Rice finding 311

Source evidence and comparison details for the Rice profile.

EFSA 2009

Rice grains (EFSA concise sub-group 'Rice grains'; form not specified) · Total arsenic (tAs) · 1122 analytical results (samples) for rice grains.

Selected finding and reference

360 µg/kg (95th percentile)95th percentile.

1122 analytical results (samples) for rice grains. Basis: as reported by laboratories (whole/fresh mass implied; LODs expressed as fresh mass, Figure 5); not stated per sample.

9.8% of results <LOD/<LOQ. LB sets censored results to 0, UB to the reported LOD/LOQ (EFSA). Not imputed here.

HMI baseline position

Limited data: The source reports a range, percentile or extreme value; only a mean, median or sample result can be positioned against a reference. Missing evidence never means low contamination.

The source reports a range, percentile or extreme value; only a mean, median or sample result can be positioned against a reference.

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

No admitted reference

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

Collection period

2003–2008

No year-by-year sample register is reconstructed from this summary.

Geographic scope

Rice grains

All samples in the study.

Sampling, analysis and reporting limits

Total arsenic; methods across the whole data set HG-AAS 39%, ET-AAS 12%, ICP-MS 10%, unspecified 39%; not cross-tabulated by matrix.

9.8% of results <LOD/<LOQ. LB sets censored results to 0, UB to the reported LOD/LOQ (EFSA). Not imputed here.

Shared samples and study overlap

Subgroup rows, statistics of the same subgroup and the study total share samples; they are not independent results.

Each table row describes a food/analyte result. Repeated rows do not add independent samples or datasets. No cross-study trend is calculated in this comparison mode.

Reported values, conversion and source locator
Source statisticOriginal resultDisplayed unit conversion
95th percentileRice grains 1122 9.8% LB 0.0000 0.1100 0.1362 0.3600 1.1800 4.5% / UB 0.0240 0.1100 0.1424 0.3600 1.1800mg/kg x 1000

Table 6 (EFSA Journal 2009;7(10):1351 p.41-42).

No moisture, cooking-yield or species conversion is applied to the original finding above. Any basis conversion used for its HMI comparison is stated separately with the numerical target.

Open the primary publication · HMI source record