CSTEE 2003 - organotin exposure from consumer products and food-contact materials
The European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment reviewed non-food consumer and environmental exposures to organostannic compounds, while explicitly noting that foods and food-contact materials contribute to total exposure. This is an A-tier regulatory opinion and exposure-context source, not a primary occurrence survey. The opinion keeps organotin species such as MBT, DBT, TBT, MOT, DOT, and TPT distinct from total elemental tin.
Key numbers
- Document identity: CSTEE opinion adopted at the
38th plenary meetingon12 June 2003; the reviewed report version wasFinal Report 19 July 2002; extracted PDF has14pages. - Species groups reviewed in the report: monomethyltins (
MMT), dimethyltins (DMT), monobutyltins (MBT), dibutyltins (DBT), tributyltins (TBT), monooctyltins (MOT), and dioctyltins (DOT). The CSTEE flagged triphenyltins (TPT) and other alkyltins as important omissions. - Environmental exposure context: site-specific local predicted environmental concentrations for production were
0.2 - 0.4 µg/LforMBTC,DBTC,MOTC, andDOTC, and up to0.015forTBTC. - PVC-processing context: applying the selected low-volatility emission factors predicted local environmental concentrations up to
3 µg/Lfor mono- and dialkyl compounds; wood treatment gaveTBTCvalues of about0.16 µg/L. - Measured-water comparators cited by CSTEE: older regional data indicated up to
2and16 µg/LofMBTandDBTin fresh water; a more recent investigation found0.076,0.81, and3.6 µg/LofMBT,DBT, andTBT, respectively. - TBT ecotoxicity context: the reviewed report used a chronic
NOECof60 ng Sn/litrefor Daphnia magna. CSTEE noted imposex observations at lower concentrations, including1 ng TBT /litrein dog-whelk and a0.1 ng TBT-Sn/litrethreshold in Ocinebrina aciculata. It also cited flounder effects after exposure to0.1 mg TBTO/kg diet. - Food-contact context: the opinion states that food wrapped in organotin-stabilised
PVCmay add to total exposure and that butyltins from cookies prepared using silicone-coated baking paper may be problematic. - Baking-paper risk statement: CSTEE cites the Scientific Committee on Food conclusion that the estimated migration level exceeded the specific migration limit for dioctyltin compounds by a factor of
10, while the SCF judged occasional consumption unlikely to pose a risk in the phase-out context. - Child-cookie correction: CSTEE says the highest cookie value of
15.9 µg/kg bw/daywas a miscalculation and should be2 µg/kg bw/day, from50 g x 318 µg Sn/kg = 15.9 µg Snfor an8 kgchild. - Cycling-shorts correction: CSTEE recalculated TBT in the exposed area as
0.1 m2 x 1.2 kg/m2 x 45 mg Sn/kg = 5.4 mg Sn, with uptake estimated at0.09 µg/kg bw/day. - Paddling-pool scenario: daily exposure over the
20days of use was0.21 µg/kg bwfor an8 kgchild, calculated from5.1 µg Sn/L x 0.33 L / 8 kg bw. - PVC-toy oral-exposure proxy: using a doll DINP oral intake of about
20 µg/kg bw/day, the opinion estimated DBT oral intake at about0.2 µg/kg bw/dayif DBT concentration was1 %of DINP and the same release factor applied.
Dust organotin concentrations
The opinion cites a study of parliament-building dust samples:
| Compound | Concentration range |
|---|---|
| MBT | 182 - 2390 µg/kg |
| DBT | 172 - 890 µg/kg |
| TBT | 4 - 47 µg/kg |
| MOT | 62 - 832 µg/kg |
| DOT | 4 -116 µg/kg |
Toxicological reference and indoor-air scenario values
- TBT reference value used in the reviewed report:
0.27 µg/kg per dayTBT as chloride, based on WHO1999. - U.S. EPA benchmark cited by CSTEE: benchmark dose
0.68 ppm, corresponding to0.03 mg/kg BW/day. - CSTEE proposed adopting the low TDI value of TBT for
DBT,DOT, andTPTfor shared immunotoxicity, and treating effects as additive in the absence of contradictory data.
Annex 1 estimates DBT indoor-air exposure under four scenarios:
| Scenario component | Value 1 | Value 2 | Value 3 | Value 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBT in flooring | 500 mg/kg | 3588 mg/kg | 500 mg/kg | 3588 mg/kg |
| DBT in wall paper | 270 mg/kg | 3588 mg/kg | 270 mg/kg | 3588 mg/kg |
| Emission from floor | 38 µg/day | 275 µg/day | 384 µg/day | 2752 µg/day |
| Emission from wall | 13 µg/day | 172 µg/day | 129 µg/day | 1720 µg/day |
| Air concentration | 0.17 µg/m3 | 1.49 µg/m3 | 1.71 µg/m3 | 14.91 µg/m3 |
| Daily dose | 0.05 µg/kg bw/day | 0.3 µg/kg bw/day | 0.49 µg/kg bw/day | 4.26 µg/kg bw/day |
Methods (brief)
CSTEE reviewed a July 2002 risk-assessment report on non-biocidal organostannic uses, including polymer stabilisers, catalysts, wood preservatives, and selected consumer products. The opinion evaluates the report’s scenario assumptions, emission factors, environmental predicted concentrations, consumer-exposure calculations, toxicological reference values, and data gaps. It is not a laboratory study; the numbers are regulatory-review calculations, cited measurements, and CSTEE corrections to the reviewed report.
Implications
Certification (HMTc): This source is regulatory exposure context for organotin tin species in food-contact and consumer-product materials. It should not be pooled as a product occurrence distribution, and the organotin values should not be collapsed into total tin or inorganic tin.
Courses: The opinion is useful for teaching why organotin exposure cannot be treated as a single-source problem and why food-contact, toys, indoor air, dust, and environmental pathways can interact.
App: If organotin context is surfaced for food-contact packaging or children’s PVC materials, this source supports a qualitative distinction between organotin species and total elemental tin, and flags baking-paper/PVC-wrap and PVC-toy pathways as regulatory-review concerns.
Wiki pages this source may touch
Verification notes
- PDF text was extracted with
pdftotext -layoutto/tmp/ingest.txt; the title pages, question list, environmental-exposure section, human-exposure section, answers to questions, references, and Annex 1 were checked against this page. - Identity checks before creation: exact title phrase, raw SHA-256
88be80d9bbcb86798d187d983dc54109443244a614ff33d8624c0989fd491117, raw handleMFK_eu-risk-assessment-studies-on-targeted-consumer, and cite keycstee2003-organotin-consumer-exposurewere searched inwiki/sources/and evidence files; only intake/tracker CSV rows were found. - DOI status: no DOI is printed in the PDF metadata or extracted text. The page uses
doi: nullandno_doi_assigned: true. - Speciation: all tin-related values are organotin species or organotin-tin equivalents, not total tin or inorganic tin. Frontmatter uses
Snfor element-level routing following existing organotin-source convention and links[[metals/organotins]]in the wiki-page list. - Units and bases are preserved exactly as printed, including
µg/L,ng Sn/litre,ng TBT /litre,mg TBTO/kg diet,µg/kg bw/day,µg/kg,mg/kg,µg/day, andµg/m3. - The source’s toxicological reference values and migration-limit discussion are reported as CSTEE/SCF regulatory-review statements, not as HMTc thresholds.
- Closed-vocabulary check: product slugs use broad existing food-contact packaging, bakeware, and toy substrate rows. No exact baking-paper, PVC-flooring, wallpaper, indoor-dust, or paddling-pool product slug was invented; those contexts remain in prose.
Page history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.
| Commit | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 4039d20 | 2026-06-10 | scope: broaden ingest to the full upstream+downstream literature (marine, atmospheric, attribution, exposure, toxicology) — inclusion is the default |