Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Small-Scale Survey of Organotin Compounds in Household Commodities

Overview

This March/April 1993 Journal of AOAC International technical communication by Sadaji Yamada and colleagues at the Aichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health and the Aichi Prefectural Government Department of Health (Nagoya, Japan) reports an organotin-compound (OTC) survey of 95 household commodity items purchased in Aichi Prefecture between 1990 and 1992. The survey covered the 13 household-product classes designated under Japan’s 1973 Law for the Control of Household Products Containing Harmful Substances (textile products including diapers, diaper covers, bibs, sanitary panties, underwear, socks, gloves, outergarments, and stockings; plus shoe polishes, adhesives, paints, and waxes) and assayed for six organotin species by flame photometric detection/gas chromatography (FPD/GC) with GC/MS confirmation. Tributyltin (TBT) and triphenyltin (TPT) — which Japan had banned for household-product use in 1979–1980 under the Law cited — were not detected in any of the 95 items. Mono- and/or di-substituted octyltin (DOT, TOT) and dibutyltin (DBT) compounds, which were not banned, were detected in 15 items: 6 of 10 diaper covers, 3 of 10 bibs, 2 of 10 sanitary panties, 1 of 5 outergarments, 1 of 5 stockings, 1 of 5 socks, and 1 of 10 shoe polishes. Diapers themselves, underwear, gloves, adhesives, paint, and wax were OTC-negative across all items tested. The single highest organotin loading observed was DOT at 1666.7 µg/g (≈ 0.17% by weight) in a polyester diaper cover; a second polyester diaper cover reached DOT at 902.8 µg/g with co-occurring TOT at 58.3 µg/g and DBT at 33.7 µg/g. The authors attribute octyltin and dibutyltin occurrence to intentional addition as silicone-coating catalysts (water-resistivity treatment for diaper covers, outergarments, and shoe polish) and to carry-over from poly(vinyl chloride) and polyurethane stabiliser additives.

Key numbers

Sampling frame (Methods, p. 437; Results Table 2, p. 440)

  • Total items surveyed: 95 commercially available household commodities purchased 1990–1992 at retail stores in Aichi Prefecture, Japan; no more than two items per manufacturer per category.
  • Category-by-category counts (number assayed / number with OTC detected):
  • Diaper 10/0
  • Diaper cover 10/6
  • Bib 10/3
  • Sanitary panty 10/2
  • Underwear 10/0
  • Socks 5/1
  • Gloves 5/0
  • Outergarment 5/1
  • Stockings 5/1
  • Shoe polish 10/1
  • Adhesive 5/0
  • Paint 5/0
  • Wax 5/0
  • OTC detection frequencies by category: 6/10 (60%) diaper covers; 3/10 bibs; 2/10 sanitary panties; 1/5 outergarments; 1/5 stockings; 1/5 socks; 1/10 shoe polishes.
  • Items with OTC detected: 15 of 95 (15.8%).

Per-species detection counts (Table 2, p. 440)

Reported as number of items in which each species was found, expressed as the propylated/derivatised form quantified by FPD/GC:

SpeciesDiaperDiaper coverBibSanitary pantyUnderwearSocksGlovesOutergarmentStockingsShoe polishAdhesivePaintWax
DBT0301000000000
TBT0000000000000
DOT0631010111000
TOT0400000010000
TPT0000000000000

(Source: Table 2 columns DBT, TBT, DOT, TOT, TPT. The DPT column is absent from Table 2 because diphenyltin was dropped from the determinative procedure — see Methods.)

Per-item organotin concentrations (Table 3, p. 440; µg/g as chloride form)

Each value is the mean of duplicate determinations and is expressed as the dichloride for di-substituted species (DBTD, DOTD) and as the chloride for tri-substituted species (TOTC).

Item IDDBT (µg/g)DOT (µg/g)TOT (µg/g)Materials or ingredients
Diaper cover A33.7902.858.3Cotton, polyester
Diaper cover B8.91666.7—Polyester
Diaper cover C—743.4128.5Cotton
Diaper cover D—509.691.3Polyester
Diaper cover E—288.033.6Wool
Diaper cover F3.724.4—Polyester, polyurethane
Bib A—312.5—Cotton, polyester
Bib B—59.7—Cotton, poly(vinyl chloride)
Bib C—48.9—Cotton, poly(vinyl chloride)
Sanitary panty A—144.4—Cotton, polyurethane, nylon
Sanitary panty B5.5——Nylon, polyurethane
Outergarment—388.9—Cotton
Stockings—136.114.2Nylon, polyurethane
Socks—34.2—Cotton, polyurethane, nylon
Shoe polish—326.4—Wax, lipid, organic solvent

Range summary across detection-positive items (Results and Discussion, p. 440)

  • DOT (dioctyltin dichloride basis): detected in 14 of the 15 OTC-positive items (all except Sanitary panty B), with concentrations ranging from 24.4 µg/g (Diaper cover F) to 1666.7 µg/g (Diaper cover B).
  • DBT (dibutyltin dichloride basis): detected in 4 items, ranging from 3.7 µg/g (Diaper cover F) to 33.7 µg/g (Diaper cover A).
  • TOT (trioctyltin chloride basis): detected in 5 samples; the authors attribute its co-occurrence with DOT to TOT being a known impurity in commercially available DOT preparations rather than an independently added compound.
  • TBT and TPT: not detected in any of the 95 items (consistent with the Japanese ban for household-product use in 1979–1980).
  • Diaper cover A contained DOT at 902.8 µg/g (≈ 0.09% by weight) — the paper describes this as “near 1000 ppm DOT” — and diaper cover B reached DOT at 1666.7 µg/g (≈ 0.17% by weight), characterised by the paper as “a similar concentration” though it is in fact ≈ 1.85× the diaper-cover-A value. The authors describe DOT in diaper cover A, bib A, outergarments, and shoe polish as catalysts used with silicones to increase water resistivity of the textile or polish substrate, given the considerable amounts and the documented use of these products. On other samples (lower-loading bibs, stockings, socks, sanitary panties), the authors propose carry-over from poly(vinyl chloride) and polyurethane stabiliser/catalyst use during fabric or component manufacture.

Detection limits (Methods, p. 438)

  • Detection limits were 0.2 ppm (≈ 0.2 µg/g) for DBTC, TBTC, and DOTD and 0.5 ppm for TOTC and TPTC.
  • DPT was excluded from the determinative panel because recovery from textile products via the Florisil cleanup was poor and could not be improved within the scope of this study; the authors cite [Ishizaka et al. 1989] as having reached the same conclusion for fish matrices.

Recovery (Table 1, p. 438; mean ± SD across triplicate analyses)

Spike-recovery at 3.0 ppm in four item types:

ItemDBTTBTDOTTOTDPTTPT
Diaper cover93.9 ± 3.591.8 ± 2.992.0 ± 3.292.3 ± 3.138.8 ± 5.591.9 ± 3.7
Socks92.4 ± 3.890.5 ± 2.591.5 ± 2.592.8 ± 3.235.3 ± 5.193.1 ± 3.7
Adhesive89.1 ± 3.188.5 ± 3.988.9 ± 3.085.0 ± 3.174.9 ± 4.591.1 ± 3.5
Shoe polish87.1 ± 3.589.5 ± 3.590.3 ± 3.291.3 ± 2.989.6 ± 3.191.0 ± 3.5

DPT recovery from the two textile matrices (38.8% and 35.3%) is the basis for excluding DPT from the determinative panel.

Chromatographic retention times (Figure 1, p. 437)

Standard mixture of propylated derivatives gave the following FPD/GC retention times:

  • Dipropyl-DBT 5.12 min
  • Propyl-TBT 6.15 min
  • Dipropyl-DOT 14.11 min
  • Dipropyl-DPT 14.83 min
  • Propyl-TOT 18.23 min
  • Propyl-TPT 19.83 min

GC/MS confirmation (Figures 3–5, p. 439)

Mass-spectral confirmation for the three positively detected species used the following diagnostic peaks (base and fragment ions):

  • Dipropyl-DBT: base peak m/z 221 [tin (Sn)(C₄H₉)(C₃H₇)]⁺; fragment peaks at m/z 121 [Sn]⁺, 165 [Sn(C₃H₇)₂]⁺, 179 [Sn(C₄H₉)₂]⁺, 207 [Sn(C₃H₇)₂]⁺, 235 [Sn(C₄H₉)₂]⁺, 263 [Sn(C₃H₇)₂(C₄H₉)]⁺, and 277 [Sn(C₃H₇)(C₄H₉)₂]⁺. Mass spectra of peak 1 in the diaper-cover A chromatogram matched the dipropyl-DBT standard.
  • Dipropyl-DOT: mass spectra of peak 2 matched the dipropyl-DOT standard.
  • Propyl-TOT: mass spectra of peak 3 matched the propyl-TOT standard.

Methods (brief)

Apparatus. FPD/GC: Shimadzu GC-8A gas chromatograph (Shimadzu Co., Ltd, Kyoto, Japan) with a flame photometric detector operated in the tin mode (610 nm filter) and a Shimadzu C-R1B integrator, using a megabore DB-17 column (15 m × 0.53 mm id, J&W Scientific, Inc., Folsom, CA 95630). Oven programmed 80→250 °C at 8 °C/min; injection port and detector 270 °C. Gas flow: nitrogen carrier 20 mL/min; hydrogen 0.5 kg/cm²; air 0.7 kg/cm². GC/MS confirmation: Hewlett Packard GC 5890 series II coupled to a JEOL JMS-AX505W mass spectrometer (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), electron-impact mode, ionization voltage 70 eV, ionization current 300 µA, helium carrier 20 mL/min, separator and ion source 250 °C; same column programme as FPD/GC.

Reagents. Tri-n-butyltin chloride (TBTC), triphenyltin chloride (TPTC), di-n-butyltin dichloride (DBTD), di-n-octyltin dichloride (DOTD; prepared from di-n-octyltin oxide per the official method [Standard Method of Analysis for Hygienic Chemists-With Commentary, Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, 1990]), and tri-n-octyltin chloride (TOTC) — sources: Tokyo Kasei Kogyo Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan (Bu/Oc tin standards); Fluka Chemie AG, Buchs, Switzerland (TOTC); Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI 53201 (DPTD). DOTD was purified on a 10% hydrated alumina column per the method of [Takami et al. 1988, Bunseki Kagaku 37:117–122]. Propylation reagent: n-propyl magnesium bromide (PMB), ≈2 M in tetrahydrofuran (Tokyo Kasei Kogyo). Phosphate–citrate buffer: 1.43 g Na₂SO₄·12H₂O, 17.3 g citric acid, 5.0 g NaCl dissolved in 800 mL H₂O; adjusted to pH 2.0 with 1 M HCl; final volume 1 L.

Extraction (sample-type-specific). Textile products: 1 g sample refluxed for 30 min at 70 °C in 75 mL methanol containing 0.05% HCl; 50 mL phosphate–citrate buffer and 50 mL H₂O added to the filtrate; CH₂Cl₂ extracted (2 × 30 mL); dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄; evaporated. Water-soluble paint/adhesive: 1 g sample shaken vigorously with 20 mL MeOH and 1 mL HCl; filtrate treated with phosphate–citrate buffer and H₂O; CH₂Cl₂ extracted; evaporated. Lipo-soluble shoe polish/wax: 1 g sample homogenised with 2 mL MeOH, 50 mL 3 M HCl, and 10 g NaCl; extracted with 100 mL n-hexane–ethyl ether (4 + 6) twice; organic phase washed with 50 mL H₂O; evaporated.

Cleanup. Florisil column (Florisil PR, 3 g, 3 × 1.5 cm id) eluted with 40 mL ethyl ether (discarded fraction) followed by 40 mL ethyl ether–acetic acid (99 + 1) (collected fraction).

Derivatisation. Propylation: 1 mL n-hexane solution of the collected fraction combined with 1 mL PMB; 30 min at room temperature; 3 mL 0.5 M H₂SO₄ added dropwise to decompose excess PMB; reaction mixture transferred to a separatory funnel, flask rinsed with 10 mL EtOH, 70 mL H₂O added, n-hexane extracted (2 × 20 mL); organic phase dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄; redissolved in n-hexane for FPD/GC and GC/MS analysis.

Quantitation. Calibration ranges (as propylated standards): dipropyl-DBT 0.2–5.0 µg/mL (as DBTD), dipropyl-DOT 0.2–10.0 µg/mL (as DOTD), propyl-TOT 0.5–15.0 µg/mL (as TOTC). Each detection-positive item was confirmed by GC/MS.

Spike recovery. OTC standards spiked at 3.0 ppm into four item categories (diaper cover, socks, adhesive, shoe polish); triplicate analyses; results in Table 1 (above). DPT recovery from textile products was 35–39%, the basis for dropping DPT from the determinative panel.

Limitations explicitly named by the authors. (i) Small sample frame — characterised by the authors as a “small-scale survey” rather than a definitive prevalence study; the conclusions note that the project does not reflect the prevalence in most items designated under the Law. (ii) DPT not determinable in textile products at the chosen recovery threshold. (iii) Dermal-absorption toxicology not assessed — the authors do not convert µg/g substrate concentrations into skin contact dose estimates because no examinations were performed on amounts contacting body surfaces and being absorbed. (iv) The authors flag that high concentrations were observed despite the small frame, and propose extending the survey with an improved DPT-recoverable sample preparation.

Implications

  • Certification (HMTc). Adds 1990–1992 Japanese occurrence data for organotin substrate-content in household textile products and shoe polish to the HMI tin/organotin evidence base. Diaper covers in particular reached 0.1% w/w DOT (1666.7 µg/g) in one polyester sample, with DOT-positive in 6 of 10 diaper covers. For HMTc certification of categories under the wiki product taxonomy that overlap with the surveyed items (bibs, diapers-and-components, period-underwear-reusable-garments, infant-clothing), this paper is the legacy Japanese-baseline complement to the Stringer 2001 multi-country dataset (Toxic chemicals in a child's world: an investigation into PVC plastic products). This page does not propose HMTc thresholds.
  • App. Not directly relevant to ingredient contamination_profile data because no food matrices were sampled. Potentially relevant to a future textile/household-article screening surface that uses material composition (polyester, polyurethane, poly(vinyl chloride), cotton) and product category as a DOT/DBT/TOT contamination-likelihood predictor — particularly for diaper-cover sub-formats.
  • Courses. Useful case study for the regulatory-history teaching module covering Japan’s 1973 Law for the Control of Household Products Containing Harmful Substances, the 1979–1980 Japanese phase-out of TBT and TPT in household products, and the contrast between regulated (TBT/TPT) and unregulated (DBT/DOT/TOT) organotin species in the same product categories. Also a methodological case study for tin-mode FPD/GC with PMB propylation and Florisil cleanup of textile/lipo-soluble matrices.
  • Cross-reference. This paper is the temporally earliest organotin-in-consumer-product dataset in the HMI corpus and the only Japanese-jurisdiction entry. It is the analytical-methodology and country-coverage predecessor of Toxic chemicals in a child's world: an investigation into PVC plastic products, which extended organotin-speciation surveys to PVC consumer products across 20 countries in 2001 and identified DBT and DOT as the predominant species — replicating the Yamada 1993 pattern of DBT/DOT predominance over TBT/TPT in non-marine consumer-product matrices.

Update history

No substantive edit history is available in this build. The full commit record is available in git.