Overview
The European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment reviewed non-food consumer and environmental exposures to organostannic compounds, while explicitly noting that foods and food-contact materials contribute to total exposure. This is an A-tier regulatory opinion and exposure-context source, not a primary occurrence survey. The opinion keeps organotin species such as MBT, DBT, TBT, MOT, DOT, and TPT distinct from total elemental tin.
Key numbers
- Document identity: CSTEE opinion adopted at the
38th plenary meetingon12 June 2003; the reviewed report version wasFinal Report 19 July 2002; extracted PDF has14pages. - Species groups reviewed in the report: monomethyltins (
MMT), dimethyltins (DMT), monobutyltins (MBT), dibutyltins (DBT), tributyltins (TBT), monooctyltins (MOT), and dioctyltins (DOT). The CSTEE flagged triphenyltins (TPT) and other alkyltins as important omissions. - Environmental exposure context: site-specific local predicted environmental concentrations for production were
0.2 - 0.4 µg/LforMBTC,DBTC,MOTC, andDOTC, and up to0.015forTBTC. - PVC-processing context: applying the selected low-volatility emission factors predicted local environmental concentrations up to
3 µg/Lfor mono- and dialkyl compounds; wood treatment gaveTBTCvalues of about0.16 µg/L. - Measured-water comparators cited by CSTEE: older regional data indicated up to
2and16 µg/LofMBTandDBTin fresh water; a more recent investigation found0.076,0.81, and3.6 µg/LofMBT,DBT, andTBT, respectively. - TBT ecotoxicity context: the reviewed report used a chronic
NOECof60 ng Sn/litrefor Daphnia magna. CSTEE noted imposex observations at lower concentrations, including1 ng TBT /litrein dog-whelk and a0.1 ng TBT-Sn/litrethreshold in Ocinebrina aciculata. It also cited flounder effects after exposure to0.1 mg TBTO/kg diet. - Food-contact context: the opinion states that food wrapped in organotin-stabilised
PVCmay add to total exposure and that butyltins from cookies prepared using silicone-coated baking paper may be problematic. - Baking-paper risk statement: CSTEE cites the Scientific Committee on Food conclusion that the estimated migration level exceeded the specific migration limit for dioctyltin compounds by a factor of
10, while the SCF judged occasional consumption unlikely to pose a risk in the phase-out context. - Child-cookie correction: CSTEE says the highest cookie value of
15.9 µg/kg bw/daywas a miscalculation and should be2 µg/kg bw/day, from50 g x 318 µg Sn/kg = 15.9 µg Snfor an8 kgchild. - Cycling-shorts correction: CSTEE recalculated TBT in the exposed area as
0.1 m2 x 1.2 kg/m2 x 45 mg Sn/kg = 5.4 mg Sn, with uptake estimated at0.09 µg/kg bw/day. - Paddling-pool scenario: daily exposure over the
20days of use was0.21 µg/kg bwfor an8 kgchild, calculated from5.1 µg Sn/L x 0.33 L / 8 kg bw. - PVC-toy oral-exposure proxy: using a doll DINP oral intake of about
20 µg/kg bw/day, the opinion estimated DBT oral intake at about0.2 µg/kg bw/dayif DBT concentration was1 %of DINP and the same release factor applied.
Dust organotin concentrations
The opinion cites a study of parliament-building dust samples:
| Compound | Concentration range |
|---|---|
| MBT | 182 - 2390 µg/kg |
| DBT | 172 - 890 µg/kg |
| TBT | 4 - 47 µg/kg |
| MOT | 62 - 832 µg/kg |
| DOT | 4 -116 µg/kg |
Toxicological reference and indoor-air scenario values
- TBT reference value used in the reviewed report:
0.27 µg/kg per dayTBT as chloride, based on WHO1999. - U.S. EPA benchmark cited by CSTEE: benchmark dose
0.68 ppm, corresponding to0.03 mg/kg BW/day. - CSTEE proposed adopting the low TDI value of TBT for
DBT,DOT, andTPTfor shared immunotoxicity, and treating effects as additive in the absence of contradictory data.
Annex 1 estimates DBT indoor-air exposure under four scenarios:
| Scenario component | Value 1 | Value 2 | Value 3 | Value 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBT in flooring | 500 mg/kg | 3588 mg/kg | 500 mg/kg | 3588 mg/kg |
| DBT in wall paper | 270 mg/kg | 3588 mg/kg | 270 mg/kg | 3588 mg/kg |
| Emission from floor | 38 µg/day | 275 µg/day | 384 µg/day | 2752 µg/day |
| Emission from wall | 13 µg/day | 172 µg/day | 129 µg/day | 1720 µg/day |
| Air concentration | 0.17 µg/m3 | 1.49 µg/m3 | 1.71 µg/m3 | 14.91 µg/m3 |
| Daily dose | 0.05 µg/kg bw/day | 0.3 µg/kg bw/day | 0.49 µg/kg bw/day | 4.26 µg/kg bw/day |
Methods (brief)
CSTEE reviewed a July 2002 risk-assessment report on non-biocidal organostannic uses, including polymer stabilisers, catalysts, wood preservatives, and selected consumer products. The opinion evaluates the report’s scenario assumptions, emission factors, environmental predicted concentrations, consumer-exposure calculations, toxicological reference values, and data gaps. It is not a laboratory study; the numbers are regulatory-review calculations, cited measurements, and CSTEE corrections to the reviewed report.
Implications
Certification (HMTc): This source is regulatory exposure context for organotin tin species in food-contact and consumer-product materials. It should not be pooled as a product occurrence distribution, and the organotin values should not be collapsed into total tin or inorganic tin.
Courses: The opinion is useful for teaching why organotin exposure cannot be treated as a single-source problem and why food-contact, toys, indoor air, dust, and environmental pathways can interact.
App: If organotin context is surfaced for food-contact packaging or children’s PVC materials, this source supports a qualitative distinction between organotin species and total elemental tin, and flags baking-paper/PVC-wrap and PVC-toy pathways as regulatory-review concerns.
Wiki pages this source may touch
- Flexible pouches/films
- Bakeware
- Toy substrate materials (accessible plastics/metals/woods/rubbers)
- Tin
- Organotins
Verification notes
- PDF text was extracted with
pdftotext -layoutto/tmp/ingest.txt; the title pages, question list, environmental-exposure section, human-exposure section, answers to questions, references, and Annex 1 were checked against this page. - Identity checks before creation: exact title phrase, raw SHA-256
88be80d9bbcb86798d187d983dc54109443244a614ff33d8624c0989fd491117, raw handleMFK_eu-risk-assessment-studies-on-targeted-consumer, and cite keycstee2003-organotin-consumer-exposurewere searched inwiki/sources/and evidence files; only intake/tracker CSV rows were found. - DOI status: no DOI is printed in the PDF metadata or extracted text. The page uses
doi: nullandno_doi_assigned: true. - Speciation: all tin-related values are organotin species or organotin-tin equivalents, not total tin or inorganic tin. Frontmatter uses
Snfor element-level routing following existing organotin-source convention and links[[metals/organotins]]in the wiki-page list. - Units and bases are preserved exactly as printed, including
µg/L,ng Sn/litre,ng TBT /litre,mg TBTO/kg diet,µg/kg bw/day,µg/kg,mg/kg,µg/day, andµg/m3. - The source’s toxicological reference values and migration-limit discussion are reported as CSTEE/SCF regulatory-review statements, not as HMTc thresholds.
- Closed-vocabulary check: product slugs use broad existing food-contact packaging, bakeware, and toy substrate rows. No exact baking-paper, PVC-flooring, wallpaper, indoor-dust, or paddling-pool product slug was invented; those contexts remain in prose.
Update history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.