Skip to content

Akhmetsadykova et al. 2013 — Lactic acid bacteria from fermented camel milk protect cavies from lead absorption

Akhmetsadykova and colleagues tested in vivo whether cow milk fermented with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from camel milk and shubat (fermented camel milk) reduces lead absorption in guinea pigs (cavies). Over 28 days, eight treatment groups (n=10 each) received daily oral doses of either water with lead nitrate, fermented milk product (with or without Pb), or controls. Lead was measured in faeces, blood, and five organs by atomic absorption spectrometry after wet mineralization. The paper is methodologically a mechanism study; for HMI it provides limited but useful baseline Pb data on cow milk used in Kazakhstan and an in vivo demonstration that LAB-fermented dairy can act as a biosorbent during gastrointestinal transit.

Key numbers

All concentrations in ppm (mg/kg dry weight after oven-drying at 150 ºC) unless noted. Method: atomic absorption spectrometry (Carl Zeiss AAS 30) after wet mineralization in 65% HNO3 by Kjeldahl method.

Diet baseline (presented by the authors as a single set of values; sample size and replication not specified in the paper):

  • Cow milk used as fermentation vehicle: Pb 0.32 ppm (320 ppb).
  • Drinking water: Pb 0.12 ppm (120 ppb).
  • Fodder: Pb 0.32 ppm (320 ppb).
  • HNO3 reagent: Pb 0.1 ppm.

Treatment groups received 0.5 ppm Pb (as lead nitrate) in 2 mL of either water (Water Pb group) or fermented milk product, daily for 28 days.

Pb in faeces at day 7 (ppm): Control 0.43, 4SF 0.54, 4SFPb 0.63, SF 0.4, SFPb 0.5, SNF 0.47, SNFPb 0.68, Water Pb 0.43. Faecal Pb was consistently higher in fermented-milk-treated groups than in Control and Water Pb groups across the 28-day study, consistent with LAB-mediated luminal binding and excretion.

Pb in organs and blood at day 28, Water Pb group vs Control group (ppm):

  • Spleen: 1.04 vs 0.82.
  • Heart: 0.65 vs 0.20.
  • Kidneys: 0.58 vs 0.58.
  • Blood: 0.46 vs 0.31.
  • Lungs: ~0.60 (Water Pb, read from Figure 3) vs 0.62 (Control, p.277 text).
  • Liver: ~0.55 (Water Pb, read from Figure 3) vs 0.63 (Control, p.277 text).

Groups receiving fermented milk product showed reduced Pb in target organs (spleen, kidneys, liver, lungs) compared to the Water Pb group; the SFPb group had the lowest blood Pb. Pb concentration in heart was significantly correlated with Pb in spleen by Kruskal-Wallis test and PCA.

Methods (brief)

Eighty female cavies (250-300 g; Antigen Ltd, Almaty) were randomized to eight groups (n=10) and dosed orally with 2 mL daily for 28 days. Treatments were Control (no Pb), Water Pb (0.5 ppm Pb as Pb(NO3)2 in water), and six fermented-milk arms varying the LAB strain combination (4SF = four-strain Pb-binding consortium; SF = single Pb-binding strain; SNF = single non-binding strain) crossed with presence or absence of 0.5 ppm Pb spike. The fermentation vehicle was cow milk inoculated with LAB strains isolated from camel milk and shubat. Faeces were collected on days 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28; blood and organs (heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, spleen) were collected at sacrifice on day 28. Samples were pooled within group and tissue, oven-dried at 150 ºC for 1 h, homogenized, and mineralized by wet digestion in 65% HNO3 (Carlo Erba Reagents) using a Kjeldahl block (DK6 VELP SCIENTIFICA). Pb was measured by AAS (Carl Zeiss AAS 30) at KazMekhanObr laboratory, Kazakhstan. Statistics: Kruskal-Wallis on treatment effect, ANOVA on time effect in faeces, PCA on the treatment × organ matrix. Software: XLSTAT 2010. The authors do not report LODs, recoveries, replicates per pooled sample, or CRM use, which limits comparability to occurrence-survey datasets.

Implications

Certification: Provides a single-point baseline Pb value of 320 ppb in cow milk used in a 2010-era Kazakh experimental setting, well above the Codex 20 ppb maximum level for raw milk. The number lacks methodological context (no n, no replicates, no sampling design) and should be treated as a baseline characterization of one batch of vehicle milk rather than as a survey datapoint. The mechanism finding — LAB-fermented milk reduces gastrointestinal Pb absorption — is of interest for any future discussion of dairy processing and bioavailability in milk-and-dairy but is not a contamination-occurrence claim.

Courses: Useful for teaching biosorption mechanisms (LAB cell-wall metal binding), the distinction between food contamination and bioavailability, and the in vivo limitations of animal intervention models when extrapolating to human dietary exposure. Also illustrates why mechanism studies are evidence-tier B for occurrence: even rigorous animal work does not establish food-supply concentration distributions.

App: Not directly informative for ingredient priors. The diet baseline value is a single data point from a non-survey context.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

The PDF filename uses 2012 (submission/received year, 12 April 2012); the paper was published in Emir. J. Food Agric. Vol. 25 Issue 4, December 2012 online with formal 2013 issue dating. Cite-key uses publication year 2013 per HMI convention; raw_handle preserves the discover-skill filename.

The fermentation substrate in this study was cow milk, not camel milk; the camel-milk connection is genealogical (LAB strains were isolated from fermented camel milk / shubat). Frontmatter matrix is therefore cow-milk, not camel-milk or fermented-milk, and the ingredient route is milk-and-dairy rather than a camel-specific ingredient slug.

The 320 ppb Pb in the cow milk diet baseline is unusually high (16× the Codex limit). The paper does not state whether this is one composite sample, replicated, or a literature-imported value. It is presented in a single sentence: “Diet was slightly contaminated: in milk 0.32, water 0.12, and fodder 0.32, HNO3 0.1 ppm of lead was found.” The Key numbers section quotes the value verbatim and flags the missing methods context rather than treating it as a survey-grade measurement.

Organ Pb values for control and water-Pb groups were taken from the abstract narrative (pages 274 and 277). Control-group lungs (0.62) and liver (0.63) values are quoted in the p.277 prose discussing fermented-milk treatment effects; Water-Pb lungs and liver values are approximate (read from Figure 3) since the prose does not quote them.

Lipid- vs water-soluble Pb species, valence state, and any speciation were not assessed; all Pb values are total Pb after acid digestion.

No brand names appear in the source (Part 12 compliant). Method-vendor names (Carl Zeiss, Carlo Erba, VELP, Antigen Ltd, XLSTAT) are reproduced under the methods-vendor exception.

Page history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateDescription
70ae1cc2026-05-30codex sprint 2026-05-30 22:30: end-of-fire cleanup
c329e282026-05-30audit-queue: hasan2021-bangladesh-dairy-trace-elements → audited-revised (REVISE)