Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Blood lead levels in children residing in a 115-year old urban settlement in Harare, Zimbabwe: a cross sectional study

Source

Chagonda and colleagues measured blood lead levels in 86 children under six years old living in Mbare, a high-density Harare suburb with old housing, possible lead-based paint, aged water infrastructure, and nearby industrial activity.

Page snapshot
Cited by2 pages
Metals measured1
Evidence tierA
Year2023

Overview

Chagonda and colleagues measured blood lead levels in 86 children under six years old living in Mbare, a high-density Harare suburb with old housing, possible lead-based paint, aged water infrastructure, and nearby industrial activity. The study also measured lead in soil, tap and borehole drinking water, paint chips, and puddle water; it is exposure and environmental-source evidence, not cookware occurrence evidence.

Key numbers

The overall mean blood lead level was 4.3 +/- 0.75 ug/dL in Table 1, with 12 of 86 children (13.95%, reported as 14.0% in the table) above 5.0 ug/dL. Mean blood lead was 4.3 +/- 0.78 ug/dL in males and 4.4 +/- 0.71 ug/dL in females, with no significant gender difference.

Table 4 reports lead levels in 10 specimens per environmental matrix:

Environmental specimenPb mean +/- SDRangeComparator listed by source
Soil89.8 +/- 71.1 mg/kg3.34-177.5 mg/kg250-400 mg/kg
Drinking water, community boreholes1.1 +/- 0.7 ug/L0.3-2.0 ug/LUp to 10 ug/L
Drinking water, community tap1.9 +/- 0.9 ug/L0.7-3.3 ug/LUp to 10 ug/L
Paint chips82.0 +/- 57.4 mg/kg9.64-169.2 mg/kgUp to 600 mg/kg
Water from puddles1.1 +/- 0.5 ug/L0.6-1.8 ug/LNot listed in extracted table continuation

In multivariate logistic regression, history of unexplained abdominal pain was associated with blood lead above 5 ug/dL after adjustment for petrol exposure and toy preference (OR 4.39, 95% CI 1.07-17.9). Children who played with random objects had higher blood lead than children who played with plastic toys in an unshown comparison cited in the results section (4.6 +/- 0.79 versus 4.2 +/- 0.70 ug/dL; p = 0.04).

Methods (brief)

The study used a cross-sectional design and enrolled children aged six years and below who had lived in the study site from birth. Whole blood was collected into EDTA tubes, diluted with 5% nitric acid, centrifuged, and analyzed for lead by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry at 283.3 nm using a Varian AA-1275 instrument; the analytical sensitivity was 1 ug/dL.

Environmental sampling included 10 g paint-chip scrapings from participating apartments, 20 g soil samples from play areas, and 100 mL water samples from puddles, communal boreholes, and municipal taps. Water samples were digested with hot concentrated nitric acid; soil and paint chips were extracted with aqua regia before flame AAS analysis. The environmental values are lead-only total/bioaccessible measurements and do not provide other HMTc analytes.

Implications

Certification: Do not route this source into cookware or product-occurrence benchmark pools. The auto-fetch filename points at cookware, but the paper measured child blood, residential environmental media, and questionnaire risk factors rather than metals leaching from cookware.

Courses: Useful as an exposure-routing example for older housing, paint chips, soil/dust, and water-infrastructure pathways in a consumer-safety heavy-metals curriculum.

App: Context-only for exposure education and risk-factor language; it does not provide ingredient or product concentration distributions.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

This page was built from the PDF text, including the abstract, methods, Tables 1 and 4, results, and discussion. The abstract appears to omit the micro symbol in “4.3 +/- 0.75 ug/dL” in text extraction; the tables and surrounding prose use ug/dL for blood lead. Products and ingredients are intentionally empty because the paper does not measure a consumer-product concentration matrix. The source reports total lead only.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c32026-08-04major1 section added
3171d069e2026-08-02major1 section added
90a2f9a382026-07-30major1 section added and 1 removed; narrative text revised
eaa8eeeed2026-07-27major1 section added
50de6ab212026-07-27minorNarrative text revised