Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Addition of nickel (Ni) and Mo as an Effort to Increase Ethanol in Palm Oil Wastewater Treatment

Overview

Gumilar and colleagues tested whether nickel and molybdenum additions changed ethanol formation during anaerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent. This is in-scope supply-chain wastewater-treatment and trace-metal-addition context: it reports POME metal concentrations and metal dosing in a treatment process, but it is not palm-oil occurrence evidence and it does not report heavy-metal removal.

Key numbers

Table 2 reports the starting palm oil mill effluent characteristics. All units are mg/L except pH:

ParameterValue
Total COD30367
BOD14500
Soluble COD18433
pH4,3
Oil and grease630
Ammonia (NH3)26,77
Nitrogen total265,67
Total suspended solids (TSS)6200
Volatile suspended solids (VSS)3967
Ethanol44,4
Volatile fatty acids (VFA’s)566,67
Iron (Fe)14,96
Manganese (Mn)2,09
Molybdenum (Mo)< 0,001
Nickel (Ni)0,025
Copper (Cu)0,073
Zinc (Zn)0,051

Table 1 defines the nine reactor conditions:

Run/reactorNi added (mg/L)Mo added (mg/L)
Control00
Reactor A01
Reactor B03
Reactor C0.250
Reactor D0.251
Reactor E0.253
Reactor F0.50
Reactor G0.51
Reactor H0.53

The abstract reports that reactor E, with Mo 3 mg/L and nickel (Ni) 0.25 mg/L, produced the highest ethanol concentration at 578.44 mgCOD/L. The highest COD removal occurred in reactor D, with Mo 1 mg/L and Ni 0.25 mg/L, at 23.4%.

Table 6 reports anaerobic products after treatment:

ReactorEthanol (mgCOD/L)Acetate (mgCOD/L)Propionate (mgCOD/L)Butyrate (mgCOD/L)Valerate (mgCOD/L)VSS (mg/L)COD aq (mg/L)pH
Control320.523815.73844.812305.08291.664296165204.79
A416.784315.811056.532073.49251.664222143685.13
B399.394118.81962.122319.98231.834192148865.66
C480.114961.03878.252078.94382.514371149534.98
D510.214228.451056.622202.60248.334491141195.19
E578.444199.521037.442168.87283.614264143685.28
F511.243819.33886.732274.72272.624517150275.21
G521.684972.57916.281954.31318.54291148924.89
H520.884281.65821.732175.13300.254028151205.36

The authors report that the ANOVA significance value for ethanol production was 0.000, interpreted as a significant difference among reactor conditions. They state that the highest degree of ethanofication was 0.031 in reactor E, while other reactors ranged from 0.017 to 0.028. Degree of acidification ranged from 0.394 to 0.450, with the smallest value in the control reactor.

Methods (brief)

The study used laboratory-scale anaerobic batch reactors with 5 L working volume. Palm oil mill effluent was collected from PT Condong Garut, Indonesia. Biomass was sludge of POME mixed with cow rumen at 50:50 (v/v) and acclimated to the wastewater. Reactors were flushed with nitrogen at 1 L/min for the first 24 h and then operated with internal biogas circulation until 72 h at 25 +/- 2 degrees C. Initial pH was adjusted to 6.5-7.0, and reactors were filled with POME and biomass at 4:1 (v/v). Nickel was added as NiSO4.6H2O and molybdenum as (NH4)6Mo7O24.4H2O. Soluble COD, pH, and VSS followed Standard Methods; volatile fatty acids were measured by HPLC; ethanol was measured by GC.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c32026-08-04major1 section added
3171d069e2026-08-02major1 section added
90a2f9a382026-07-30major1 section added and 1 removed; narrative text revised
eaa8eeeed2026-07-27major1 section added
50de6ab212026-07-27minorNarrative text revised