Skip to content

Torović et al. 2024 — Mercury in fish oil supplements: Serbia and Srpska market

This conference abstract (presented at FENS 2023, Belgrade; published 2024 in MDPI Proceedings) reports total mercury concentrations in 42 fish oil supplements from the Serbian and Bosnian-Srpska markets, determined by a direct mercury analyzer. Total mercury ranged from 0.001 to 0.0057 mg/kg, with a mean of 0.0019 ± 0.0009 mg/kg — well below the regulatory maximum level for food supplements of 0.1 mg/kg cited by the authors (jurisdiction not specified in the abstract). Risk assessment against both the US EPA oral reference dose (RfD of 0.0001 mg/kg bw/day) and EFSA tolerable weekly intake (TWI of 0.0013 mg/kg bw) used the precautionary assumption that total mercury equals methylmercury (MeHg accounts for 75–98% of total mercury in fish). Mean consumer exposure represented 0.042 ± 0.039% of RfD and 0.023 ± 0.021% of TWI; the highest individual exposure reached 0.24% of RfD and 0.13% of TWI. The authors conclude that mercury risk from fish oil supplements is negligible even for pregnant and nursing women.

Key numbers

  • tHg range: 0.001–0.0057 mg/kg (1.0–5.7 ppb), n = 42
  • tHg mean ± SD: 0.0019 ± 0.0009 mg/kg (1.9 ± 0.9 ppb)
  • Regulatory maximum level for food supplements (cited by authors, jurisdiction not specified): 0.1 mg/kg (100 ppb) — all samples below this at < 6% of the limit
  • MeHg RfD (US EPA): 0.0001 mg/kg bw/day; mean exposure = 0.042 ± 0.039% of RfD
  • MeHg TWI (EFSA): 0.0013 mg/kg bw; mean exposure = 0.023 ± 0.021% of TWI
  • Maximum individual exposure: 0.24% of RfD, 0.13% of TWI

Speciation note: the study measured total Hg (tHg) only. The risk assessment applied the precautionary assumption tHg = MeHg, which is the more conservative approach. This paper does not provide species-resolved MeHg data.

Methods

Direct mercury analyzer (instrument vendor and model not specified in the abstract). Risk assessment applied the recommended intake of supplements (per the abstract; specific dose basis not stated) and the EFSA/EPA toxicological reference values for MeHg.

Limitations: This is a conference abstract (2 pages), not a full peer-reviewed article. Sample descriptions, sampling design, sample-preparation protocol, and individual-product results are not provided. The abstract does not name the specific supplements tested or describe how 42 products were selected.

Implications

Certification: Provides market-surveillance data supporting the position that fish oil supplements at recommended doses contribute negligibly to mercury exposure even under the conservative tHg = MeHg assumption. Useful as supporting context for HMT&C supplement product guidance.

Courses: Illustrates the precautionary principle applied to tHg/MeHg speciation in risk assessment for supplement products.

App: Supports a low-risk classification for fish oil supplements with respect to mercury at current market concentrations in the Serbia/Srpska market.

Wiki pages updated on ingest

Verification notes

  • 2026-05-26 merge-enhance: corrected raw_handle from generic manual-fetch-kimi placeholder to per-paper MFK_mercury-content-in-fish-oil-food-supplements-and-a; corrected truncated raw_path filename to the actual on-disk file (was ...Associated Healt.pdf, now ...Associated Health Risk.pdf); added access_url (MDPI DOI) and raw_sha256; re-verified all Key numbers against the source PDF (range 0.001–0.0057 mg/kg, mean 0.0019 ± 0.0009 mg/kg, exposure 0.042% RfD / 0.023% TWI, maxima 0.24% / 0.13%) — all match the abstract verbatim. License is CC BY 4.0 per MDPI publisher notice on page 1.
  • 2026-05-26 audit subagent (general-purpose) verdict REVISE applied: (1) removed MeHg from metals: frontmatter — study measured tHg only and applied a precautionary tHg=MeHg risk-math assumption; including MeHg would mis-route this as MeHg measurement evidence; (2) stripped unsupported “EU” qualifier from “0.1 mg/kg maximum level” — abstract does not specify jurisdiction; rephrased as “regulatory maximum level for food supplements (cited by authors, jurisdiction not specified)”; (3) tightened Methods to “direct mercury analyzer (instrument vendor and model not specified in the abstract)” — removed inferred “thermal decomposition amalgamation instrument” technology-class detail and “no sample preparation required” inference not present in the source; (4) softened “manufacturer-recommended intake doses” to “recommended intake of supplements (per the abstract; specific dose basis not stated)” — abstract does not specify who recommended the doses; (5) added the ±SD on exposure percentages (±0.039% RfD, ±0.021% TWI) for completeness. Audit-flagged fish-oil slug verified absent from wiki/ingredients/; not creating an ingredient page per per-cycle skill constraints — flagging for future auto-stub or provisional-scaffold pass. All numerical fidelity, brand firewall, and HMTc firewall checks were clean per audit; no false positives to reject.

Page history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateDescription
b0f3d382026-06-12batch | corpus rescreen b04 old terminal skips