Skip to content

Lin et al. 2025 - Coffee waste bio-adsorbent for metal and dye removal

Lin and colleagues used Coffee Powder Trimmings (CPT), including spent coffee grounds and dried coffee-processing residues, as a bio-adsorbent for copper and iron ions before converting the metal-loaded material into biochar composites for methylene blue removal. This is primary remediation/materials evidence, not coffee-ingredient occurrence evidence: the source reports engineered adsorption and biochar performance rather than metals measured in coffee as consumed.

Key numbers

Metal adsorption and biochar synthesis

The methods describe rinsed and dried CPT mixed with either FeCl3.6H2O at 0.05 g/L in 100 mL DI water or CuCl2.2H2O at 0.03 g/L in 100 mL DI water. Six grams of dried CPT were stirred with the metal solution at room temperature for 3 h, then dried and pyrolyzed at 750 degrees C for 3 h at a 5 degrees C/min ramp to generate Fe/CB or Cu/CB.

The abstract reports that CPT removed more than 95% of Cu2+ and Fe3+ through chelation. Section 3.2 and the Figure 4 captions then label the iron removal experiment as Fe2+ rather than Fe3+; see the verification notes for this source-internal inconsistency.

Kinetic fitting for the metal-removal step favored the pseudo-second-order model. The paper reports R2 = 0.998 for Cu2+ and R2 = 0.999 for iron in the PSO plots, while the PFO fit was weaker for Cu2+ (R2 = 0.883) and stronger for iron (R2 = 0.997). The authors state that both metals reached rapid removal within the first 20 min and approached equilibrium afterward.

Textural properties of CPT-derived biochars

Table 1 reports surface area, pore volume, and Raman ID/IG values:

MaterialBET surface area (m2/g)Pore volume (cc/g)ID/IG
CPT15.2300.015not reported
CB450.4930.0251.18
Cu/CB559.2130.0291.15
Fe/CB492.0970.0201.19

EDS results in the text report CPT as 51.58 wt% carbon and 47.56 wt% oxygen, with minor sulfur at 0.39 wt% and calcium at 0.47 wt%. After pyrolysis, CB carbon increased to 87.30 wt%. Cu/CB contained Cu at 0.02 wt%, and Fe/CB contained Fe at 0.10 wt%; after methylene blue adsorption, the used materials showed 0.12 wt% Cu and 2.34 wt% Fe.

Dye-removal performance after metal loading

Although dye removal is not HMTc occurrence evidence, it is part of the source’s primary dual-use remediation claim. Table 2 reports methylene blue kinetic parameters at 30 degrees C, initial dye concentration 10 mg/L, adsorbent dosage 6 g, and solution volume 0.1 L:

MaterialExperimental qe (mg/g)PFO qe (mg/g)PFO k1 (min^-1)PFO R2PSO qe (mg/g)PSO k2 (g/mg min)PSO R2
CB41.08647.050-0.0320.97344.3160.0020.948
Cu/CB52.52064.846-0.0460.97855.4310.0020.985
Fe/CB55.24246.610-0.0350.97657.6070.0030.990

Table 3 compares room-temperature methylene blue adsorption capacity and activation energy, reporting qe = 41.086 mg/g and Ea = 53.7 kJ/mol for CB, qe = 52.520 mg/g and Ea = 35.6 kJ/mol for Cu/CB, and qe = 55.242 mg/g and Ea = 48.4 kJ/mol for Fe/CB.

Fe/CB was the best-performing dye-removal material. Figure 6 reports methylene blue removal from 34.5% at 30 mg Fe/CB to 97.8% at 150 mg Fe/CB; maximum pH-condition removal of 95.2% at pH 4; 100% removal in tested lake, rain, tap, and seawater matrices; and recyclability of 100% for the first three cycles, 97.98% in cycle 4, and 86.88% in cycle 5.

Methods (brief)

Coffee Powder Trimmings were supplied by CH Biotech in Nantou, Taiwan, rinsed with deionized water, dried, and used first as a metal adsorbent and then as a pyrolysis precursor. Metal ions were quantified by ICP-MS. Methylene blue was quantified by UV-Vis absorbance at 664 +/- 1 nm. Materials were characterized with SEM/EDS, TEM, XRD, BET gas adsorption, FTIR, XPS, Raman spectroscopy, and TGA/DTG.

The metal-removal step used metal chloride solutions under laboratory conditions, not environmental or food samples. The biochar step used the metal-loaded CPT after pyrolysis and evaluated dye removal across contact time, temperature, pH, dose, water body, and reuse cycles.

Implications

Certification: Do not use this source in coffee, coffee ingredient, coffee beverage, or product occurrence pools. It does not measure Cu or Fe in coffee for consumption; it uses coffee-processing waste as a remediation material.

App: Context for remediation and circular-material notes involving spent coffee grounds, coffee waste biochar, copper/iron adsorption, and dye removal.

Courses: Useful for teaching why a familiar food-derived material can be a remediation matrix without becoming food-contaminant occurrence evidence.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

This page was built from the full PDF, including the abstract, reagents and synthesis protocol, characterization methods, Table 1 textural properties, Figure 4 copper/iron removal kinetics, Table 2 methylene blue kinetic parameters, Table 3 dye-removal capacity and activation energy comparison, Figure 6 dose/pH/water/reuse results, XPS mechanism discussion, conclusions, and data-availability statement. The paper is internally inconsistent about iron species: the abstract and FeCl3.6H2O method identify Fe3+, while Section 3.2 and Figure 4 captions refer to Fe2+. The source page therefore uses broad Fe in frontmatter and notes the discrepancy rather than treating either label as resolved. Products and ingredients are intentionally empty because this is a coffee-waste remediation study, not a coffee-food occurrence study.

Page history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateDescription
c1aef382026-06-02audit-queue: hamid2021-bacterial-plant-biostimulants-review audited-promote