Overview
The Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme evaluated aluminium salts used in antiperspirants and deodorants as a public human-health risk assessment. The report does not contain new product testing, but it summarizes SCCS concentration and exposure data for deodorant and antiperspirant formulations. This page records the finished-product aluminium context and exposure assumptions without treating the report as a market survey.
Key numbers
- Evaluation identity:
Use of Aluminium in Antiperspirants, AICIS evaluation statementEVA00100, dated22 December 2022. - Evaluation scope: the assessment covers aluminium salts listed on the Australian Inventory of Industrial Chemicals and focuses on their use in antiperspirants and deodorants; worker risks were previously assessed under NICNAS IMAP.
- SCCS 2014 aluminium chlorohydrate formulation levels:
38%in aerosol formulations,14.5%in roll-on formulations, and21%in stick formulations, equivalent to9.5% Al,3.6% Al, and5.2% Al, respectively. A later supporting-information section reports the roll-on equivalent as3.61% Al. - Industry survey summary: based on data from a
2016industry survey, total aluminium concentration in a range of deodorant and antiperspirant products was3.24-7.7%. - SCCS 2022 Table 1 aluminium-salt concentrations in cosmetic products (
Max conc. %;Mean conc. %): sulfuric acid, aluminium salt (3:2)6.25;5.1; aluminium chloride hydroxide (Al2Cl(OH)5)25.5;18.5; aluminium chloride, basic30.9;21.3; aluminium zirconium chloride hydroxide10.2;10.2; aluminium chloride (AlCl3)12;11.1; aluminium chloride hexahydrate12;11.1; potassium alum dodecahydrate6.25;5.1. - SCCS 2022 Table 2 aluminium concentrations in deodorants and antiperspirants (
Max aluminium conc %;Mean aluminium conc %): deo roll on - gel6.18;1.7; deo roll on - roll on5.63;1.45; deo roll on - stick7.73;1.05; deo spray - anti perspirant3.24;0.32; deo spray - pump4.88;1.17. - Absorption assumptions: oral bioavailability is estimated at
0.3%via drinking water and0.1%via food. Dermal bioavailability from a recent study was0.00052%; with aluminium found in faeces (0.0014%), overall bioavailable aluminium was0.00192%. The report says95%of the dose remained on the skin and did not penetrate the body. - Risk-assessment point of departure: with a NOAEL of
30 mg/kg bw/dayfrom a neurodevelopmental toxicity study in rats, systemic exposure at the NOAEL was calculated as180 µg Al /kg bw/day. - Dermal SED values: at
0.00192%dermal bioavailability, SED was0.0265 µg Al/kg bw/dayfor non-spray formulations and0.0204 µg Al/kg bw/dayfor spray formulations. At0.00052%dermal bioavailability, SED was0.007 µg Al/kg bw/dayfor non-spray formulations and0.006 µg Al/kg bw/dayfor spray formulations. - Inhalation SED values: SCCS 2020 estimates were
0.00781 µg/kg bw/dayfor respirable particles in deep lung,0.00234 µg/kg bw/dayfor respirable particles deposited in the upper respiratory tract, and0.000432 µg/kg bw/dayfor non-respirable particles. SCCS 2022 estimated0.256 µg/kg bw/dayfor antiperspirant-spray inhalation using conservative assumptions of3%lung uptake and100%inhalation of released spray particles. - Margin-of-safety values copied from the source: dermal MOS at
0.00192%bioavailability was6792for non-spray and8823for spray formulations; dermal MOS at0.00052%bioavailability was25714for non-spray and30000for spray formulations. Inhalation MOS values were23047,76923, and416667for the SCCS 2020 particle fractions, while the SCCS 2022 conservative spray-inhalation MOS was703.
Methods (brief)
AICIS conducted a public human-health risk assessment for aluminium salts in antiperspirants and deodorants using prior NICNAS IMAP assessments, SCCS opinions, RIVM/VKM exposure evaluations, and industry-supplied SCCS 2022 concentration data. The report is a regulatory evaluation, not a primary laboratory occurrence study: it does not report product sampling locations, raw sample IDs, analytical instruments, LOD/LOQ values, CRM recoveries, or a new concentration dataset generated by AICIS. Concentration values are retained only as the SCCS/industry formulation context printed in the report.
Related evidence
Update history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git.
| Commit | Date | Change | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| b01ec52c31 | 2026-08-04 | major | 1 section added |
| 3171d069e3 | 2026-08-02 | major | 1 section added |
| 90a2f9a38e | 2026-07-30 | major | 1 section added and 1 removed; narrative text revised |
| eaa8eeeedf | 2026-07-27 | major | 1 section added |
| 50de6ab217 | 2026-07-27 | minor | Narrative text revised |
