Heavy Metal Index
Ask the IndexAboutIndex Pro

CPSC Staff Report on Lead and Cadmium in Children's Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Products

Cite this pageVersion history

Overview

This U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) staff report, dated 21 November 1997 and signed out of CPSC headquarters in Washington, D.C., is the federal regulator’s formal response to the October 1997 Greenpeace report alleging hazardous lead and cadmium levels in popular vinyl children’s products. CPSC staff obtained 12 of the 18 products that Greenpeace had identified as likely to be handled, mouthed, or chewed by young children, screened each colour or component for total lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) by AOAC 974.02 inductively-coupled-plasma emission spectrometry (ICP-ES), then conducted CPSC 30-stroke moist-filter-paper wipes (surface-dislodgeable) and ASTM-F963-style saline and 0.07 N HCl extractions (mouthing and chewing surrogates) on any product whose total concentration exceeded the CPSC screening thresholds (200 ppm Pb, 100 ppm Cd). Four of the eight screened-positive products yielded detectable dislodgeable or extractable Pb or Cd; none of those four produced a calculated daily exposure exceeding CPSC’s chronic-ingestion limits of 15 µg Pb/day or 9.2 µg Cd/day for a 1-year-old. CPSC concluded that none of the tested products posed a lead or cadmium hazard under reasonably foreseeable handling or use and declined to seek corrective action; the report explicitly preserves the gap between Greenpeace’s “hazardous levels are present” framing (substrate content + accelerated weathering) and CPSC’s “no hazardous exposure under foreseeable use” framing (release under unweathered hand-contact and mouthing conditions).

Key numbers

Screening thresholds and toxicity limits (pp. 4, 6–7, 9)

  • Total-content screening thresholds for further testing (p. 4): >200 ppm Pb or >100 ppm Cd in PVC substrate triggered wiping and/or extraction studies. Below these thresholds the product was treated as not posing a foreseeable Pb/Cd exposure hazard.
  • Chronic-ingestion limit for Pb (pp. 5, 9, Table 3): 15 µg Pb/day for children 6 years of age and under. Anchored to keeping blood Pb below the CDC level-of-concern of 10 µg/dL.
  • Chronic-ingestion limit for Cd (pp. 5, 9–10, Table 3): 9.2 µg Cd/day for a 1-year-old, 13.5 µg Cd/day for a 3-year-old, and 20.2 µg Cd/day for a 6-year-old, derived from the U.S. EPA reference dose of 1 µg Cd/kg body weight/day applied to age-specific body weights.
  • CPSC 30-stroke wipe procedure (p. 7): three separate moistened filter papers per product, lightly wiped 10 times each over the test surface (30 strokes total). Each filter is then digested in concentrated nitric acid and analyzed for Pb/Cd; results expressed as µg metal wiped from the surface.
  • Extraction procedure (p. 7): three sequential 1-, 2-, and 3-hour extractions at 37 °C in 50 volumes of either 0.07 N HCl (chewing/ingestion surrogate) or normal saline (mouthing surrogate), per ASTM F 963; maximum 6 hours total exposure. Results expressed as µg metal extracted per gram of plastic.
  • Conservative exposure assumptions when data unavailable (pp. 8–9): 1 filter-paper stroke = 1 child hand stroke; 50 % transfer efficiency of dislodgeable Pb/Cd from hand surface to ingestion pathway; 10 % of a food-toy consumed by chewing/ingestion over 30 days.
  • Analytical detection limits (Table 1 footnote 2): “Not detected” defined as <10 ppm Pb or <50 ppm Cd by AOAC 974.02 ICP-ES.
  • Pre-existing CPSC PVC-miniblind manufacturing guidance limit: 0.02 % (200 ppm) Pb by weight, developed in 1996 for PVC miniblinds specifically. The 1997 report explicitly cautions against applying the 0.02 % limit to other vinyl children’s products because of differences in manufacturing, accessibility, and use environment.
  • Pre-existing 1978 CPSC paint Pb ban: 0.06 % (600 ppm) Pb by weight in paint for consumer use and in surface coatings on children’s articles, 16 C.F.R. Part 1303.

Total Pb and Cd in PVC substrate by product (Table 1; ppm by weight, AOAC 974.02 + ICP-ES)

Eight of the 12 products tested exceeded the screening thresholds of 200 ppm Pb or 100 ppm Cd in at least one component:

  • Barbie Backpack (Pyramid Handbags) — Purple Plastic Heart panel: Cd 290 ppm; Pb not detected. Other panels (pink, purple, blue) Pb/Cd not detected.
  • Modular Phone Cord, Ivory color (Gemini Industries): Pb 910 ppm; Cd not detected.
  • Phone Cord (not named), Ivory color: Pb 110 ppm; Cd not detected. Other colours (white 30 ppm Pb, gray ND).
  • KFC kid’s-meal food toy (Henry Gordy International) — Brown-plastic drumstick: Pb 20 ppm, Cd 510 ppm. Yellow plastic component: Pb ND, Cd 40 ppm. Yellow paint component: Pb 20 ppm, Cd 40 ppm.
  • Barbie Slumber Tent (Ero Industries) — Ivory plastic pole: Pb 5,920 ppm, Cd not detected. Purple plastic 90 ppm Cd; pink plastic 100 ppm Cd.
  • Tweety Totebag — Yellow plastic: Pb 20 ppm, Cd 160 ppm.
  • Hackey Sack (Good Stuff Corp.) — Green plastic: Pb 3,270 ppm; Orange plastic: Pb 6,300 ppm; Blue plastic: Pb 70 ppm; Pink plastic: Pb 50 ppm.
  • Umbrella A (Shaw Creations) — White paint (handle): Pb 50 ppm, Cd 20 ppm; orange/white paint (handle): Pb 80 ppm, Cd 10 ppm; multiple plastic colour panels 20 ppm Pb each.
  • Umbrella B (Shaw Creations) — Light brown plastic 810 ppm Pb; red plastic 720 ppm Pb; orange plastic 750 ppm Pb; dark brown plastic 690 ppm Pb (all Cd ND).
  • Halloween placemat (Barth-Dreyfuss) — multiple colour panels 150–210 ppm Pb, 10 ppm Cd each.
  • Space Jam placemat (Zak Designs) — white plastic 90 ppm Pb; orange composite 120 ppm Pb; green composite 100 ppm Pb (all Cd ND).
  • Ivory vinyl placemat (not named) — 100 ppm Pb, Cd ND.
  • Minnie Mouse key bag (Disney Store) — pink bag: Cd 40 ppm; pink strip and pink latch components Pb/Cd ND.
  • Raincoat (Warner Bros.) — yellow plastic 30 ppm Cd; red composite 50 ppm Cd; yellow composite 40 ppm Cd; blue composite 40 ppm Cd (all Pb ND).

Dislodgeable wipe and extraction results (Table 1; only positive results listed)

  • Modular Phone Cord, Ivory color: wipe dislodgeable Pb 21 µg over a 25.4 cm length (30 strokes); 6-hour 0.07 N HCl extraction yielded 97.8 µg Pb/g (Table 1 footnote 5).
  • KFC food-toy brown drumstick: wipe dislodgeable Cd 0.4 µg over 8 cm²; 6-hour saline extraction 0.72 µg Cd/g; 6-hour 0.07 N HCl extraction 18.6 µg Cd/g.
  • Barbie Slumber Tent ivory plastic pole: wipe dislodgeable Pb 23.2 µg over 52 cm of pole length; HCl extraction not applicable since mouthing not anticipated.
  • Tweety Totebag yellow plastic: 6-hour HCl extraction Cd not detected.
  • Tweety Totebag orange and blue glitter components: 6-hour HCl extraction Pb not detected.
  • Hackey Sack green plastic: 6-hour saline extraction 0.676 µg Pb/g; 6-hour HCl extraction 28.85 µg Pb/g.
  • Hackey Sack orange plastic: 6-hour saline extraction 0.968 µg Pb/g.
  • Barbie Backpack Purple Plastic Heart: 6-hour HCl extraction Cd not detected (despite 290 ppm Cd in substrate).
  • Minnie Mouse pink bag: wipe dislodgeable Cd 0.9 µg over 41 cm² of keyring bag.
  • Warner Bros. raincoat yellow plastic: wipe dislodgeable Cd 5.93 µg over 90 cm² of raincoat surface.

Calculated daily exposures for the four products with detectable dislodgeable or extractable Pb/Cd (Tables 2 and 3)

Worked examples in Table 3 demonstrate the per-day Pb or Cd intake a child would receive under CPSC’s hand-to-mouth and ingestion assumptions:

  • Gemini phone cord (Pb pathway): 10-inch length yielded 0.7 µg Pb/stroke; reaching the 15 µg Pb/day limit would require 43 strokes/day on the cord (or 1 stroke/day over a 430-inch length). Table 2 hazard-assessment entry pairs the 43-strokes/day threshold with a 9.8 µg Pb/day exposure figure (the source does not state the activity assumption underlying the 9.8 µg/day value). CPSC verdict: not hazardous.
  • Barbie tent pole (Pb pathway): unweathered wipe yielded 39 strokes/day to reach the 15 µg Pb/day limit. CPSC verdict: not hazardous because the pole is covered by the tent sheet, not exposed to repeated heat/sunlight, and is handled only during setup and takedown (likely by adults).
  • Hackey Sack green and orange plastic (Pb pathway): assuming a child ingests 10 % of the toy over 30 days, calculated daily Pb intake was 1.92 µg/day (green) and 1.38 µg/day (orange). CPSC verdict: not hazardous.
  • KFC food toy (Cd pathway): brown drumstick weighed 61 g; HCl-extractable Cd 18.6 µg Cd/g; if a child ingests 10 % of the toy over 30 days, calculated daily Cd intake is 18.6 µg/g × 61 g × 10 % / 30 days = 3.8 µg Cd/day. CPSC verdict: not hazardous (below the 9.2 µg Cd/day chronic limit for a 1-year-old).

Weathered-product reanalysis using Greenpeace’s own Tables 6, 7, and 8 (Table 4)

CPSC declined to perform accelerated weathering on the products (citing the products’ typical use environment not involving prolonged sunlight/heat) but reanalyzed Greenpeace’s own weathered dislodgeable Pb/Cd data using CPSC’s exposure model:

  • Greenpeace Table 6 (new, unweathered items): the surface area a child would need to handle daily to reach the 15 µg Pb/day or 9.2 µg Cd/day limit ranged from 80.6 in²/day (Barbie tent pole, Pb) and 216.3 in²/day (Columbia raincoat, Pb) to 30,000 in²/day (Tweety totebag, Pb) and 4,600 in²/day (101 Dalmatian backpack, Cd).
  • Greenpeace Table 7 (artificially weathered items): the surface area a child would need to handle daily dropped to as low as 3.6 in²/day (Barbie tent pole, Pb) and 151.8 in²/day (Columbia raincoat, Pb), but for the Pb pathway most weathered items still required 100s of in²/day (e.g., Minnie backpack 508.5 in²/day Pb; Barbie backpack 245.9 in²/day Pb). For the Cd pathway, the lowest weathered surface-area-per-day were Barbie backpack at 228.1 in²/day and Tweety totebag at 284.5 in²/day.
  • Greenpeace Table 8 (90th-percentile worst-case weathered): smallest surface area at which a child would reach the 15 µg Pb/day or 9.2 µg Cd/day limit was the Barbie tent pole at 2.2 in²/day for Pb (worst weathered-Pb case in the dataset). Other weathered + 10 % worst cases ranged from 86.4 in²/day (Columbia raincoat Pb) to 358.3 in²/day (101 Dalmatian backpack Pb) for Pb; from 148.9 in²/day (Barbie backpack Cd) to 2,924.7 in²/day (Tweety rain hat Cd) for Cd.
  • CPSC concluded that although the surface areas implied by Greenpeace’s worst-case weathered data are small for one product (Barbie tent pole, 2.2 in²/day Pb in Table 8), that product would not be subject to the assumed use pattern: poles are covered by the tent sheet, not repeatedly exposed to heat/sunlight, and are handled by adults during setup and takedown only. None of the six products in the weathered-data tables would be a Pb or Cd hazard under realistic use.

Hazard assessment outcome (Table 2 summary, pp. 8–9)

Of the 26 products in Greenpeace’s Table 1 cleared for public release at the time of the CPSC report:

  • 18 were likely to be handled, mouthed, or chewed by young children;
  • 12 were obtained from retailers; 6 could not be located;
  • 8 of the 12 obtained products exhibited Pb above 200 ppm or Cd above 100 ppm in at least one component (screening threshold exceedance);
  • 4 of those 8 had detectable dislodgeable (wipe) or extractable (saline / HCl) Pb or Cd;
  • 0 of those 4 produced a calculated daily exposure exceeding the 15 µg Pb/day or 9.2 µg Cd/day limit under CPSC’s hand-to-mouth and ingestion assumptions.

Overall CPSC conclusion (p. 6, “Conclusions”): “None of the vinyl children’s products evaluated by CPSC staff are lead or cadmium consumer product hazards.” CPSC took no corrective action. Health Canada is cited as having released a similar finding in an investigation reported 30 October 1997.

Methods (brief)

Total Pb and Cd content. AOAC Method 974.02 acid digestion followed by inductively-coupled-plasma emission spectrometry (ICP-ES); results in ppm by weight of plastic; detection limits 10 ppm Pb, 50 ppm Cd. Each colour or component of each product was disaggregated and analyzed separately.

Surface-dislodgeable Pb/Cd (wipe). CPSC 30-stroke procedure: three separate moistened-filter-papers, each wiped 10 times over the test surface (30 strokes total); filters individually digested in concentrated nitric acid; total dislodgeable metal expressed as µg per surface area wiped (cm² or cm of cord length).

Extractable Pb/Cd (mouthing and chewing surrogates). ASTM F 963-derived procedure: 50-volume aqueous extractant (either normal saline as mouthing surrogate, or 0.07 N HCl as chewing/ingestion surrogate), three sequential extractions at 37 °C for 1, 2, and 3 hours; extractant decanted and replaced after each interval; total exposure up to 6 hours; results expressed as µg metal per gram of plastic.

Hazard model. Conservative exposure assumptions where data were absent: 1 filter-paper stroke = 1 child hand stroke; 50 % transfer efficiency from skin surface to ingestion pathway; 10 % of a food-toy ingested over 30 days. Age-specific Cd limits derived from EPA RfD = 1 µg Cd/kg/day at 1-, 3-, and 6-year-old body weights (yielding 9.2, 13.5, and 20.2 µg Cd/day respectively). Pb limit of 15 µg/day held constant for children ≤6 years (anchored to maintaining blood Pb below the 10 µg/dL CDC level-of-concern).

Weathering. CPSC did not perform weathering on its samples, citing that the categories involved (backpacks, raincoats, umbrellas, placemats, hackey sacks, tent poles, totebags, key bags, phone cords) are not repeatedly exposed to heat and sunlight in foreseeable use, unlike the 1996 PVC miniblind precedent. CPSC reanalyzed Greenpeace’s own weathered Tables 6, 7, and 8 using CPSC’s surface-area-per-day exposure model rather than rejecting the weathered data outright.

Reference comparison. Sole literature citation is Di Gangi, J. 1997. “Lead and cadmium in vinyl children’s products; a Greenpeace expose.” Greenpeace USA, Washington DC. October.

Implications

  • Regulatory baseline (Pb in children’s PVC articles, pre-CPSIA). This report is the federal regulator’s pre-CPSIA-Section-101 framing of Pb in children’s PVC articles: hazard is defined by exposure (dislodgeable/extractable + foreseeable use) rather than by total substrate content. The 200 ppm Pb screening threshold and the 15 µg Pb/day chronic ingestion limit are anchored to maintaining blood Pb < 10 µg/dL, an era-specific CDC level-of-concern that the CDC has since revised downward (to 5 µg/dL in 2012 and 3.5 µg/dL in 2021). Sources citing CPSC’s 1997 hazard-assessment framework should flag the obsolete blood-Pb anchor; the substrate-content vs released-Pb distinction the CPSC drew here was substantively overridden by the 2008 CPSIA, which made total Pb content in any accessible substrate of a children’s product (currently 100 ppm) the operative federal threshold regardless of dislodgeability.
  • Cd assessment framework. The age-specific Cd chronic-ingestion limits (9.2, 13.5, 20.2 µg/day for 1-, 3-, 6-year-olds) derived from EPA RfD = 1 µg Cd/kg body weight/day remain the comparison values U.S. regulators use for product-Cd exposure assessment of children; the CPSC framing here is consistent with later EPA IRIS treatment of Cd as a kidney-damage critical-effect agent.
  • HMTc audit implications. For HMTc children’s-product certification work, this report establishes that 1990s-era PVC articles routinely contained substrate Pb at 700–6,000 ppm and Cd at 100–500 ppm in at least some components without triggering federal corrective action under the era’s release-based hazard framework. The 2008 CPSIA transition to content-based limits (currently 100 ppm Pb in accessible children’s-product substrate) is the regulatory event that retroactively reclassified most of these 1997-tested products as banned hazardous substances. HMTc threshold-setting for vinyl/PVC children’s-product categories should treat the 100 ppm CPSIA substrate limit as the regulatory floor (regulatory-alignment) and reflect the historical context — pre-2008 PVC articles in the supply chain may carry substrate Pb well above the modern limit even where release-based hazard models would not flag them.
  • App. Not directly relevant to ingredient contamination_profile data because no food-matrix occurrence values are reported. Potentially relevant to a future children’s-article-screening surface that flags categories historically associated with PVC + lead/cadmium pigment content (tent poles, hackey sacks, phone cords, totebag glitter, raincoat plastic panels).
  • Courses. Useful primary historical document for the regulatory-history teaching module on the substrate-content-vs-released-metal debate that motivated CPSIA Section 101 a decade later, and as a worked example of CPSC’s hazard-assessment math (surface area × dislodgeable concentration × transfer efficiency × strokes/day). The Greenpeace–CPSC weathering disagreement and the CPSC reanalysis of Greenpeace’s own Tables 6–8 are good case-study material for the methods module on accelerated-weathering protocols in product-safety testing.

Update history

No substantive edit history is available in this build. The full commit record is available in git.

Referenced by