Rice finding 131

Source evidence and comparison details for the Rice profile.

Welna et al. 2018

Brown (natural) rice · Total arsenic (tAs) · 9 retail packages (400 g, 4 x 100 g), each analysed in triplicate.

Selected finding and reference

172–233 µg/kg (range)Range.

9 retail packages (400 g, 4 x 100 g), each analysed in triplicate. Basis: dry weight (text: 'ng g−1 (d.w.)').

all samples quantified

HMI baseline position

Limited data: The source reports a range, percentile or extreme value; only a mean, median or sample result can be positioned against a reference. Missing evidence never means low contamination.

The source reports a range, percentile or extreme value; only a mean, median or sample result can be positioned against a reference.

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

No admitted reference

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

Collection period

Collection date unreported

No year-by-year sample register is reconstructed from this summary.

Geographic scope

Brown rice sold in Poland (B1-B9)

Purchase or reporting market; growing origin not identified.

Sampling, analysis and reporting limits

tAs: HG-ICP OES after microwave-assisted closed-vessel HNO3 digestion; iAs: species-selective HG-ICP OES (KI-ascorbic acid pre-reduction, 10 M HCl) after ultrasound-assisted aqua regia extraction.

all samples quantified

Source inconsistency noted (does not affect this value): the Conclusions state 'the i-As concentration within 172–233 ng g−1', which is the tAs range, not the iAs range (68–221).

Shared samples and study overlap

Subgroup rows, statistics of the same subgroup and the study total share samples; they are not independent results.

Each table row describes a food/analyte result. Repeated rows do not add independent samples or datasets. No cross-study trend is calculated in this comparison mode.

Reported values, conversion and source locator
Source statisticOriginal resultDisplayed unit conversion
ranget-As determined in analyzed brown rice samples varied between 172 and 233 ng g−1 (Table 4: 172.2 ± 7.9 to 233.0 ± 6.4)ng/g x 1 (none)

Table 4 (p. 592, Food Anal Methods 2019 12:592-593); Application section.

No moisture, cooking-yield or species conversion is applied to the original finding above. Any basis conversion used for its HMI comparison is stated separately with the numerical target.

Open the primary publication · HMI source record