Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Lead and Cadmium in Vinyl Children's Products: A Greenpeace Exposé

Overview

This 70-page Greenpeace USA report by Joseph Di Gangi, PhD, published October 1997 and archived in the U.S. Department of Education’s ERIC database as document ED 414 034, is the catalyst report that prompted both the November 1997 U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission staff response (CPSC Staff Report on Lead and Cadmium in Children's Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Products) and the parallel Health Canada investigation cited there. Greenpeace’s investigators bought 131 PVC consumer products at national chain stores in Chicago, Illinois, then expanded the Chicago lead-positive subset to representative samples in nine other US cities (Boston, Boulder, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, New Orleans, New York, Portland OR, San Francisco, Seattle, Washington DC) and one Canadian city (Montreal, Quebec). Total lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) were measured by atomic-absorption spectroscopy at Stat Analysis (Chicago), 0.07 N HCl extractability of Pb was measured on three commonly-mouthed items using CPSC’s own ASTM-derived protocol, and seven children’s items were subjected to four weeks of UV-A-only accelerated weathering at the Environmental Quality Institute (UNC-Asheville) per the CPSC weatherometer specification (ASTM G53 without condensation) to quantify Pb and Cd dust released onto product surfaces during aging. The investigation found that 28 of 131 Chicago items (~21%) contained ≥100 ppm Pb, 24 of those 28 (86%) exceeded the CPSC staff-recommended 200-ppm vinyl-miniblind limit, more than half exceeded the 1978 CPSC 600-ppm paint-Pb regulatory limit, and every Pb-positive item also contained varying levels of Cd. Greenpeace’s framing — built around the Proposition 65 0.5 µg Pb/day and 0.05 µg Cd/day inhalation thresholds rather than the CPSC chronic-ingestion 15 µg Pb/day and 9.2 µg Cd/day limits — concluded that hazardous Pb and Cd levels were widely present in vinyl children’s products and recommended that the CPSC prohibit Pb and Cd in PVC consumer products, that the State of California pursue Proposition 65 enforcement, and that retailers, trademark licensors, and the plastics industry stop marketing vinyl children’s products.

Key numbers

Sampling frame and screening (pp. 4–5, 11)

  • Total products sampled in Chicago: 131 PVC consumer items purchased at national chain stores.
  • Chicago Pb-positive items (≥100 ppm Pb by AAS of acid-digested PVC): 28 (~21% of the 131 surveyed). Table 1 lists all 28 by product type, store, and Pb/Cd ppm.
  • Chicago Pb-positive items exceeding the 200-ppm CPSC staff-recommended vinyl-miniblind limit: 24 of 28 (≈86% of the Pb-positive subset; ≈18% of the 131 sampled, per the Summary bullet “Eighteen percent of the products examined violated the limit advocated by the Consumer Product Safety Commission staff for vinyl miniblinds”).
  • Chicago Pb-positive items exceeding the 1978 CPSC 600-ppm Pb-in-paint limit (16 CFR 1303): >50% of the Pb-positive subset.
  • Cd analysis trigger: items >100 ppm Pb were re-tested for Cd at Stat Analysis. Greenpeace reports that “all of the lead-containing products contained varying levels of cadmium.”
  • Cev (coefficient of variation) for replicate samples: 9% Pb and 22% Cd (Chicago duplicates); 14% Pb and 16% Cd (California duplicates); 14% Pb and 15% Cd (Montreal duplicates).

Chicago Pb and Cd content by product (Table 1; ppm by weight of PVC plastic, average of duplicates)

Table 1 lists 28 lead-positive vinyl items purchased in Chicago. Selected values illustrating the range:

  • Backpacks: Minnie’s Spring Fever (Disney) Pb 163, Cd 224.5; 101 Dalmations (Kmart) Pb 104, Cd 321.0; Barbie (Kmart) Pb 372, Cd 75.7.
  • Cables: Sega Controller (Toys R Us) Pb 4,100, Cd 17.4; Gemini 3’ video coaxial (Kmart) Pb 7,505, Cd 10.3; Gemini modular phone cord (Kmart) Pb 865, Cd 15.3; Philco in-ear headphones (Kmart) Pb 3,770, Cd 11.0; Philco over-ear headphones (Kmart) Pb 3,490, Cd 52.4; AT&T 25’ phone-line cord (Kmart) Pb 213, Cd 6.5; Gemini computer-printer cord (Kmart) Pb 5,765, Cd 18.1.
  • Bag- and accessory-format items: Disney Minnie Totes key ring (Target) Pb 1,430, Cd 6.1; Fun-d-Mentals pencil case (Kmart) Pb 197, Cd 25.6; Pacific Kids purse (Wal-Mart) Pb 349, Cd 104.8; Tweety totebag (Wal-Mart) Pb 459, Cd 228.5; Toteables cosmetics pouch (Target) Pb 392, Cd 152.0.
  • Vinyl placemats: Warner Bros. Space Jam (Kmart) Pb 178, Cd 7.9; Barth & Dreyfuss (Kmart) Pb 398, Cd 6.2; Gloria Vanderbilt (Wal-Mart) Pb 505, Cd 12.0.
  • Vinyl clothing: Warner Bros. Tweety rain hat (Warner Bros. store) Pb 4,060, Cd 35.4; Columbia Youth Parka raincoat (Uncle Dan’s) Pb 22,550, Cd 47.9.
  • Toys, fitness, and household: 2-lb vinyl-covered barbell (Target) Pb 7,050, Cd 12.4; Medela breast-milk cooler (Target) Pb 375, Cd 29.3; Springs Bath shower curtain (Wal-Mart) Pb 864, Cd 105.5; Barbie Slumber tent pole (Toys R Us) Pb 6,105, Cd 14.6; Looney Tunes hackey sack toy (Toys R Us) Pb 1,610, Cd nd; Kentucky Fried Chicken kid’s-meal food toy (Toys R Us) Pb 207, Cd 344.0; Dimples doll-stroller toy (Toys R Us) Pb 7,115, Cd 22.6; Looney Tunes children’s umbrella (Toys R Us) Pb 817, Cd 27.0.
  • Highest Pb value in Table 1 (Chicago): 22,550 ppm (Columbia Youth Parka raincoat). Table 4 reports a higher single-city specimen at 28,600 ppm Pb for the Columbia rain coat (10-city replication high) and Table 3 reports 18,750 ppm Pb for Columbia rain pants in Montreal, so the absolute dataset-wide Pb peak across Tables 1–4 is the 28,600 ppm Columbia rain coat reading.
  • Highest Cd value in Table 1 (Chicago): 344.0 ppm (Kentucky Fried Chicken kid’s-meal food toy). Table 2 reports higher California specimens: KFC food toy in Los Angeles 649.0 ppm Cd, 101 Dalmations backpack in San Francisco 499.0 ppm Cd, Springs Bath shower curtain in San Francisco 425.0 ppm Cd — so the absolute dataset-wide Cd peak across Tables 1–3 is the 649.0 ppm KFC LA reading.

California replication (Table 2; LA and SF, ppm)

Table 2 reports 17/26 California items (seventeen products, 26 sample rows) purchased in both Los Angeles and San Francisco. Selected values:

  • Backpacks: Minnie’s Spring Fever (Disney; LA Pb 263 Cd 242.0; SF Pb 255 Cd 238.5); 101 Dalmations (Kmart; LA Pb 226 Cd 499.0; SF Pb 288 Cd 440.0); Barbie (Kmart SF) Pb 417 Cd 242.0.
  • Cables: Gemini 3’ video coaxial (Kmart LA Pb 4,910 Cd 9.6; Kmart SF Pb 6,965 Cd 24.3); Gemini modular phone cord (Kmart LA Pb 679 Cd 6.8; Kmart SF Pb 5,290 Cd 36.7); Philco in-ear headphones (Kmart LA Pb 5,910 Cd 5.6; Kmart SF Pb 4,700 Cd 27.3).
  • Tent poles, hats, and bath: Barbie Slumber tent pole (Toys R Us LA Pb 4,685 Cd 11.8; Toys R Us SF Pb 7,400 Cd 8.3); Tweety rain hat (Warner Bros. LA Pb 2,755 Cd 39.0; Warner Bros. SF Pb 2,835 Cd 51.5); Springs Bath shower curtain (Wal-Mart SF) Pb 477 Cd 425.0.
  • Mouthed/toy items: Looney Tunes hackey sack (Toys R Us LA Pb 316 Cd 45.1; Toys R Us SF Pb 1,675 Cd 53.9); Kentucky Fried Chicken food toy (Toys R Us LA Pb 125 Cd 649.0; Toys R Us SF Pb 110 Cd 363.5); Looney Tunes umbrella (Toys R Us LA Pb 656 Cd 46.7; Toys R Us SF Pb 695 Cd 50.3).
  • >80% of California items exceeded the 200-ppm CPSC staff-recommended Pb limit (Greenpeace’s summary).
  • None of the California-purchased products carried Proposition 65 warning labels about Pb or Cd presence.

Canada replication (Table 3; Montreal, Quebec, ppm)

Eight Pb-positive items from a 13-item Montreal pilot:

  • 101 Dalmations backpack (Toys R Us) Pb 110, Cd 55.0.
  • Barbie backpack (Toys R Us) Pb 610, Cd 4.0.
  • 2-lb vinyl-covered barbell (Sports Experts) Pb 247, Cd 29.0.
  • Sega Controller cable (Toys R Us) Pb 5,415, Cd 6.0.
  • Black waterproof jacket (Zellers) Pb 234, Cd 143.0.
  • Minnie Mouse Suite 100 poncho (Wal-Mart) Pb 99, Cd 46.0.
  • Columbia raincoat (Sports Experts) Pb 18,600, Cd 8.0.
  • Columbia rain pants (Sports Experts) Pb 18,750, Cd 18.0.
  • Half of the Montreal items violated Canada’s then-current 600 ppm limit for Pb in consumer products (the source notes Health Canada was proposing a 15 ppm limit in May 1997).

10-city US nationwide Pb survey (Table 4; ppm Pb, average across cities)

A 19-item representative sample of the Chicago Pb-positive items was purchased in Boston (MA), Boulder (CO), Chicago (IL), Los Angeles (CA), Minneapolis (MN), New Orleans (LA), New York (NY), Portland (OR), San Francisco (CA), Seattle (WA), and Washington (DC), plus the Montreal Pb tests for cross-reference. Selected high-Pb items by average:

  • Columbia rain coat: average Pb 23,211 ppm; low 16,800; high 28,600; n=9 across Bos/Chi/LA/Mon/Por/SF; Cev 15%.
  • Gemini 3’ video coaxial cable: average Pb 6,803 ppm; low 4,250; high 12,600; n=17; Cev 30%.
  • Barbie Slumber tent pole: average Pb 5,962 ppm; low 2,830; high 12,500; n=17; Cev 41%.
  • Sega Genesis cable: average Pb 5,045 ppm; low 2,490; high 7,160; n=15; Cev 21%.
  • 2-lb vinyl barbell: average Pb 5,271 ppm; low 824; high 8,610; n=6; Cev 67%.
  • Philco in-ear headphones cable: average Pb 4,845 ppm; low 3,610; high 6,150; n=13; Cev 18%.
  • AT&T phone line cord: average Pb 4,203 ppm; low 207; high 7,260; n=6; Cev 76%.
  • Looney Tunes hackey sack: average Pb 1,774 ppm; low 190; high 7,490; n=8; Cev 136% (highest among all items).
  • Barbie backpack: average Pb 417 ppm; low 236; high 627; n=8; Cev 33%.
  • Disney Minnie key ring: average Pb 836 ppm; low 234; high 1,570; n=4; Cev 83%.
  • Seventeen of the 19 nationwide items exceeded the 200-ppm CPSC staff-recommended Pb limit on average.

Mouthing/chewing-surrogate Pb migration (Table 5; 0.07 N HCl extraction of 250 mg material per ASTM-F963-style CPSC protocol; pp. 17, 32)

For a 250 mg (0.00881 oz) test portion incubated with 50× volume 0.07 N HCl at 37 °C for sequential 1-, 2-, and 3-hour fractions (6 h total exposure):

  • Gemini modular phone cord (Kmart, Chicago): 21.6 µg Pb released.
  • Disney Minnie Totes key ring (Target, Chicago): 34.2 µg Pb released.
  • Kentucky Fried Chicken kid’s-meal food toy (Toys R Us, Chicago): 23.0 µg Pb released.
  • All three exceeded the CPSC 15 µg Pb/day chronic-ingestion limit at ≈1/100 oz (≈280 mg) ingestion (PDF p.17, “swallowing less than one-hundredth of an ounce of either a Gemini phone cord, Disney key ring, or Kentucky Fried Chicken toy would exceed the exposure limit used by the Consumer Product Safety Commission”).
  • All three exceeded the California Proposition 65 0.5 µg Pb/day limit by more than four-fold even at ≈1/1,000 oz (≈25 mg) ingestion (PDF p.17, “Even swallowing less than one-thousandth of an ounce would release more than four times the amount of lead legally permitted under California’s Proposition 65”).

New-product surface-Pb and surface-Cd dust (Table 6; ICP/GFAAS µg released; pp. 18–19, 33–34)

Seven new vinyl children’s products were wiped with one Pace Wipe (10 strokes) “right out of the package” and analysed by graphite-furnace atomic-absorption spectrometry. Average exposure (mean of triplicates) per product, with product area in parentheses:

  • Minnie’s Spring Fever backpack (Disney; LA; 96 in²): Pb 1.984 µg; Cd nd.
  • 101 Dalmations backpack (Kmart; LA; 290 in²): Pb 19.430 µg; Cd 1.740 µg.
  • Barbie backpack (Kmart; SF; 290 in²): Pb 14.210 µg; Cd 1.160 µg.
  • Columbia rain coat (Columbia; Portland OR; 1,700 in²): Pb 235.733 µg; Cd nd.
  • Tweety rain hat (Warner Bros.; LA; 79 in²): Pb 9.217 µg; Cd nd.
  • Barbie Slumber tent pole (Toys R Us; SF; 36 in²): Pb 13.404 µg; Cd nd.
  • Tweety totebag (Wal-Mart; Chi; 240 in²): Pb 0.240 µg; Cd nd.
  • Six of seven new-product Pb values exceeded the California Proposition 65 0.5 µg Pb/day limit by 4- to 470-fold.
  • 101 Dalmations and Barbie backpacks released both Pb (≥14 µg) and Cd (≥1.1 µg) — Cd already exceeded the 0.05 µg/day Proposition 65 inhalation limit by 23 to 35-fold on the new product.

Maximum surface-Pb and surface-Cd dust after four weeks of accelerated aging (Table 7; µg; pp. 20, 33–34)

Same seven products subjected to alternating 6 h UV-A illumination at 50 °C and 6 h dark at room temperature in a custom weatherometer (ASTM G53 specification without condensation, UVCON-compatible UV-A lamps from Atlas Electric Devices Co.) for four weeks; weekly wipes analysed by GFAAS:

  • Minnie’s Spring Fever backpack (Disney; LA): max Pb 5.664 µg; max Cd 5.792 µg.
  • 101 Dalmations backpack (Kmart; LA): max Pb 19.430 µg; max Cd 14.307 µg.
  • Barbie backpack (Kmart; SF): max Pb 35.380 µg; max Cd 23.393 µg.
  • Columbia rain coat (Columbia; Por): max Pb 336.033 µg; Cd nd.
  • Tweety rain hat (Warner Bros.; LA): max Pb 9.217 µg; max Cd 0.263 µg.
  • Barbie Slumber tent pole (Toys R Us; SF): max Pb 302.484 µg; Cd ND (not determined).
  • Tweety totebag (Wal-Mart; Chi): max Pb 8.800 µg; max Cd 15.520 µg.
  • All seven aged-product Pb values exceeded the Proposition 65 0.5 µg/day limit; the Columbia rain coat exceeded it by >600-fold.
  • All six measurable Cd aged-product values exceeded the Proposition 65 0.05 µg/day inhalation limit by 5- to 460-fold.

Statistical worst-case 90th-percentile aged-product exposures (Table 8; µg; pp. 21, 33–34)

Greenpeace calculated the 90th-percentile aged-product exposure by adding (z₁.₂₈ × sample SD) to the Table 7 mean (assuming normal distribution of the triplicate measurements):

  • Minnie’s Spring Fever backpack: Pb 14.824 µg; Cd 6.678 µg.
  • 101 Dalmations backpack: Pb 24.284 µg; Cd 15.852 µg.
  • Barbie backpack: Pb 83.692 µg; Cd 35.840 µg.
  • Columbia rain coat: Pb 590.554 µg; Cd nd.
  • Tweety rain hat: Pb 12.415 µg; Cd 0.497 µg.
  • Barbie Slumber tent pole: Pb 486.925 µg; Cd ND.
  • Tweety totebag: Pb 20.495 µg; Cd 16.762 µg.
  • The most-hazardous 10% of Columbia rain coats would deliver ≈1,200× the Proposition 65 Pb limit and 40× the CPSC chronic-ingestion limit.
  • The most-hazardous 10% of Barbie tent poles would deliver ≈970× the Proposition 65 Pb limit.
  • Five products combined Pb (25- to 170-fold the Proposition 65 limit) and Cd (10- to 335-fold the Proposition 65 inhalation limit) on the same aged surface.

Regulatory comparators reproduced from the report (p. 13 inline table)

  • Consumer Product Safety Commission (federal): Pb 600 ppm in paint (16 CFR 1303, 1978); Pb 200 ppm proposed by CPSC staff for vinyl miniblinds (1996, not adopted as a binding standard); Cd not regulated.
  • State of California (Proposition 65 / Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986): Pb 0.5 µg/day maximum allowable dose (MAD) as a reproductive/developmental toxicant; Cd 0.05 µg/day no-significant-risk-level (NSRL) for inhalation as a carcinogen.

Methods (brief)

Total Pb and Cd content (Stat Analysis, Chicago, IL; AIHA proficient, NIST/NVLAP accredited; supervised by Benjamin Ruth, PhD). Samples ashed in a Thermolyne 48000 muffle furnace at 480 °C for 2 h to homogenise; aqueous acid digestion per AOAC 5.001-3 (HNO₃ / H₂O₂ / HCl); organic digestion per NIOSH 9076 using analytical-grade methylene chloride. Pb and Cd measured by atomic-absorption spectrophotometry on a Varian SpectrAA-200. QA/QC: blanks and matrix spikes every 10 samples; NIST reference standards on each curve. Testing was conducted blind to product identity.

Acid-extractability Pb (Stat Analysis). Per “procedures developed by the Consumer Product Safety Commission” (PDF Appendix V, p.31, citation as stated): a measured test portion of plastic was incubated with 50× mass 0.07 N HCl at 37 °C in the dark with agitation, sequentially decanted and re-extracted at 1, 2, and 3 hours (6 h total exposure). All three fractions combined and analysed. The protocol corresponds methodologically to the ASTM F 963 family, but the source does not make that attribution explicitly.

Accelerated aging and surface-Pb/Cd dust (Environmental Quality Institute, University of North Carolina–Asheville; AIHA-, ELLAP-accredited; supervised by Richard Maas, PhD). Custom weatherometer built to the ASTM G 53 specification without the condensation feature; UV-A lamps (UVCON specification) from Atlas Electric Devices Co., Chicago IL; wavelength 295–365 nm. Samples exposed in triplicate, single-blind, to alternating 6 h cycles: heat-and-light at 50 °C under UV-A, then dark at room temperature without illumination. Samples wiped at weekly intervals for four weeks; one Pace Wipe per sample, 10 strokes; wipes digested and analysed for Pb and Cd content per area wiped. Determinations by graphite-furnace atomic-absorption spectrophotometry (GFAAS) on Thermo-Jarrel-Ash Model 11 or 12 spectrometers with TJA Model 774 graphite atomizers. QA/QC: standard-curve tolerances and standard-additions per all samples.

Study design (Appendix V). Chicago-area items were verified as PVC by the Beilstein chlorine test before total-Pb analysis. Cadmium testing was triggered only for items >100 ppm Pb. The 10-city US replication was a fixed 19-item subsample of the Chicago Pb-positive items; one specimen per item per city. The Montreal replication tested 13 items. The accelerated-aging sub-study used seven children’s items (most purchased in California), submitted in triplicate.

Sample heterogeneity (Appendix V). Sample preparation was reported as “an important determinant of variation”; coefficients of variation across duplicate analyses ranged from 9% (Pb in Chicago duplicates) to 22% (Cd in Chicago duplicates). The Looney Tunes hackey sack had a 136% Cev for Pb across cities, reflecting extreme between-specimen variability in pigment loading.

Implications

  • Regulatory baseline (pre-CPSIA, release-vs-content debate). This report frames PVC children’s-product Pb hazard around (a) total Pb in PVC substrate (against the CPSC staff-recommended 200 ppm vinyl-miniblind limit and the 1978 16 CFR 1303 paint Pb 600 ppm regulatory floor) and (b) accelerated-aging-generated dust Pb measured against California Proposition 65’s 0.5 µg Pb/day MAD. The November 1997 CPSC staff response (CPSC Staff Report on Lead and Cadmium in Children's Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Products) tested 12 of the 18 Greenpeace items it considered “likely to be handled, mouthed, or chewed by young children,” reanalysed Greenpeace’s own Tables 6–8 under a CPSC surface-area-per-day exposure model rather than the Proposition 65 µg/day MAD, and concluded that none of the products posed a “consumer product hazard” under foreseeable use. The 2008 Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) Section 101 substrate Pb content limit for children’s products (currently 100 ppm) supersedes the 1997 release-based framework: by content alone, ≈86% of Greenpeace’s 28 Chicago Pb-positive items would today be banned hazardous substances under the federal substrate limit, regardless of whether dislodgeable Pb under unweathered hand contact reached the CPSC chronic-ingestion threshold.
  • California Proposition 65 enforcement record. This report is one of the early grey-literature catalogues used to support Proposition 65 actions against vinyl-product retailers. Greenpeace’s framing — that California-purchased vinyl items contained Pb and Cd “without Proposition 65 warning labels” — directly supports the Cal. AG / Alameda County DA Lungren/Orloff suit against 12 vinyl-blind retailers cited in Appendix II.
  • HMTc audit implications (Part 2 firewall observed). The dataset documents that, at the 1996–1997 retail snapshot, PVC consumer items intended for or accessible to children carried substrate Pb routinely in the 100–25,000 ppm range and substrate Cd routinely in the 10–650 ppm range. For HMTc certification of vinyl/PVC children’s-product categories, the 2008 CPSIA 100 ppm Pb substrate limit and the EU REACH Annex XVII Pb-in-articles 500 ppm content limit are the relevant regulatory floors; the literature this report contributes is what an HMTc threshold-setting pass would treat as the 1990s baseline against which post-CPSIA progress is measured. This page does not propose HMTc thresholds.
  • App. Not directly relevant to ingredient contamination_profile data because no food-matrix occurrence values are reported. Potentially relevant to a future children’s-article-screening surface that uses material composition (PVC) and product category (raincoats, backpacks, hackey sacks, tent poles, vinyl placemats, soft-plastic toys, phone-cord and headphone cables) as Pb/Cd contamination-likelihood predictors.
  • Courses. Useful primary document for the regulatory-history teaching module on the CPSIA Section 101 substrate-vs-release debate; for the methods module on accelerated-weathering protocols in product safety; and as a case study in NGO laboratory science (independent third-party labs, blind testing, replicate sampling, conservative statistical worst-case framing) that triggered both federal and state regulatory responses.

Update history

No substantive edit history is available in this build. The full commit record is available in git.