientific-method context.
  • Frontmatter slugs were checked against docs/gpt-collaboration/taxonomy-snapshot.md. The taxonomy has game-meats as a product slug but lacks exact wild-boar-meat or game-meat ingredient slugs, so ingredients route through broad meat, meat-and-poultry, and organ-meats.

Page history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateDescription
4039d202026-06-10scope: broaden ingest to the full upstream+downstream literature (marine, atmospheric, attribution, exposure, toxicology) — inclusion is the default