Rice finding 88
Source evidence and comparison details for the Rice profile.
Brown rice, non-parboiled (lab-dehulled) · Total arsenic (tAs) · 3 field sampling points (3 per variety, each 2 m2; text says three points in each of two locations, reported n=3).
Selected finding and reference
3 field sampling points (3 per variety, each 2 m2; text says three points in each of two locations, reported n=3). Basis: dry weight.
none; all samples above instrumental LOD (stated)
HMI baseline position
High · HMI dry-grain tAs reference · 8 sampling families. Mean as reported: 800 µg/kg. HMI median 186; Q1 140; Q3 210 µg/kg. 8 families. Not a safety grade.
Low is below Q1; Moderate includes Q1 through Q3; High is above Q3. Reporting bounds must give the same category throughout.
This is an external comparison; the finding does not set the reference.
Sensitivity to weighting
Equal subgroup weight within each family: High. The position is unchanged under this alternative. This check does not address all sampling, rounding or analytical uncertainty.
Sensitivity to source selection
- Without FDA rice survey (2013): High.
- Without Myat Soe et al. (2023): High.
- Without WHO GEMS/Food: High.
- Without Meharg et al. 2009: High.
- Without TatahMentan et al. 2020: High.
- Without Welna et al. 2018: High.
- Without Williams et al. 2007: High.
- Without Xie et al. 2026: High.
These checks show dependence on each sampling family; they are not confidence intervals.
Collection period
Collection date unreported
No year-by-year sample register is reconstructed from this summary.
Geographic scope
BRRI dhan28
Rice variety or type within one study.
Sampling, analysis and reporting limits
HNO3 + HClO4 heating-block digestion (0.5 g); total As by flow-injection HG-AAS (Perkin-Elmer AAnalyst 100, FIAS 100) with matrix-matched standards.
none; all samples above instrumental LOD (stated)
Source inconsistency noted (does not affect this value): the Abstract (lines 37-39) states 'parboiled and non-parboiled brown rice of BRRI dhan28 were 0.8±0.1 and 0.5±0.0 ... respectively', the reverse assignment; the Results text and the authors' conclusion (non-parboiled higher) support non-parboiled = 0.8. Also brown rice (0.8) exceeds raw rice with hu
Shared samples and study overlap
Subgroup rows, statistics of the same subgroup and the study total share samples; they are not independent results.
Each table row describes a food/analyte result. Repeated rows do not add independent samples or datasets. No cross-study trend is calculated in this comparison mode.
Reported values, conversion and source locator
| Source statistic | Original result | Displayed unit conversion |
|---|---|---|
| mean | brown rice of non-parboiled and parboiled of the rice variety contained 0.8±0.1 and 0.5±0.0 mg of As kg-1 dry weight, respectively (n=3) (Table 4) | mg/kg x 1000 |
Original SD: 0.1 mg kg-1 dry weight.
Results 'Arsenic distribution in fractions of rice grain', manuscript lines 220-222 (Table 4).
No moisture, cooking-yield or species conversion is applied to the original finding above. Any basis conversion used for its HMI comparison is stated separately with the numerical target.
Open the primary publication · HMI source record
Reference and scope
HMI dry-grain tAs reference · 8 sampling families. Dry-weight grain, µg/kg dry weight. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 140 | 186 | 210 |
| Alternative weighting | 140 | 186 | 210 |
32 reference units; 8 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA rice survey (2013) | 8 | 13% |
| Myat Soe et al. (2023) | 5 | 13% |
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 13% |
| Meharg et al. 2009 | 10 | 12% |
| TatahMentan et al. 2020 | 3 | 13% |
| Welna et al. 2018 | 1 | 13% |
| Williams et al. 2007 | 2 | 13% |
| Xie et al. 2026 | 1 | 13% |
Methods
HMI calculates a pooled distribution of subgroup medians across the admitted sampling families. HMI pools subgroup medians from every compatible rice sampling family in the evidence ledger for this analyte, material and basis: published subgroup medians, medians HMI calculates from printed per-sample values and WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling only). Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Dry-weight, native-moisture and cooked results are kept in separate references; no moisture conversion is assumed.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An evidence-library reference, not a probability sample of the world rice market. Sampling families differ in frame (retail, farm, contaminated sites, monitoring) and period; GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
- FDA rice survey (2013)
- Myat Soe et al. (2023)
- WHO GEMS/Food
- Meharg et al. 2009
- TatahMentan et al. 2020
- Welna et al. 2018
- Williams et al. 2007
- Xie et al. 2026
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:rice-dry-tAs:d4f75b6c7078
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.