Rice finding 2679

Source evidence and comparison details for the Rice profile.

Brombach et al. 2016

Rice grain and rice products (mixed, excluding the 9 baby rice products): 75 rice-grain samples (incl. 3 wild rice) plus 2 rice noodles and 1 rice flour · Methylmercury (MeHg) · 78 retail rice products (packs homogenised, ~100 g milled subsample).

Selected finding and reference

1.98 µg/kg (mean ± 1.1 SD)Mean.

78 retail rice products (packs homogenised, ~100 g milled subsample). Basis: unspecified (milled as-sold product; no moisture correction stated).

No non-detects reported; all values above LOD (tHg LOD 0.02, MeHg LOD 0.12 µg/kg)

HMI baseline position

Limited data: No compatible reference units exist for this analyte, material and basis after the complete rice ledger. Missing evidence never means low contamination.

No compatible reference units exist for this analyte, material and basis after the complete rice ledger.

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

No admitted reference

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

Collection period

Collection date unreported

No year-by-year sample register is reconstructed from this summary.

Geographic scope

other rice products

All samples in the study.

Sampling, analysis and reporting limits

Total Hg: HNO3 hot-block digestion + BrCl, CV-AFS; MeHg: TMAH microwave extraction, thiol/thiourea SPE preconcentration, HPLC-CV-AFS; 19-sample subset also by SS-ID-GC-ICPMS.

No non-detects reported; all values above LOD (tHg LOD 0.02, MeHg LOD 0.12 µg/kg)

Shared samples and study overlap

Subgroup rows, statistics of the same subgroup and the study total share samples; they are not independent results.

Each table row describes a food/analyte result. Repeated rows do not add independent samples or datasets. No cross-study trend is calculated in this comparison mode.

Reported values, conversion and source locator
Source statisticOriginal resultDisplayed unit conversion
meanall other rice products tested in this study (1.98 ± 1.10 µg kg-1, p=0.29)none (µg/kg)

Original SD: 1.1 µg/kg.

Results and discussion, p. 9.

No moisture, cooking-yield or species conversion is applied to the original finding above. Any basis conversion used for its HMI comparison is stated separately with the numerical target.

Open the primary publication · HMI source record