Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index
An unmarked underarm stick container and a roll-on bottle with its roller ball visible illustrating aicis2022 aluminium antiperspirants evaluation research context.

Use of Aluminium in Antiperspirants: Evaluation statement

Overview

The Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme evaluated aluminium salts used in antiperspirants and deodorants as a public human-health risk assessment. The report does not contain new product testing, but it summarizes SCCS concentration and exposure data for deodorant and antiperspirant formulations. This page records the finished-product aluminium context and exposure assumptions without treating the report as a market survey.

Key numbers

  • Evaluation identity: Use of Aluminium in Antiperspirants, AICIS evaluation statement EVA00100, dated 22 December 2022.
  • Evaluation scope: the assessment covers aluminium salts listed on the Australian Inventory of Industrial Chemicals and focuses on their use in antiperspirants and deodorants; worker risks were previously assessed under NICNAS IMAP.
  • SCCS 2014 aluminium chlorohydrate formulation levels: 38% in aerosol formulations, 14.5% in roll-on formulations, and 21% in stick formulations, equivalent to 9.5% Al, 3.6% Al, and 5.2% Al, respectively. A later supporting-information section reports the roll-on equivalent as 3.61% Al.
  • Industry survey summary: based on data from a 2016 industry survey, total aluminium concentration in a range of deodorant and antiperspirant products was 3.24-7.7%.
  • SCCS 2022 Table 1 aluminium-salt concentrations in cosmetic products (Max conc. %; Mean conc. %): sulfuric acid, aluminium salt (3:2) 6.25; 5.1; aluminium chloride hydroxide (Al2Cl(OH)5) 25.5; 18.5; aluminium chloride, basic 30.9; 21.3; aluminium zirconium chloride hydroxide 10.2; 10.2; aluminium chloride (AlCl3) 12; 11.1; aluminium chloride hexahydrate 12; 11.1; potassium alum dodecahydrate 6.25; 5.1.
  • SCCS 2022 Table 2 aluminium concentrations in deodorants and antiperspirants (Max aluminium conc %; Mean aluminium conc %): deo roll on - gel 6.18; 1.7; deo roll on - roll on 5.63; 1.45; deo roll on - stick 7.73; 1.05; deo spray - anti perspirant 3.24; 0.32; deo spray - pump 4.88; 1.17.
  • Absorption assumptions: oral bioavailability is estimated at 0.3% via drinking water and 0.1% via food. Dermal bioavailability from a recent study was 0.00052%; with aluminium found in faeces (0.0014%), overall bioavailable aluminium was 0.00192%. The report says 95% of the dose remained on the skin and did not penetrate the body.
  • Risk-assessment point of departure: with a NOAEL of 30 mg/kg bw/day from a neurodevelopmental toxicity study in rats, systemic exposure at the NOAEL was calculated as 180 µg Al /kg bw/day.
  • Dermal SED values: at 0.00192% dermal bioavailability, SED was 0.0265 µg Al/kg bw/day for non-spray formulations and 0.0204 µg Al/kg bw/day for spray formulations. At 0.00052% dermal bioavailability, SED was 0.007 µg Al/kg bw/day for non-spray formulations and 0.006 µg Al/kg bw/day for spray formulations.
  • Inhalation SED values: SCCS 2020 estimates were 0.00781 µg/kg bw/day for respirable particles in deep lung, 0.00234 µg/kg bw/day for respirable particles deposited in the upper respiratory tract, and 0.000432 µg/kg bw/day for non-respirable particles. SCCS 2022 estimated 0.256 µg/kg bw/day for antiperspirant-spray inhalation using conservative assumptions of 3% lung uptake and 100% inhalation of released spray particles.
  • Margin-of-safety values copied from the source: dermal MOS at 0.00192% bioavailability was 6792 for non-spray and 8823 for spray formulations; dermal MOS at 0.00052% bioavailability was 25714 for non-spray and 30000 for spray formulations. Inhalation MOS values were 23047, 76923, and 416667 for the SCCS 2020 particle fractions, while the SCCS 2022 conservative spray-inhalation MOS was 703.

Methods (brief)

AICIS conducted a public human-health risk assessment for aluminium salts in antiperspirants and deodorants using prior NICNAS IMAP assessments, SCCS opinions, RIVM/VKM exposure evaluations, and industry-supplied SCCS 2022 concentration data. The report is a regulatory evaluation, not a primary laboratory occurrence study: it does not report product sampling locations, raw sample IDs, analytical instruments, LOD/LOQ values, CRM recoveries, or a new concentration dataset generated by AICIS. Concentration values are retained only as the SCCS/industry formulation context printed in the report.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c312026-08-04major1 section added
3171d069e32026-08-02major1 section added
90a2f9a38e2026-07-30major1 section added and 1 removed; narrative text revised
eaa8eeeedf2026-07-27major1 section added
50de6ab2172026-07-27minorNarrative text revised