Lutfullah et al. 2014 — Dried And Fluid Milk Metals

Summary

This peer-reviewed study measured essential and toxic metals in dried infant formula, powdered milk, fresh milk, and processed milk collected from markets in Peshawar, Pakistan. It is useful as broad formula-powder context because Table 2 reports nickel in the infant-formula group, but it is not cow-milk/non-soy resolved and does not provide an individual-product p90 distribution.

Key Numbers

Product groupMetalMean + SDRangeApproximate ppb equivalentTable
Infant formulaNickel0.0277 ppm0.022-0.032 ppmmean 27.7 ppb; range 22-32 ppbTable 2
Powdered milkNickel0.0202 ppm0.002-0.032 ppmmean 20.2 ppb; range 2-32 ppbTable 2
Fresh milkNickel0.0065 ppm0.003-0.009 ppmmean 6.5 ppb; range 3-9 ppbTable 2
Processed milkNickel0.0066 ppm0.004-0.009 ppmmean 6.6 ppb; range 4-9 ppbTable 2

Methods Brief

The study used nitric/perchloric acid wet digestion and atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Samples were prepared in triplicate.

Limitations

The infant-formula subset is not separated by soy versus non-soy formulation, and the source reports mean/range values rather than p10, p50, p90, or individual-product rows. The market is Peshawar, Pakistan; jurisdiction should be retained as metadata for aggregate evidence review rather than treated as a hard exclusion.

Implications

Certification: Useful supporting context for nickel in powdered infant formula, especially for source-scope maximum context. It is not row-specific evidence for cow-milk/non-soy formula and does not establish an HMT&C p90.

Courses: Useful example of why ppm-to-ppb normalization and market-scope caveats matter.

App: Supports a provisional nickel signal for formula-powder evidence retrieval after row-fit review.

Microbiome: No direct microbiome endpoint.

Wiki Pages Updated On Ingest