Skip to content

Houston et al. 2023 - Alumina nanofibers for Hg(II) and Pb(II) removal

Houston and colleagues synthesized amine-functionalized gamma-alumina nanofibers and tested them as adsorbents for mercury(II) and lead(II) ions in prepared aqueous solutions. This is primary remediation-method evidence, not occurrence evidence for food, ingredients, consumer products, or field drinking-water samples.

Key numbers

Concentration-response and pH

The batch adsorption tests used 20 mg of Al2O3-NH-NH2 nanofiber in 30 mL aqueous solutions at room temperature for 3 hours unless otherwise noted.

EndpointHg(II) resultPb(II) result
Maximum removal in concentration-response tests98% removal at 40 mg/L; nearly 100% removal up to 40 mg/L per discussion90% removal at 35 mg/L; 97% removal at 2.5 mg/L
Lower-concentration performanceMore than 90% removal below 50 mg/L; 99% at 1 and 2.5 mg/LMore than 90% removal below 35 mg/L
Higher-concentration performanceMore than 80% removal at 100 mg/L; 23% removal at 525 mg/LLess than 50% removal at 100 mg/L; 20% removal at 500 mg/L
pH optimumpH about 6; 98% removalpH about 6; 77% removal

The authors compare these test levels with water-contamination context from the literature, but the measured values in this paper are controlled spike-removal experiments.

Kinetics and adsorption capacities

For contact-time experiments, the authors tested 100 mg/L and 250 mg/L Hg(II) and Pb(II) solutions. Most adsorption occurred within the first hour, and no meaningful additional removal occurred between 1 and 3 hours.

Metal ionInitial concentration (mg/L)Experimental qe (mg/g)1-hour removalPseudo-second-order qe calculated (mg/g)Pseudo-second-order R2
Hg(II)10012986%129.870.9997
Hg(II)25016555%113.631.0000
Pb(II)1007248%73.530.9993
Pb(II)25011126%112.360.9991

Table 2 reports that pseudo-second-order kinetic fits had much higher R2 values than pseudo-first-order fits, which the authors interpret as evidence that chemisorption is the better kinetic description.

Selectivity and desorption

Selectivity experiments mixed 50 mg/L Hg(II) or Pb(II) with separate 100 mg/L or 250 mg/L solutions of Zn(II), Mg(II), Cu(IV), Sn(IV), or Ni(IV), as written by the source. For Hg(II), all 100 mg/L cation-competition solutions retained more than 90% Hg removal: the highest was Hg/Zn at 0.373 mmol/g with 100% Hg adsorbed and 2.87% Zn adsorbed; the lowest was Hg/Ni at 0.343 mmol/g with 93.94% Hg adsorbed and 42.3% Ni adsorbed. At 250 mg/L cation competition, Hg/Ni was highest at 0.367 mmol/g with 98.51% Hg adsorbed, and Hg/Sn was lowest at 0.277 mmol/g with 74.32% Hg adsorbed.

For Pb(II), the nanofiber was less selective. At 100 mg/L cation competition, Pb/Ni was highest at 0.345 mmol/g with 91.5% Pb adsorbed, while Pb/Zn was lowest at 0.118 mmol/g with 50.8% Pb adsorbed. At 250 mg/L cation competition, Pb/Ni was highest at 0.364 mmol/g with 96.54% Pb removal, and Pb/Zn was lowest at 0.245 mmol/g with 56.7% Pb adsorbed.

Desorption with nitric acid increased as acid molarity increased; the source reports 69.5% Hg and 90.2% Pb desorbed at the highest HNO3 condition. For HCl, the optimum desorption was 0.05 M for Hg and 0.5 M for Pb: 62% Hg desorbed at 0.05 M HCl, while Pb desorption was 52% at 0.5 M, 40.3% at 1.0 M, and 38% at 0.05 M. Purified water was the least effective desorption condition, with 2.1% Hg and 3.33% Pb in solution.

Methods (brief)

The authors synthesized amine-functionalized gamma-Al2O3 nanofibers by preparing boehmite from aluminum nitrate and ammonia, calcining at 450 C, and grafting with 3-(2-aminoethylamino) propyl trimethoxysilane under reflux in toluene. The adsorbent was characterized by TEM, SEM-EDS, elemental mapping, XRD, and XPS before and after adsorption.

Adsorption tests used prepared Hg(II) and Pb(II) solutions from mercury chloride and lead salts. Concentration-response experiments covered low to high mg/L concentrations; pH experiments used 50 mg/L Hg(II) and Pb(II) solutions from pH 2 to 10; kinetic experiments used 100 mg/L and 250 mg/L solutions with time points from 10 minutes to 3 hours. Metal concentrations were quantified by ICP-OES. Selectivity tests added competing cations, and desorption tests used demineralized water plus 0.05 M, 0.5 M, and 1.0 M HCl or HNO3.

Implications

Certification: Do not use this source in food, ingredient, drinking-water occurrence, infant-food, supplement, cosmetic, or product benchmark pools. It measures removal from prepared aqueous spike solutions, not contaminant levels in a consumer matrix.

App: Context for water-treatment and remediation notes. The nanofiber showed stronger binding and selectivity for Hg(II) than Pb(II), with rapid one-hour equilibrium under the tested conditions and partial acid desorption.

Courses: Useful for distinguishing sorbent capacity, removal percentage, pH-dependent chemistry, and selectivity from occurrence concentrations. It also illustrates why Hg(II) removal does not substitute for methylmercury evidence.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

This page was built from the full PDF, including Table 1 comparator adsorbents, synthesis and adsorption methods, characterization sections, Figure 4 concentration-response discussion, Figure 5 pH response, Figure 6 contact-time results, Table 2 kinetic parameters, Figure 8 selectivity discussion, Figure 9 desorption discussion, conclusion, supplementary-materials note, and data-availability statement. Products and ingredients are intentionally empty because all measured concentrations come from controlled aqueous solutions. The source reports Hg(II) and Pb(II); this page preserves ion-state specificity in prose while using broad Hg and Pb frontmatter metals.

Page history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateDescription
c1aef382026-06-02audit-queue: hamid2021-bacterial-plant-biostimulants-review audited-promote